• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多组分姑息治疗方案对养老院居民生命最后一个月住院使用及死亡地点的影响:一项多国群组随机对照试验的二次分析。

Lack of Effect of a Multicomponent Palliative Care Program for Nursing Home Residents on Hospital Use in the Last Month of Life and on Place of Death: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicountry Cluster Randomized Control Trial.

机构信息

End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.

End-of-Life Care Research Group, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1973-1978.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.003
PMID:32646823
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

PACE Steps to Success is a 1-year train-the-trainer program aiming to integrate nonspecialist palliative care into nursing homes via staff education and organizational support. In this study, we aimed to explore whether this program resulted in changes in residents' hospital use and place of death.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the PACE cluster randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN14741671). Data were collected on deaths over the previous 4 months via questionnaires at baseline and postintervention.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Questionnaires were completed by the nurse/care-assistant most involved from 78 nursing homes in 7 European Union countries.

MEASURES

We measured number of emergency department visits, hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, and place of death. Baseline and postintervention scores between intervention and control groups were compared, and we conducted exploratory mixed-model analyses. We collected 551 out of 610 questionnaires at baseline and 984 out of 1178 at postintervention in 37 intervention and 36 control homes.

RESULTS

We found no statistical significant effects of the program on emergency department visits [odds ratio (OR) = 1.38, P = .32], hospital admissions (OR = 0.98, P = .93), length of hospital stay (geometric mean difference = 0.85, P = .44), or place of death (OR = 1.08, P = .80).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

We found no effect of the PACE program on either hospital use in the last month of life or place of death. Although this may be related to implementation problems in some homes, the program might also require a more specific focus on managing acute end-of-life situations and a closer involvement of general practitioners or specialist palliative care services to influence hospital use or place of death.

摘要

目的

PACE 成功步骤是一项为期 1 年的培训师培训计划,旨在通过员工教育和组织支持将非专业姑息治疗融入养老院。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨该计划是否会导致居民住院使用和死亡地点的变化。

设计

PACE 集群随机对照试验(ISRCTN67753341)的二次分析。通过基线和干预后的问卷收集过去 4 个月内的死亡数据。

地点和参与者

来自 7 个欧盟国家的 78 家养老院的护士/护理助理最了解情况的人填写了问卷。

措施

我们测量了急诊就诊次数、住院入院次数、住院时间和死亡地点。比较了干预组和对照组的基线和干预后得分,并进行了探索性混合模型分析。我们在 37 个干预组和 36 个对照组中收集了基线时的 551 份问卷和干预后 984 份问卷。

结果

我们没有发现该计划对急诊就诊(优势比 [OR] = 1.38,P =.32)、住院入院(OR = 0.98,P =.93)、住院时间(几何均数差异 = 0.85,P =.44)或死亡地点(OR = 1.08,P =.80)有统计学显著影响。

结论和意义

我们没有发现 PACE 计划对生命最后一个月的住院使用或死亡地点有任何影响。尽管这可能与一些家庭的实施问题有关,但该计划可能还需要更具体地关注管理急性临终情况,并更密切地参与全科医生或专科姑息治疗服务,以影响住院使用或死亡地点。

相似文献

1
Lack of Effect of a Multicomponent Palliative Care Program for Nursing Home Residents on Hospital Use in the Last Month of Life and on Place of Death: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicountry Cluster Randomized Control Trial.多组分姑息治疗方案对养老院居民生命最后一个月住院使用及死亡地点的影响:一项多国群组随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1973-1978.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Evaluation of a Palliative Care Program for Nursing Homes in 7 Countries: The PACE Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.评估 7 个国家养老院姑息治疗项目:PACE 集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):233-242. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5349.
3
No difference in effects of 'PACE steps to success' palliative care program for nursing home residents with and without dementia: a pre-planned subgroup analysis of the seven-country PACE trial.疗养院有无痴呆症居民的“PACE 迈向成功步骤”姑息治疗计划效果无差异:七国 PACE 试验的预先计划亚组分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 7;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00734-1.
4
Integrating palliative care in long-term care facilities across Europe (PACE): protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial of the 'PACE Steps to Success' intervention in seven countries.将姑息治疗融入欧洲长期护理机构(PACE):在七个国家开展“PACE 迈向成功”干预措施的群组随机对照试验方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 12;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0297-1.
5
Improving end-of-life outcomes in nursing homes by targeting residents at high-risk of mortality for palliative care: program description and evaluation.通过针对高死亡风险居民进行姑息治疗来改善养老院的临终结局:项目描述与评估
J Palliat Med. 2008 Mar;11(2):217-25. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0147.
6
Improved Quality of Death and Dying in Care Homes: A Palliative Care Stepped Wedge Randomized Control Trial in Australia.改善养老院临终关怀质量:澳大利亚缓和医疗递进式楔形随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):305-312. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16192. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
7
Reducing time in acute hospitals: A stepped-wedge randomised control trial of a specialist palliative care intervention in residential care homes.减少急性医院住院时间:在养老院中实施专科姑息治疗干预的渐进式随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2020 May;34(5):571-579. doi: 10.1177/0269216319891077. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
8
Effects of strategies to improve general practitioner-nurse collaboration and communication in regard to hospital admissions of nursing home residents (interprof ACT): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.改善全科医生-护士合作及有关养老院居民住院事宜沟通的策略对(多专业合作行动)的影响:一项针对群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Nov 5;21(1):913. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04736-x.
9
Aged care clinical mentoring model of change in nursing homes in China: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.中国养老院老年护理临床指导变革模式:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3596-6.
10
Improving palliative care through teamwork (IMPACTT) in nursing homes: Study design and baseline findings.养老院中通过团队合作改善姑息治疗(IMPACTT):研究设计与基线结果
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 May;56:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Models for delivery and co-ordination of primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living in aged care facilities.为居住在老年护理机构中的老年人提供初级或二级医疗保健(或两者兼顾)的交付和协调模型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 1;3(3):CD013880. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013880.pub2.
2
Which interventions are effective at decreasing or increasing emergency department attendances or hospital admissions from long-term care facilities? A systematic review.哪些干预措施可有效减少或增加长期护理机构的急诊就诊或住院人数?系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 2;13(2):e064914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064914.
3
Nursing Home Palliative Care During the Pandemic: Directions for the Future.
疫情期间的养老院姑息治疗:未来方向
Innov Aging. 2022 May 9;6(4):igac030. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac030. eCollection 2022.
4
Use of Theoretical Frameworks in the Development and Testing of Palliative Care Interventions.理论框架在姑息治疗干预措施的制定和测试中的应用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Mar;63(3):e271-e280. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Oct 29.