North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):2957-2974. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00252-y. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
The crash of two 737 MAX passenger aircraft in late 2018 and early 2019, and subsequent grounding of the entire fleet of 737 MAX jets, turned a global spotlight on Boeing's practices and culture. Explanations for the crashes include: design flaws within the MAX's new flight control software system designed to prevent stalls; internal pressure to keep pace with Boeing's chief competitor, Airbus; Boeing's lack of transparency about the new software; and the lack of adequate monitoring of Boeing by the FAA, especially during the certification of the MAX and following the first crash. While these and other factors have been the subject of numerous government reports and investigative journalism articles, little to date has been written on the ethical significance of the accidents, in particular the ethical responsibilities of the engineers at Boeing and the FAA involved in designing and certifying the MAX. Lessons learned from this case include the need to strengthen the voice of engineers within large organizations. There is also the need for greater involvement of professional engineering societies in ethics-related activities and for broader focus on moral courage in engineering ethics education.
2018 年末和 2019 年初,两架 737 MAX 客机坠毁,随后该机型的全部客机停飞,这一事件使全球目光聚焦于波音公司的运营方式和企业文化上。对坠机事件的解释包括:MAX 新型飞行控制系统软件设计存在缺陷,旨在防止失速;迫于与波音主要竞争对手空客保持同步的内部压力;波音对新型软件缺乏透明度;以及 FAA 对波音的监督不力,尤其是在 MAX 认证和首起坠机事故之后。虽然这些因素和其他因素已经成为众多政府报告和调查性新闻文章的主题,但迄今为止,关于这些事故的伦理意义,尤其是参与设计和认证 MAX 的波音公司和 FAA 的工程师的伦理责任,几乎没有任何著述。从这一案例中吸取的教训包括:需要在大型组织中加强工程师的话语权。还需要更多地让专业工程师协会参与与伦理相关的活动,并在工程伦理教育中更广泛地关注道德勇气。