文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。

Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Lero, Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.


DOI:10.2196/27753
PMID:34003764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8189288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital contact tracing apps have the potential to augment contact tracing systems and disrupt COVID-19 transmission by rapidly identifying secondary cases prior to the onset of infectiousness and linking them into a system of quarantine, testing, and health care worker case management. The international experience of digital contact tracing apps during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates how challenging their design and deployment are. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to derive and summarize best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app. METHODS: A collaborative cross-disciplinary approach was used to derive best practice guidance for designing the ideal digital contact tracing app. A search of the indexed and gray literature was conducted to identify articles describing or evaluating digital contact tracing apps. MEDLINE was searched using a combination of free-text terms and Medical Subject Headings search terms. Gray literature sources searched were the World Health Organization Institutional Repository for Information Sharing, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control publications library, and Google, including the websites of many health protection authorities. Articles that were acceptable for inclusion in this evidence synthesis were peer-reviewed publications, cohort studies, randomized trials, modeling studies, technical reports, white papers, and media reports related to digital contact tracing. RESULTS: Ethical, user experience, privacy and data protection, technical, clinical and societal, and evaluation considerations were identified from the literature. The ideal digital contact tracing app should be voluntary and should be equitably available and accessible. User engagement could be enhanced by small financial incentives, enabling users to tailor aspects of the app to their particular needs and integrating digital contact tracing apps into the wider public health information campaign. Adherence to the principles of good data protection and privacy by design is important to convince target populations to download and use digital contact tracing apps. Bluetooth Low Energy is recommended for a digital contact tracing app's contact event detection, but combining it with ultrasound technology may improve a digital contact tracing app's accuracy. A decentralized privacy-preserving protocol should be followed to enable digital contact tracing app users to exchange and record temporary contact numbers during contact events. The ideal digital contact tracing app should define and risk-stratify contact events according to proximity, duration of contact, and the infectiousness of the case at the time of contact. Evaluating digital contact tracing apps requires data to quantify app downloads, use among COVID-19 cases, successful contact alert generation, contact alert receivers, contact alert receivers that adhere to quarantine and testing recommendations, and the number of contact alert receivers who subsequently are tested positive for COVID-19. The outcomes of digital contact tracing apps' evaluations should be openly reported to allow for the wider public to review the evaluation of the app. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, key considerations and best practice guidance for the design of the ideal digital contact tracing app were derived from the literature.

摘要

背景:数字接触追踪应用程序有可能通过在传染性出现之前迅速识别次要病例,并将其与隔离、检测和医护人员病例管理系统联系起来,从而增强接触追踪系统并阻断 COVID-19 的传播。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,国际上数字接触追踪应用程序的经验表明,其设计和部署具有挑战性。

目的:本研究旨在为设计理想的数字接触追踪应用程序制定最佳实践指南。

方法:采用跨学科协作方法,制定设计理想数字接触追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南。对描述或评估数字接触追踪应用程序的索引文献和灰色文献进行了检索。使用自由文本词和医学主题词搜索词的组合对 MEDLINE 进行了检索。搜索的灰色文献来源包括世界卫生组织信息共享机构知识库、欧洲疾病预防控制中心出版物库以及谷歌,包括许多卫生保护机构的网站。可纳入本证据综合分析的文章为同行评议出版物、队列研究、随机试验、建模研究、技术报告、白皮书和与数字接触追踪相关的媒体报道。

