• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剂量输送时间对具有不同生物学参数的质子辐照中生物学效应的影响。

The impact of dose delivery time on biological effectiveness in proton irradiation with various biological parameters.

作者信息

Kasamatsu Koki, Matsuura Taeko, Tanaka Sodai, Takao Seishin, Miyamoto Naoki, Nam Jin-Min, Shirato Hiroki, Shimizu Shinichi, Umegaki Kikuo

机构信息

Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608638, Japan.

Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 0608628, Japan.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):4644-4655. doi: 10.1002/mp.14381. Epub 2020 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1002/mp.14381
PMID:32652574
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sublethal damage (SLD) repair effect in prolonged proton irradiation using the biophysical model with various cell-specific parameters of (α/β) and T (repair half time). At present, most of the model-based studies on protons have focused on acute radiation, neglecting the reduction in biological effectiveness due to SLD repair during the delivery of radiation. Nevertheless, the dose-rate dependency of biological effectiveness may become more important as advanced treatment techniques, such as hypofractionation and respiratory gating, come into clinical practice, as these techniques sometimes require long treatment times. Also, while previous research using the biophysical model revealed a large repair effect with a high physical dose, the dependence of the repair effect on cell-specific parameters has not been evaluated systematically.

METHODS

Biological dose [relative biological effectiveness (RBE) × physical dose] calculation with repair included was carried out using the linear energy transfer (LET)-dependent linear-quadratic (LQ) model combined with the theory of dual radiation action (TDRA). First, we extended the dose protraction factor in the LQ model for the arbitrary number of different LET proton irradiations delivered sequentially with arbitrary time lags, referring to the TDRA. Using the LQ model, the decrease in biological dose due to SLD repair was systematically evaluated for spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) irradiation in a water phantom with the possible ranges of both (α/β) and repair parameters ((α/β)  = 1-15 Gy, T  = 0-90 min). Then, to consider more realistic irradiation conditions, clinical cases of prostate, liver, and lung tumors were examined with the cell-specific parameters for each tumor obtained from the literature. Biological D and biological dose homogeneity coefficient (HC) were calculated for the clinical target volumes (CTVs), assuming dose-rate structures with a total irradiation time of 0-60 min.

RESULTS

The differences in the cell-specific parameters resulted in considerable variation in the repair effect. The biological dose reduction found at the center of the SOBP with 30 min of continuous irradiation varied from 1.13% to 14.4% with a T range of 1-90 min when (α/β) is fixed as 10 Gy. It varied from 2.3% to 6.8% with an (α/β) range of 1-15 Gy for a fixed value of T  = 30 min. The decrease in biological D per 10 min was 2.6, 1.2, and 3.0% for the prostate, liver, and lung tumor cases, respectively. The value of the biological D reduction was neither in the order of (α/β) nor prescribed dose, but both comparably contributed to the repair effect. The variation of HC was within the range of 0.5% for all cases; therefore, the dose distribution was not distorted.

CONCLUSION

The reduction in biological dose caused by the SLD repair largely depends on the cell-specific parameters in addition to the physical dose. The parameters should be considered carefully in the evaluation of the repair effect in prolonged proton irradiation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用生物物理模型,结合不同细胞特异性参数(α/β)和T(修复半衰期),评估质子长时间照射下的亚致死损伤(SLD)修复效果。目前,大多数基于模型的质子研究都集中在急性辐射上,忽略了辐射过程中由于SLD修复导致的生物学效应降低。然而,随着诸如大分割放疗和呼吸门控等先进治疗技术应用于临床实践,生物学效应的剂量率依赖性可能变得更加重要,因为这些技术有时需要较长的治疗时间。此外,虽然先前使用生物物理模型的研究显示在高物理剂量下有较大的修复效果,但修复效果对细胞特异性参数的依赖性尚未得到系统评估。

