• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗提醒和追踪手环对巴基斯坦城市常规儿童免疫接种覆盖率和及时性的影响(2017-18 年):一项随机对照试验。

Effect of vaccine reminder and tracker bracelets on routine childhood immunization coverage and timeliness in urban Pakistan (2017-18): a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

IRD Global, 15 Beach Road #02-01, Singapore, 189677, Singapore.

IRD Pakistan, 4th Floor Woodcraft Building, Korangi Creek, Karachi, 75190, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 11;20(1):1086. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09088-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09088-4
PMID:32652969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7353686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inability to track children's vaccination history coupled with parents' lack of awareness of vaccination due dates compounds the problem of low immunization coverage and timeliness in developing countries. We evaluated the impact of two types of silicone immunization reminder bracelets for children in improving immunization coverage and timeliness of Pentavalent-3 and the Measles-1 vaccines.

METHODS

Children < 3 months were enrolled in either of the 2 intervention groups (Alma Sana Bracelet Group and Star Bracelet Group) or the Control group. Children in the intervention groups were provided the two different bracelets at the time of recruitment. Each time the child visited the immunization center, a hole was perforated in the silicone bracelet to denote vaccine administration. Each child was followed up till administration of Measles-1 vaccine or till 12 months of age (if they did not come to the center for vaccination). Data was analyzed using the intention-to-treat population between groups. The unadjusted and adjusted Risk Ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for Pentavalent-3 and Measles-1 coverage at 12 months of age were estimated through bivariate and multivariate analysis. Time-to-Pentavalent-3 and Measles-1 immunization curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 1,445 children were enrolled in the study between July 19, 2017 and October 10, 2017. Baseline characteristics among the three groups were similar. Up-to-date coverage for the Pentavalent-3 /Measles-1 vaccine at 12 months of age was 84.6%/72.0%, 85.4%/70.5% and 83.0%/68.5% in Alma Sana Bracelet group, Star Bracelet group and Control group respectively but the differences were not statistically significant. In the multivariate analysis, neither the Alma Sana bracelet (adjusted RR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.96-1.06), (adjusted RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.97-1.13) nor the Star bracelet (adjusted RR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.96-1.06) (adjusted RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.95-1.11) was significantly associated with Pentavalent-3 vaccination or Measles-1 vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Although we did not observe any significant impact of the bracelets on improved immunization coverage and timeliness, our findings add to the existing literature on innovative, low cost reminders for health and make several suggestions for enhancing practical implementation of these tools.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03310762 . Retrospectively Registered on October 16, 2017.

摘要

背景

发展中国家儿童疫苗接种史难以追踪,加之家长对疫苗接种时间缺乏认识,这使得疫苗接种覆盖率和及时性低的问题更加复杂。我们评估了两种类型的硅胶免疫提醒手镯对儿童接种五联疫苗和麻疹-1 疫苗的影响。

方法

<3 个月大的儿童被纳入 2 个干预组(Alma Sana 手镯组和 Star 手镯组)或对照组。在招募时,干预组的儿童会获得两种不同的手镯。每次孩子去免疫中心时,都会在硅胶手镯上打一个孔,表示疫苗接种。每个孩子都会被随访到接种麻疹-1 疫苗或 12 个月(如果他们不来中心接种疫苗)。使用群组间意向治疗人群进行数据分析。通过双变量和多变量分析,估计了 12 个月时五联疫苗和麻疹-1 疫苗覆盖率的未调整和调整风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算五联疫苗和麻疹-1 疫苗接种时间曲线。

结果

2017 年 7 月 19 日至 2017 年 10 月 10 日期间,共有 1445 名儿童入组研究。三组的基线特征相似。12 个月时,五联疫苗/麻疹-1 疫苗的最新接种率分别为 Alma Sana 手镯组 84.6%/72.0%、Star 手镯组 85.4%/70.5%和对照组 83.0%/68.5%,但差异无统计学意义。在多变量分析中,Alma Sana 手镯(调整 RR=1.01;95%CI:0.96-1.06)和 Star 手镯(调整 RR=1.01;95%CI:0.96-1.06)均与五联疫苗接种或麻疹-1 疫苗接种无显著相关性(调整 RR:1.05;95%CI:0.97-1.13)。

