Huang Daozheng, Ma Huan, Ma Jie, Hong Liyan, Lian Xingji, Wu Yanhua, Wu Yan, Wang Shouhong, Qin Tiehe, Tan Ning
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong Provincial Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):786. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.04.56.
Passive leg raising (PLR) test, known as reversible increasing venous return, could predict hemodynamic intolerance induced by renal replacement therapy (RRT). Oppositely, blood drainage procedure at the start of RRT cuts down intravascular capacity which is likely to have changes in fluid responsiveness has been little studied. Our study aimed to determine whether blood drainage procedure, defined as blood pump-out test, which is essential and inevitable at the beginning of RRT could predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
Critically ill patients underwent RRT with pulse contour analysis were included. During PLR, an increase of cardiac output (CO, derived from pulse contour analysis) ≥10% compared to baseline was considered responders as the gold standard. BPT was performed at a constant speed after the increase of CO induced by PLR returned to baseline and the maximal of CO within 2 minutes was recorded. Then area under ROC curve of CO changes to identify responders from non-responders in BPT was calculated based on the results from PLR test.
Sixty-five patients were enrolled. Thirty-one/sixty-five patients (47.7%) were considered responders during PLR. And after analysis by ROC curve, a decrease in CO greater than 11.0% during BPT predicted fluid responsiveness with 70.9% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity. The highest area under the curve (AUC) was found for an increase in CO (0.74±0.06; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.84).
BPT could be a supplement to PLR, providing a novel maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients underwent RRT. (Trial registration: ChiCTR-DDD-17010534). Registered 30 January 2017 (retrospective registration).
被动抬腿(PLR)试验,即通过可逆性增加静脉回心血量,可预测肾替代治疗(RRT)引起的血流动力学不耐受。相反,RRT开始时的血液引流操作会降低血管内容量,而这种操作对液体反应性变化的影响鲜少被研究。我们的研究旨在确定在RRT开始时必不可少且不可避免的血液引流操作(定义为血泵出试验)是否能够预测危重症患者的液体反应性。
纳入接受脉搏轮廓分析的RRT危重症患者。在PLR期间,与基线相比心输出量(CO,通过脉搏轮廓分析得出)增加≥10%被视为反应者,作为金标准。在PLR诱导的CO增加恢复到基线后,以恒定速度进行血泵出试验(BPT),并记录2分钟内CO的最大值。然后根据PLR试验结果计算BPT中CO变化的ROC曲线下面积,以区分反应者和无反应者。
共纳入65例患者。31/65例患者(47.7%)在PLR期间被视为反应者。通过ROC曲线分析,BPT期间CO下降大于11.0%可预测液体反应性,敏感性为70.9%,特异性为76.5%。发现CO增加时曲线下面积(AUC)最高(0.74±0.06;95%CI:0.62至0.84)。
血泵出试验(BPT)可作为PLR的补充,为预测接受RRT的危重症患者的液体反应性提供一种新方法。(试验注册号:ChiCTR-DDD-17010534)。于2017年1月30日注册(回顾性注册)。