Kayon Scientific, Whitley Bay, England.
Antibody Analytics, Chapelhall, Motherwell, Scotland.
SLAS Discov. 2020 Oct;25(9):977-984. doi: 10.1177/2472555220934814. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
Funding pressure on the pharmaceutical industry to deliver new medicines to the market under aggressive timelines has led to a demand for analytical tools with higher detection sensitivity, increased throughput, and automation to speed up research and discovery efforts and converge upon clinically fit leads faster. In the quest for therapeutic antibodies, the early adoption of interaction analysis platforms utilizing surface plasmon resonance (SPR) detection provides insightful molecular-level information about the binding properties of antibody libraries that are key to understanding an antibody's mechanism of action and can guide the library-to-leads triage. Here, we sought to compare the binding kinetics obtained on two state-of-the-art high-throughput SPR platforms in an independent study conducted by unrelated groups located on different continents. We show that when experiments were performed by skilled users adhering to SPR best practices and allowed freedom in their assay design, the two platforms yielded near-identical results, establishing them both as reliable tools in accelerating the characterization of antibody libraries in providing critical information needed to advance leads to the clinic.
制药行业在紧张的时间内推出新药的资金压力,导致对具有更高检测灵敏度、更高通量和自动化的分析工具的需求,以加速研究和发现工作,并更快地获得临床适合的先导化合物。在寻找治疗性抗体的过程中,早期采用利用表面等离子体共振(SPR)检测的相互作用分析平台,可以提供有关抗体文库结合特性的有见地的分子水平信息,这是理解抗体作用机制的关键,并且可以指导文库到先导化合物的分类。在这里,我们试图在两个独立的、位于不同大陆的、不相关的小组进行的研究中,比较两种最先进的高通量 SPR 平台上获得的结合动力学数据。我们表明,当经验丰富的用户遵循 SPR 最佳实践进行实验,并允许在其测定设计中自由发挥时,这两个平台产生了几乎相同的结果,这两个平台都可作为可靠的工具,加速抗体文库的表征,提供推进先导化合物进入临床所需的关键信息。