结论

尽管我们没有观察到手镯对提高免疫接种覆盖率和及时性有任何显著影响,但我们的发现增加了关于健康创新、低成本提醒的现有文献,并为增强这些工具的实际实施提出了几点建议。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03310762. 2017 年 10 月 16 日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/6d7dd08c8e8a/12889_2020_9088_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/18bcc975dd54/12889_2020_9088_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/1969c42fbf96/12889_2020_9088_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/b16e6bd2f812/12889_2020_9088_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/cac375160979/12889_2020_9088_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/6d7dd08c8e8a/12889_2020_9088_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/18bcc975dd54/12889_2020_9088_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/1969c42fbf96/12889_2020_9088_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/b16e6bd2f812/12889_2020_9088_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/cac375160979/12889_2020_9088_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4263/7353686/6d7dd08c8e8a/12889_2020_9088_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of vaccine reminder and tracker bracelets on routine childhood immunization coverage and timeliness in urban Pakistan (2017-18): a randomized controlled trial.疫苗提醒和追踪手环对巴基斯坦城市常规儿童免疫接种覆盖率和及时性的影响(2017-18 年):一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 11;20(1):1086. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09088-4.
2
Effect of vaccine reminder and tracker bracelets on routine childhood immunization coverage and timeliness in urban Pakistan: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.疫苗提醒和追踪手环对巴基斯坦城市儿童常规免疫接种覆盖率和及时性的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):1421. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7667-3.
3
Parental awareness and coverage of mass measles vaccination drive 2011: cross-sectional survey in the metropolitan city of Karachi, Pakistan.2011年麻疹大规模疫苗接种活动中家长的认知度与覆盖率:在巴基斯坦卡拉奇市进行的横断面调查
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP2749-56. doi: 10.1177/1010539512466567. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
4
Determinants of vaccine coverage and timeliness in a northern Pakistani village.巴基斯坦北部村庄疫苗接种覆盖率和及时性的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 17;17(2):e0263712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263712. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of the introduction of new vaccines in Guinea-Bissau on vaccine coverage, vaccine timeliness, and child survival: an observational study.几内亚比绍引入新疫苗对疫苗接种覆盖率、疫苗及时性和儿童生存的影响:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Aug;2(8):e478-87. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70274-8. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
6
Evaluating the "Zindagi Mehfooz" Electronic Immunization Registry and Suite of Digital Health Interventions to Improve the Coverage and Timeliness of Immunization Services in Sindh, Pakistan: Mixed Methods Study.评估“Zindagi Mehfooz”电子免疫登记册和一系列数字健康干预措施,以提高巴基斯坦信德省免疫服务的覆盖率和及时性:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 11;26:e52792. doi: 10.2196/52792.
7
Early two-dose measles vaccination schedule in Guinea-Bissau: good protection and coverage in infancy.几内亚比绍早期两剂次麻疹疫苗接种计划:在婴儿期提供良好的保护和覆盖率。
Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;28(2):347-52. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.2.347.
8
Routine childhood vaccination programme coverage, El Salvador, 2011-In search of timeliness.常规儿童免疫接种规划覆盖率,萨尔瓦多,2011 年-寻找及时性。
Vaccine. 2014 Jan 16;32(4):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.072. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
9
Differential coverage for vaccines in the expanded program on immunization (EPI) among children in rural Pakistan.农村巴基斯坦儿童扩大免疫规划(EPI)疫苗的差异覆盖。
Vaccine. 2023 Apr 17;41(16):2680-2689. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
The Mobile Solutions for Immunization (M-SIMU) Trial: A Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial That Assesses the Impact of Mobile Phone Delivered Reminders and Travel Subsidies to Improve Childhood Immunization Coverage Rates and Timeliness in Western Kenya.移动免疫解决方案(M-SIMU)试验:一项整群随机对照试验方案,评估通过手机发送提醒和提供出行补贴对提高肯尼亚西部儿童免疫接种覆盖率和及时性的影响。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 May 17;5(2):e72. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5030.