结果:从文献中确定了伦理、用户体验、隐私和数据保护、技术、临床和社会以及评估方面的考虑因素。理想的数字接触追踪应用程序应该是自愿的,并且应该公平地提供和获得。通过小额经济奖励可以提高用户参与度,使用户能够根据自己的特定需求定制应用程序的各个方面,并将数字接触追踪应用程序整合到更广泛的公共卫生信息宣传活动中。坚持良好的数据保护和隐私设计原则对于说服目标人群下载和使用数字接触追踪应用程序非常重要。建议数字接触追踪应用程序的接触事件检测使用蓝牙低能技术,但结合超声技术可能会提高数字接触追踪应用程序的准确性。应遵循分散式隐私保护协议,使数字接触追踪应用程序用户能够在接触事件中交换和记录临时接触号码。理想的数字接触追踪应用程序应根据接近度、接触持续时间和接触时病例的传染性来定义和风险分层接触事件。评估数字接触追踪应用程序需要量化应用程序下载量、COVID-19 病例中的使用情况、成功生成接触警报、接触警报接收者、遵守隔离和检测建议的接触警报接收者以及随后 COVID-19 检测呈阳性的接触警报接收者数量的数据。数字接触追踪应用程序评估的结果应公开报告,以便更广泛的公众可以审查应用程序的评估。

结论:总之,从文献中得出了设计理想的数字接触追踪应用程序的关键考虑因素和最佳实践指南。

相似文献

[1]
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-6-7

[2]
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-6-10

[3]
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-6-2

[4]
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-2-9

[5]
Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-11-10

[6]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[7]
Performance of the Swiss Digital Contact-Tracing App Over Various SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Waves: Repeated Cross-sectional Analyses.

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022-11-11

[8]
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-8-18

[9]
Using Venn Diagrams to Evaluate Digital Contact Tracing: Panel Survey Analysis.

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021-12-6

[10]
Considerations for the Design and Implementation of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Scoping Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-6-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Digital Healthcare Innovative Services in Times of Crisis: A Literature Review.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-4-12

[2]
Predictors of the continuous use of an infectious disease self-management app for epidemiological investigations: a survey of young and middle-aged adults in South Korean citizens.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-11-16

[3]
Epidemic exposure risk assessment in digital contact tracing: A fuzzy logic approach.

Digit Health. 2024-7-21

[4]
The Use of Contact Tracing Technologies for Infection Prevention and Control Purposes in Nosocomial Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.

Infect Dis Rep. 2024-6-7

[5]
Effects of User Experience in Automated Information Processing on Perceived Usefulness of Digital Contact-Tracing Apps: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2024-6-25

[6]
Application of the participatory design in the testing of a baropodometric insole prototype for weight-bearing asymmetry after a stroke: A qualitative study.

Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2024-3-25

[7]
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-10-9

[8]
Implementing and Maintaining a SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Notification Application for Mobile Phones: The Finnish Experience.

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023-7-13

[9]
Implementation of a Hardware-Assisted Bluetooth-Based COVID-19 Tracking Device in a High School: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2023-4-7

[10]
Contact Tracing Research: A Literature Review Based on Scientific Collaboration Network.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-7-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app.

Nature. 2021-6

[2]
An Agent-Based Modeling of COVID-19: Validation, Analysis, and Recommendations.

Cognit Comput. 2021-2-19

[3]
Profiling adopters (and non-adopters) of a contact tracing mobile application: Insights from Australia.

Int J Med Inform. 2021-5

[4]
App Use and Usability of a Barcode-Based Digital Platform to Augment COVID-19 Contact Tracing: Postpilot Survey and Paradata Analysis.

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021-3-26

[5]
Contact-tracing apps help reduce COVID infections, data suggest.

Nature. 2021-3

[6]
Challenges for Nontechnical Implementation of Digital Proximity Tracing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Media Analysis of the SwissCovid App.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-2-26

[7]
Sentiment analysis of user feedback on the HSE's Covid-19 contact tracing app.

Ir J Med Sci. 2022-2

[8]
The Smartphone Pandemic: How Big Tech and public health authorities partner in the digital response to Covid-19.

Glob Public Health. 2021

[9]
Time to evaluate COVID-19 contact-tracing apps.

Nat Med. 2021-3

[10]
Young Adults View Smartphone Tracking Technologies for COVID-19 as Acceptable: The Case of Taiwan.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-2-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索