Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Rheumatology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialities "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11407. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68215-8.
The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of subclinical vascular damage in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). We enrolled PMR patients having major cardiovascular risk factors (MCVRF) and, as controls, patients with MCVRF. All underwent: color Doppler ultrasound to evaluate the common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), the anterior-posterior abdominal aortic diameter (APAD), and the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis; the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) to measure arterial stiffness together with the ankle-brachial index (ABI) to investigate the presence of lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease. Finally, we measured the serum levels of adipocytokines implicated in vascular dysfunction. As a result, 48 PMR and 56 MCVRF patients were included. An increase of IMT (1.07/0.8-1.2 vs 0.8/0.8-1.05; p = 0.0001), CAVI (8.7/7.8-9.3 vs 7.6/6.9-7.8; p < 0.0001) and APAD values (21.15/18.1-25.6 vs 18/16-22; p = 0.0013) was found in PMR patients with respect to controls. No differences were reported in the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis or ABI values between the two groups. A significant correlation between IMT and CAVI in PMR and MCVRF subjects (r = 0.845 and r = 0.556, respectively; p < 0.01) was found. Leptin levels (pg/mL; median/25th-75th percentile) were higher in PMR than in MCVRF subjects (145.1/67-398.6 vs 59.5/39.3-194.3; p = 0.04). Serum levels of adiponectin (ng/mL) were higher in PMR patients (15.9/10.65-24.1 vs 6.1/2.8-22.7; p = 0.01), while no difference in serum levels of resistin (ng/mL) was found between PMR and MCVRF subjects (0.37/0.16-0.66 vs 0.26/0.14-1.24). Our study shows an increased subclinical vascular damage in PMR patients compared to those with MCVRF, paving the way for further studies aimed at planning primary cardiovascular prevention in this population.
本研究旨在探讨巨细胞动脉炎(PMR)患者是否存在亚临床血管损伤。我们纳入了患有主要心血管危险因素(MCVRF)的 PMR 患者,并将其作为对照纳入了患有 MCVRF 的患者。所有患者均接受了以下检查:彩色多普勒超声评估颈总动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)、腹主动脉前后径(APAD)和颈动脉狭窄的发生率;心血管踝血管指数(CAVI)测量动脉僵硬度,同时测量踝臂指数(ABI)以调查下肢外周动脉疾病的发生情况。最后,我们测量了与血管功能障碍相关的血清脂肪细胞因子水平。结果共纳入 48 例 PMR 和 56 例 MCVRF 患者。与对照组相比,PMR 患者的 IMT(1.07/0.8-1.2 比 0.8/0.8-1.05;p=0.0001)、CAVI(8.7/7.8-9.3 比 7.6/6.9-7.8;p<0.0001)和 APAD 值(21.15/18.1-25.6 比 18/16-22;p=0.0013)均升高。两组间颈动脉狭窄发生率或 ABI 值无差异。PMR 和 MCVRF 患者的 IMT 和 CAVI 之间存在显著相关性(r=0.845 和 r=0.556,p<0.01)。PMR 患者的瘦素水平(pg/mL;中位数/25-75 分位数)高于 MCVRF 患者(145.1/67-398.6 比 59.5/39.3-194.3;p=0.04)。PMR 患者的血清脂联素水平(ng/mL)较高(15.9/10.65-24.1 比 6.1/2.8-22.7;p=0.01),而 PMR 和 MCVRF 患者的血清抵抗素水平无差异(0.37/0.16-0.66 比 0.26/0.14-1.24)。本研究表明,与患有 MCVRF 的患者相比,PMR 患者存在亚临床血管损伤增加,为计划该人群的一级心血管预防提供了依据。