引用本文的文献

1
A pragmatic covariate-constrained cluster-randomised controlled trial of hybrid parents and health workers adaptive intervention for optimal (timely, cumulative age-appropriate) community-wide routine childhood immunisation coverage: the AGINTOPIC trial.一项关于混合父母与卫生工作者适应性干预以实现最佳(及时、按年龄累积适宜)社区范围内常规儿童免疫接种覆盖率的实用协变量约束整群随机对照试验:AGINTOPIC试验
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Apr 2;10(4):e017403. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017403.
2
Impact of measles vaccination strategies on vaccination rates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.麻疹疫苗接种策略对低收入和中等收入国家疫苗接种率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 10;10(2):e016647. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016647.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Immunization Noncompliance: Gauging the Cause, Effect, and Management in the School Setting.免疫接种不依从:评估学校环境中的原因、影响及管理
NASN Sch Nurse. 2019 May;34(3):140-144. doi: 10.1177/1942602X18799868. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
2
Market-testing a smartphone application for family planning: assessing potential of the CycleBeads app in seven countries through digital monitoring.对一款计划生育智能手机应用程序进行市场测试:通过数字监测评估CycleBeads应用程序在七个国家的潜力。
Mhealth. 2018 Jul 23;4:27. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.06.07. eCollection 2018.
3
Reasons for non-vaccination and incomplete vaccinations among children in Pakistan.
Analyzing the usage of theories of change for routine immunization programs -- a review of impact evaluations from LMICs.分析变化理论在常规免疫规划中的应用——对来自中低收入国家的影响评估的综述。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Sep 9;43(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00615-2.
4
Effectiveness of Catch-Up Vaccination Interventions Versus Standard or Usual Care Procedures in Increasing Adherence to Recommended Vaccinations Among Different Age Groups: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Before-After Studies.在提高不同年龄段人群对推荐疫苗接种的依从性方面,追赶接种干预措施与标准或常规护理程序相比的有效性:随机对照试验和前后研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 23;10:e52926. doi: 10.2196/52926.
5
Interventions addressing routine childhood immunization and its behavioral and social drivers.针对常规儿童免疫接种及其行为和社会驱动因素的干预措施。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 19;12:1364798. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364798. eCollection 2024.
6
Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low- and middle-income countries.改善中低收入国家儿童免疫接种覆盖率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD008145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008145.pub4.
7
Development and feasibility testing of an artificially intelligent chatbot to answer immunization-related queries of caregivers in Pakistan: A mixed-methods study.开发并测试一款人工智能聊天机器人,以回答巴基斯坦看护者有关免疫接种的问题:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jan;181:105288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105288. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
8
An assessment of the effectiveness of an electronic wristband in improving routine immunization timeliness and reducing drop-out.评估电子腕带在提高常规免疫及时性和减少流失方面的效果。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):947-956. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad134.
9
Study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of hybrid parents and health workers adaptive intervention for optimal routine childhood immunisation coverage in the communities of Ebonyi state, Nigeria: the AGINTOPIC trial protocol.尼日利亚埃邦伊州社区中混合父母和卫生工作者适应性干预以实现最佳常规儿童免疫接种覆盖率的整群随机对照试验研究方案:AGINTOPIC 试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 12;13(7):e068953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068953.
10
Timeliness of routine childhood vaccination in 103 low-and middle-income countries, 1978-2021: A scoping review to map measurement and methodological gaps.1978 - 2021年103个低收入和中等收入国家儿童常规疫苗接种的及时性:一项旨在梳理测量和方法学差距的范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;2(7):e0000325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000325. eCollection 2022.
巴基斯坦儿童未接种疫苗和未完成全程接种疫苗的原因。
Vaccine. 2018 Aug 23;36(35):5288-5293. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Vaccination timeliness and co-administration among Kenyan children.肯尼亚儿童的疫苗接种及时性和联合接种情况。
Vaccine. 2018 Mar 7;36(11):1353-1360. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.001.
5
Predictors of measles vaccination coverage among children 6-59 months of age in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.刚果民主共和国 6-59 月龄儿童麻疹疫苗接种覆盖率的预测因素。
Vaccine. 2018 Jan 25;36(4):587-593. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.049. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
A cluster randomized trial to determine the effectiveness of a novel, digital pendant and voice reminder platform on increasing infant immunization adherence in rural Udaipur, India.一项旨在确定新型数字吊坠和语音提醒平台在提高印度乌代浦农村婴儿免疫接种依从性方面有效性的整群随机试验。
Vaccine. 2018 Oct 22;36(44):6567-6577. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.023. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
7
Global Routine Vaccination Coverage, 2016.2016年全球常规疫苗接种覆盖率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Nov 17;66(45):1252-1255. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6645a3.
8
Using Mobile Phones to Improve Vaccination Uptake in 21 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review.利用手机提高21个低收入和中等收入国家的疫苗接种率:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 4;5(10):e148. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7792.
9
Reasons for defaulting from childhood immunization program: a qualitative study from Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia.儿童免疫规划脱漏原因:来自埃塞俄比亚南部哈迪亚地区的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):1240. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3904-1.
10
Using health psychology to help patients: theories of behaviour change.运用健康心理学帮助患者:行为改变理论
Br J Nurs. 2016 Sep 8;25(16):924-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.16.924.