Suppr超能文献

探讨性横断面研究巨细胞动脉炎患者亚临床血管损伤。

An exploratory cross-sectional study of subclinical vascular damage in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Rheumatology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.

Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialities "Paride Stefanini", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 9;10(1):11407. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68215-8.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of subclinical vascular damage in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). We enrolled PMR patients having major cardiovascular risk factors (MCVRF) and, as controls, patients with MCVRF. All underwent: color Doppler ultrasound to evaluate the common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), the anterior-posterior abdominal aortic diameter (APAD), and the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis; the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) to measure arterial stiffness together with the ankle-brachial index (ABI) to investigate the presence of lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease. Finally, we measured the serum levels of adipocytokines implicated in vascular dysfunction. As a result, 48 PMR and 56 MCVRF patients were included. An increase of IMT (1.07/0.8-1.2 vs 0.8/0.8-1.05; p = 0.0001), CAVI (8.7/7.8-9.3 vs 7.6/6.9-7.8; p < 0.0001) and APAD values (21.15/18.1-25.6 vs 18/16-22; p = 0.0013) was found in PMR patients with respect to controls. No differences were reported in the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis or ABI values between the two groups. A significant correlation between IMT and CAVI in PMR and MCVRF subjects (r = 0.845 and r = 0.556, respectively; p < 0.01) was found. Leptin levels (pg/mL; median/25th-75th percentile) were higher in PMR than in MCVRF subjects (145.1/67-398.6 vs 59.5/39.3-194.3; p = 0.04). Serum levels of adiponectin (ng/mL) were higher in PMR patients (15.9/10.65-24.1 vs 6.1/2.8-22.7; p = 0.01), while no difference in serum levels of resistin (ng/mL) was found between PMR and MCVRF subjects (0.37/0.16-0.66 vs 0.26/0.14-1.24). Our study shows an increased subclinical vascular damage in PMR patients compared to those with MCVRF, paving the way for further studies aimed at planning primary cardiovascular prevention in this population.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨巨细胞动脉炎(PMR)患者是否存在亚临床血管损伤。我们纳入了患有主要心血管危险因素(MCVRF)的 PMR 患者,并将其作为对照纳入了患有 MCVRF 的患者。所有患者均接受了以下检查:彩色多普勒超声评估颈总动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)、腹主动脉前后径(APAD)和颈动脉狭窄的发生率;心血管踝血管指数(CAVI)测量动脉僵硬度,同时测量踝臂指数(ABI)以调查下肢外周动脉疾病的发生情况。最后,我们测量了与血管功能障碍相关的血清脂肪细胞因子水平。结果共纳入 48 例 PMR 和 56 例 MCVRF 患者。与对照组相比,PMR 患者的 IMT(1.07/0.8-1.2 比 0.8/0.8-1.05;p=0.0001)、CAVI(8.7/7.8-9.3 比 7.6/6.9-7.8;p<0.0001)和 APAD 值(21.15/18.1-25.6 比 18/16-22;p=0.0013)均升高。两组间颈动脉狭窄发生率或 ABI 值无差异。PMR 和 MCVRF 患者的 IMT 和 CAVI 之间存在显著相关性(r=0.845 和 r=0.556,p<0.01)。PMR 患者的瘦素水平(pg/mL;中位数/25-75 分位数)高于 MCVRF 患者(145.1/67-398.6 比 59.5/39.3-194.3;p=0.04)。PMR 患者的血清脂联素水平(ng/mL)较高(15.9/10.65-24.1 比 6.1/2.8-22.7;p=0.01),而 PMR 和 MCVRF 患者的血清抵抗素水平无差异(0.37/0.16-0.66 比 0.26/0.14-1.24)。本研究表明,与患有 MCVRF 的患者相比,PMR 患者存在亚临床血管损伤增加,为计划该人群的一级心血管预防提供了依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebd3/7347873/e8eaa25a4cff/41598_2020_68215_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验