Sasso John P, Coates Kyla, Stewart Liam, Gelinas Jinelle, Wright Stephen P, Seiler Stephen, Shave Robert, Eves Neil D
School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Mar;125(3):869-883. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05641-w. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Exercise training requires the careful application of training dose to maximize adaptation while minimizing the risk of illness and injury. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a potent method for improving health and fitness but generates substantial autonomic imbalance. Assuming a supine posture between intervals is a novel strategy that could enhance physiological readiness and training adaptations. This study aimed to establish the safety and feasibility of supine recovery within a HIIT session and explore its acute effects.
Fifteen healthy, active males (18-34 years) underwent assessment of cardiopulmonary fitness. Participants completed two identical HIIT treadmill sessions (4 x [3 min at 95% VO, 3 min recovery]) employing passive recovery in standing (STANDard) or supine (SUPER) posture between intervals. Heart rate variability (HRV), HRV recovery (HRVrec; lnRMSSD) and heart rate recovery at 1 min (HRrec) were assessed using submaximal constant speed running tests (CST) completed prior to, immediately after and 24 h following HIIT.
No severe adverse events occurred with SUPER, and compliance was similar between conditions (100 ± 0%). The change in HRVrec from the CST pre-to-post-HIIT was not different between conditions (p = 0.38); however, HRrec was faster following SUPER (39 ± 7 bpm) vs. STANDard (36 ± 5 bpm). HRV 24 h post-SUPER was also greater (3.56 ± 0.57 ms) compared to STANDard (3.37 ± 0.42 ms). Despite no differences in perceived exertion (p = 0.23) and blood lactate levels (p = 0.35) between SUPER and STANDard, average running HRs were lower (p = 0.04) with SUPER (174 ± 7 bpm) vs. STANDard (176 ± 7 bpm).
Supine recovery within HIIT attenuates acute cardioautonomic perturbation and accelerates post-exercise vagal reactivation. SUPER enhances recovery of vagal modulation, potentially improving physiological preparedness 24 h post-HIIT. Further research exploring the chronic effects of SUPER are now warranted.
运动训练需要谨慎应用训练剂量,以在将疾病和受伤风险降至最低的同时,使适应性最大化。高强度间歇训练(HIIT)是改善健康和体能的有效方法,但会产生显著的自主神经失衡。在间歇期间采用仰卧姿势是一种新策略,可能会增强生理准备状态和训练适应性。本研究旨在确定HIIT训练期间仰卧恢复的安全性和可行性,并探讨其急性效应。
15名健康、活跃的男性(18 - 34岁)接受了心肺适能评估。参与者完成了两次相同的HIIT跑步机训练(4×[95%最大摄氧量下跑3分钟,恢复3分钟]),在间歇期间分别采用站立(标准)或仰卧(超级)姿势进行被动恢复。在HIIT之前、之后立即以及24小时后,通过次最大恒定速度跑步测试(CST)评估心率变异性(HRV)、HRV恢复(HRVrec;自然对数化的连续RR间期标准差)和1分钟时的心率恢复(HRrec)。
超级组未发生严重不良事件,两种条件下的依从性相似(100±0%)。HIIT前后CST中HRVrec的变化在两种条件下无差异(p = 0.38);然而,超级组后的HRrec(39±7次/分钟)比标准组(36±5次/分钟)更快。超级组后24小时的HRV也高于标准组(3.56±0.57毫秒)(3.37±0.42毫秒)。尽管超级组和标准组之间在自觉用力程度(p = 0.23)和血乳酸水平(p = 0.35)上没有差异,但超级组的平均跑步心率较低(p = 0.04)(174±7次/分钟),而标准组为(176±7次/分钟)。
HIIT期间的仰卧恢复可减轻急性心脏自主神经扰动,并加速运动后迷走神经再激活。超级组可增强迷走神经调节的恢复,可能改善HIIT后24小时的生理准备状态。现在有必要进一步研究探索超级组的长期影响。