方法

采用与双辐射作用理论(TDRA)相结合的依赖线性能量传递(LET)的线性二次(LQ)模型,进行包含修复的生物剂量[相对生物效应(RBE)×物理剂量]计算。首先,参考TDRA,我们将LQ模型中的剂量延长因子扩展到任意数量的不同LET质子照射,这些照射以任意时间间隔顺序进行。使用LQ模型,在水模体中针对扩展布拉格峰(SOBP)照射,系统评估了在(α/β)和修复参数(α/β = 1 - 15 Gy,T = 0 - 90分钟)的可能范围内,由于SLD修复导致的生物剂量降低。然后,为考虑更实际的照射条件,利用从文献中获得的每种肿瘤的细胞特异性参数,对前列腺、肝脏和肺部肿瘤的临床病例进行了研究。假设总照射时间为0 - 60分钟的剂量率结构,计算了临床靶区(CTV)的生物D和生物剂量均匀性系数(HC)。

结果

细胞特异性参数的差异导致修复效果有显著变化。当(α/β)固定为10 Gy时,在SOBP中心连续照射30分钟时,生物剂量降低在T范围为1 - 90分钟时从1.13%变化到14.4%。对于固定的T = 30分钟,在α/β范围为1 - 15 Gy时,生物剂量降低从2.3%变化到6.8%。前列腺、肝脏和肺部肿瘤病例每10分钟生物D的降低分别为2.6%、1.2%和3.0%。生物D降低值既不按(α/β)顺序也不按规定剂量排列,但两者对修复效果的贡献相当。所有病例中HC的变化在0.5%范围内;因此,剂量分布未发生畸变。

结论

除物理剂量外,SLD修复导致的生物剂量降低在很大程度上取决于细胞特异性参数。在评估质子长时间照射下的修复效果时,应仔细考虑这些参数。

相似文献

1
The impact of dose delivery time on biological effectiveness in proton irradiation with various biological parameters.剂量输送时间对具有不同生物学参数的质子辐照中生物学效应的影响。
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):4644-4655. doi: 10.1002/mp.14381. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
2
Impact of a spatially dependent dose delivery time structure on the biological effectiveness of scanning proton therapy.扫描质子治疗中剂量传递时间结构的空间依赖性对生物效应的影响。
Med Phys. 2022 Jan;49(1):702-713. doi: 10.1002/mp.15367. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
3
Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.由于生物学效应的变化,质子治疗中的范围不确定性。
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Mar 7;57(5):1159-72. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/5/1159. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
4
Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios.质子治疗中可变的相对生物效应:不同模型预测的比较及其对临床类似场景的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2016 May 17;11:68. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0642-6.
5
Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LET on relative biological effectiveness in scanned proton beams: An in vitro study based on human cell lines.研究α/β和传能线密度对扫描质子束相对生物效应的影响:基于人类细胞系的体外研究。
Med Phys. 2020 Aug;47(8):3691-3702. doi: 10.1002/mp.14212. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
Apparent absence of a proton beam dose rate effect and possible differences in RBE between Bragg peak and plateau.质子束剂量率效应的明显缺失以及 Bragg 峰和平台之间的 RBE 可能存在差异。
Med Phys. 2010 Oct;37(10):5376-81. doi: 10.1118/1.3490086.
7
Investigating the Implications of a Variable RBE on Proton Dose Fractionation Across a Clinical Pencil Beam Scanned Spread-Out Bragg Peak.研究可变相对生物学效应(RBE)对临床笔形束扫描扩展布拉格峰质子剂量分割的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
8
Variation of the relative biological effectiveness with fractionation in proton therapy: Analysis of prostate cancer response.质子治疗中分割对相对生物效应的影响变化:前列腺癌反应分析。
Med Phys. 2023 Nov;50(11):7304-7312. doi: 10.1002/mp.16783. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
9
Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure.混合场照射中高LET 和低 LET 辐射剂量成分的生物学效应的相互作用。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Dec;87(12):1162-72. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2011.624154. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
10
Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.质子束治疗中相对生物学效应(RBE)变化的意义与实施
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Oct;2(5):413-26. doi: 10.1177/153303460300200506.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiobiological evaluation considering the treatment time with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.考虑脑转移瘤立体定向放射外科治疗时间的放射生物学评估。
BJR Open. 2022 Nov 24;4(1):20220013. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20220013. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of FLASH Proton Entrance and the Spread-Out Bragg Peak Dose Regions in the Sparing of Mouse Intestinal Crypts and in a Pancreatic Tumor Model.FLASH质子入射与扩展布拉格峰剂量区域在保护小鼠肠隐窝及胰腺肿瘤模型中的比较
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 23;13(16):4244. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164244.