PROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity" Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
EFFECTS-262 Research Group, Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68197-7.
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a valid and non-invasive indicator of cardiac autonomic nervous system functioning. Short-term HRV recordings (e.g., 10 min long) produce data that usually is manually processed. Researcher subjective decision-making on data processing could produce inter- or intra-researcher differences whose magnitude has not been previously quantified in three independent human cohorts. This study examines the inter- and intra-researcher reproducibility of HRV parameters (i.e., the influence of R-R interval selection by different researchers and by the same researcher in different moments on the quantification of HRV parameters, respectively) derived from short-term recordings in a cohort of children with overweight/obesity, young adults and middle-age adults. Participants were recruited from 3 different studies: 107 children (10.03 ± 1.13 years, 58% male), 132 young adults (22.22 ± 2.20 years, 33% males) and 73 middle-aged adults (53.62 ± 5.18 years, 48% males). HRV was measured using a Polar RS800CX heart rate monitor. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.703 to 0.989 and from 0.950 to 0.998 for inter-and intra-researcher reproducibility, respectively. Limits of agreement for HRV parameters were higher for the inter-researcher processing compared with the intra-researcher processing. On average, the intra-researcher differences were 31%, 62%, and 80% smaller than the inter-researchers differences based on Coefficient of Variation in children, young and middle-aged adults, respectively. Our study provides the quantification of the inter-researcher and intra-researcher differences in three independent human cohorts, which could elicit some clinical relevant differences for HRV parameters. Based on our findings, we recommend the HRV data signal processing to be performed always by the same trained researcher and we postulate a development of algorithms for an automatic ECG selection.
心率变异性(HRV)是心脏自主神经系统功能的有效且非侵入性指标。短期 HRV 记录(例如,持续 10 分钟)产生的数据通常需要手动处理。研究人员在数据处理方面的主观决策可能会产生研究内或研究间的差异,而这些差异的大小在三个独立的人类队列中以前没有被量化过。本研究检查了超重/肥胖儿童、年轻成年人和中年成年人队列中短期记录的 HRV 参数的研究内和研究间可重复性(即不同研究人员和同一研究人员在不同时间对 RR 间隔选择对 HRV 参数定量的影响)。参与者来自三个不同的研究:107 名儿童(10.03±1.13 岁,58%为男性)、132 名年轻成年人(22.22±2.20 岁,33%为男性)和 73 名中年成年人(53.62±5.18 岁,48%为男性)。使用 Polar RS800CX 心率监测仪测量 HRV。组内相关系数(ICC)在研究内和研究间可重复性方面分别为 0.703 至 0.989 和 0.950 至 0.998。与研究内处理相比,HRV 参数的组间处理的一致性界限更高。平均而言,基于变异性,研究内差异分别比研究间差异小 31%、62%和 80%,在儿童、年轻和中年成年人中分别为 31%、62%和 80%。我们的研究提供了三个独立人类队列中研究内和研究间差异的量化,这可能会对 HRV 参数产生一些临床相关的差异。基于我们的发现,我们建议由同一位经过培训的研究人员始终执行 HRV 数据信号处理,并假设开发用于自动 ECG 选择的算法。