• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何公平地激励数字接触者追踪。

How to fairly incentivise digital contact tracing.

作者信息

Loi Michele

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Ethics and the History of Medicine and Digital Society Initiative, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106388.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2020-106388
PMID:32647047
Abstract

Digital apps using Bluetooth to log proximity events (henceforth, digital contact tracing) are increasingly supported by technologists and governments. By and large, the public debate on this matter focuses on privacy, with experts from both law and technology offering very concrete proposals and participating to a lively debate. Far less attention is paid to effective incentives and their fairness. This paper aims to fill this gap by offering a practical, workable solution for a promising incentive, justified by the ethical principles of non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy and justice. This incentive is a free phone optimised for running such app.

摘要

使用蓝牙记录近距离接触事件的数字应用程序(以下简称数字接触追踪)越来越受到技术专家和政府的支持。总体而言,公众对此事的辩论主要集中在隐私方面,法律和技术领域的专家都提出了非常具体的建议,并参与了热烈的讨论。而对有效激励措施及其公平性的关注则少得多。本文旨在填补这一空白,通过为一种有前景的激励措施提供切实可行的解决方案,该方案以不伤害、行善、自主和正义的伦理原则为依据。这种激励措施是一款为运行此类应用程序而优化的免费手机。

相似文献

1
How to fairly incentivise digital contact tracing.如何公平地激励数字接触者追踪。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106388.
2
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.
3
Ethics of digital contact tracing wearables.数字接触追踪可穿戴设备的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Sep;48(9):611-615. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106958. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
5
Digital Contact Tracing Against COVID-19 in Europe: Current Features and Ongoing Developments.欧洲针对新冠疫情的数字接触者追踪:当前特点与持续发展
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 17;3:660823. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.660823. eCollection 2021.
6
Views and Needs of Students, Parents, and Teachers on Closed-Circuit Television, Proximity Trackers, and Access Cards to Facilitate COVID-19 Contact Tracing in Schools: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups and Interviews.学生、家长和教师对闭路电视、近距离追踪器及门禁卡以助力学校新冠病毒接触者追踪的看法与需求:焦点小组和访谈的主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 22;7:e44592. doi: 10.2196/44592.
7
Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech's newfound role as global health policy makers.被隐私问题打个措手不及?数字接触者追踪、苹果/谷歌应用程序编程接口以及科技巨头作为全球卫生政策制定者的新角色。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):45-57. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
8
Framing ethical issues associated with the UK COVID-19 contact tracing app: exceptionalising and narrowing the public ethics debate.构建与英国新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序相关的伦理问题:使公共伦理辩论特殊化并使其范围变窄
Ethics Inf Technol. 2022;24(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10676-022-09628-z. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
9
Impact of Privacy Messaging on COVID-19 Exposure Notification App Downloads: Evidence From a Randomized Experiment.隐私信息对新冠病毒暴露通知应用程序下载量的影响:来自一项随机试验的证据。
AJPM Focus. 2023 Mar;2(1):100059. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100059. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
10
Pilot Evaluations of Two Bluetooth Contact Tracing Approaches on a University Campus: Mixed Methods Study.大学校园两种蓝牙接触者追踪方法的试点评估:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 28;5(10):e31086. doi: 10.2196/31086.

引用本文的文献

1
Privacy and security concerns with passively collected location data for digital contact tracing among U.S. college students.美国大学生使用被动收集的位置数据进行数字接触者追踪时的隐私和安全问题。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0294419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294419. eCollection 2023.
2
["Sending a signal of solidarity via bluetooth?"-A medical ethical analysis of the public debate on the Corona-Warn-App].["通过蓝牙发送团结信号?——关于新冠预警应用公众辩论的医学伦理分析"]
Ethik Med. 2023;35(2):265-283. doi: 10.1007/s00481-023-00751-z. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
3
Lessons Learned in Piloting a Digital Personalized COVID-19 "Radar" on a University Campus.
在大学校园试点数字化个性化 COVID-19“雷达”的经验教训。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(2_suppl):76S-82S. doi: 10.1177/00333549221112532. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
The value of social interactions and incentives on the use of a digital contact tracing tool post COVID-19 lockdown in Singapore.新冠疫情封锁后新加坡使用数字接触者追踪工具中社会互动和激励措施的价值。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16820-0.
5
Determinants of the acceptance and adoption of a digital contact tracing tool during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.新加坡在 COVID-19 大流行期间接受和采用数字接触者追踪工具的决定因素。
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Mar 2;150:e54. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822000401.
6
Contact Tracing Apps: Lessons Learned on Privacy, Autonomy, and the Need for Detailed and Thoughtful Implementation.接触者追踪应用程序:关于隐私、自主权以及详细且周到实施必要性的经验教训
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jul 19;9(7):e27449. doi: 10.2196/27449.
7
Considerations for the Design and Implementation of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Scoping Review.考虑设计和实施 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的因素:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 9;9(6):e27102. doi: 10.2196/27102.
8
[On the ethics of corona apps].[论新冠应用程序的伦理问题]
Ethik Med. 2021;33(3):387-400. doi: 10.1007/s00481-021-00629-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
Privacy versus Public Health? A Reassessment of Centralised and Decentralised Digital Contact Tracing.隐私与公共卫生?对集中式和分布式数字接触者追踪的重新评估。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Mar 29;27(2):23. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00301-0.
10
Ethics in the COVID-19 pandemic: myths, false dilemmas, and moral overload.新冠疫情中的伦理:神话、虚假困境与道德负担
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):19-34. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09568-6. Epub 2021 Mar 12.