Diagnostic & Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Medical-chemical laboratory Dr Mustafa, Dr Richter OG, Salzburg, Austria.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct;26(10):1417.e1-1417.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
New molecular tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are being rapidly launched in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the VIASURE SARS-CoV-2 S gene RT-PCR Kit on the BD Max™ system and to compare results with those obtained with the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 test on the cobas® 6800 system.
For testing the analytical performance, reference material was used. Clinical samples (n = 101) obtained from individuals with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were studied. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected by using either ESwab™ or UTM™ collection systems.
When the analytical performance was evaluated, the sample containing the lowest SARS-CoV-2 concentration tested negative with the VIASURE test whereas results obtained with the cobas® test were found to be concordant with the results expected. Six out of the 101 clinical samples (5.9%) showed an inhibition with the VIASURE test. When analysing the remaining 95 clinical samples, 27 were found to be negative with both assays. Of 68 samples that were positive with the cobas® test, the VIASURE test missed 21 (30.9 %) samples. All of those 21 samples had shown Ct values ≥ 31 with the cobas® 6800 system. None of the samples tested positive with the VIASURE test and negative with the cobas® test.
The VIASURE test was impaired by a lack of sensitivity and a relatively high number of invalid results. When using the VIASURE test for routine testing, a significant number of COVID-19-positive samples would have been missed.
为应对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,新的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)分子检测方法正在迅速推出。本研究旨在评估 BD Max 系统上的 VIASURE SARS-CoV-2 S 基因 RT-PCR 试剂盒的分析性能,并与 cobas® 6800 系统上的 cobas® SARS-CoV-2 检测的结果进行比较。
使用参考材料进行测试分析性能。研究了 101 例来自症状与 COVID-19 相符的个体的临床样本。使用 ESwab™或 UTM™采集系统采集口咽和鼻咽拭子。
在评估分析性能时,含最低 SARS-CoV-2 浓度的样本用 VIASURE 检测呈阴性,而 cobas® 检测的结果与预期结果一致。在 101 例临床样本中,有 6 例(5.9%)VIASURE 检测显示抑制。分析其余 95 例临床样本时,两种检测方法均为阴性的有 27 例。在 68 例 cobas®检测阳性的样本中,VIASURE 检测漏检 21 例(30.9%)。这些样本的 cobas® 6800 系统的 Ct 值均≥31。没有样本用 VIASURE 检测阳性而 cobas® 检测阴性。
VIASURE 检测的灵敏度较差,无效结果相对较多。如果将 VIASURE 检测用于常规检测,将错过大量 COVID-19 阳性样本。