• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国复发性或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者采用口服和静脉治疗方案的预算影响分析。

Budget impact analysis of the use of oral and intravenous therapy regimens for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in Germany.

机构信息

Takeda Pharma Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany.

Health Economics, WifOR, Darmstadt, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Dec;21(9):1351-1361. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01219-3. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-020-01219-3
PMID:32654072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7581591/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Germany, several triplet therapies for treating relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM) patients have recently been approved. While most of them are administered intravenously, ixazomib-based combination is the only orally bioavailable regimen.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a 1-year and 3-year budget impact analysis (BIA) of different novel triplets to treat patients with rrMM in second or subsequent therapy lines accounting for costs covered by German statutory health insurance (SHI).

METHODS

A 3-state partitioned survival model (PSM) was developed to evaluate the budget impact of the following regimens: carfilzomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (KRd), elotuzumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (ERd), daratumumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (DRd), and ixazomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IRd). The analysis included direct medical costs such as drug acquisition, comedication and preparation for parenteral solutions, drug administration and other 1-time costs, adverse event management costs and direct non-medical costs, such as transportation costs.

RESULTS

Based on current drug market shares in German healthcare market, the estimated costs after 1 year of treatment was €551 million (KRd), €163 million (ERd), €584 million (DRd), and €95 million (IRd). The total budget impact of €1393 million is mainly driven by drug acquisition and subsequent therapy costs.

CONCLUSION

Among the regimens of interest, the oral-based therapy regimens offered cost advantages over intravenous-based therapy regimens. The higher overall costs of intravenous therapy regimens were attributed primarily to higher drug acquisition costs.

摘要

背景

在德国,最近有几种三联疗法被批准用于治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(rrMM)患者。虽然它们大多数都是静脉给药,但基于伊沙佐米的联合用药是唯一口服生物利用的方案。

目的

针对在二线或二线以上治疗中治疗 rrMM 患者的不同新型三联疗法,进行 1 年和 3 年的预算影响分析(BIA),并考虑德国法定健康保险(SHI)涵盖的成本。

方法

开发了一个三状态分区生存模型(PSM),以评估以下方案的预算影响:卡非佐米联合来那度胺联合地塞米松(KRd)、埃罗妥珠单抗联合来那度胺联合地塞米松(ERd)、达雷妥尤单抗联合来那度胺联合地塞米松(DRd)和伊沙佐米联合来那度胺联合地塞米松(IRd)。该分析包括直接医疗成本,如药物获取、合并用药和静脉制剂准备、药物管理和其他一次性成本、不良事件管理成本以及直接非医疗成本,如交通成本。

结果

基于德国医疗保健市场目前的药物市场份额,治疗 1 年后的估计成本为 5.51 亿欧元(KRd)、1.63 亿欧元(ERd)、5.84 亿欧元(DRd)和 9500 万欧元(IRd)。13.93 亿欧元的总预算影响主要由药物获取和后续治疗成本驱动。

结论

在所关注的方案中,口服治疗方案比静脉治疗方案具有成本优势。静脉治疗方案的总体成本较高主要归因于药物获取成本较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/100b/7581591/233dc5f500dd/10198_2020_1219_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/100b/7581591/2f4e456aa0de/10198_2020_1219_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/100b/7581591/233dc5f500dd/10198_2020_1219_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/100b/7581591/2f4e456aa0de/10198_2020_1219_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/100b/7581591/233dc5f500dd/10198_2020_1219_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Budget impact analysis of the use of oral and intravenous therapy regimens for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in Germany.德国复发性或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者采用口服和静脉治疗方案的预算影响分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Dec;21(9):1351-1361. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01219-3. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
2
Estimating the Economic Impact of Adding Panobinostat to a U.S. Formulary for Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Budget Impact and Cost-Benefit Model.评估泛昔洛韦加入美国复发性和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤处方集的经济影响:预算影响和成本效益模型。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Aug;22(8):991-1002. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.8.991.
3
Comparative effectiveness of lenalidomide/dexamethasone-based triplet regimens for treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States: An analysis of real-world electronic health records data.来那度胺/地塞米松为基础的三联方案治疗美国复发性和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效比较:真实世界电子健康记录数据的分析。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2024 Jun;50:101078. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101078. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
A U.S. Cost Analysis of Triplet Regimens for Patients with Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.美国既往治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者三联方案的成本分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Apr;25(4):449-459. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.4.449.
5
Network meta-analysis of efficacy of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.伊沙佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤疗效的网状Meta分析
Hematology. 2023 Dec;28(1):2156731. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2156731.
6
Real-world comparative effectiveness of triplets containing bortezomib (B), carfilzomib (C), daratumumab (D), or ixazomib (I) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the US.美国复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)中硼替佐米(B)、卡非佐米(C)、达雷妥尤单抗(D)或伊沙佐米(I)三联方案的真实世界疗效比较。
Ann Hematol. 2021 Sep;100(9):2325-2337. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04534-8. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Cost Offsets in the Treatment Journeys of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者治疗历程中的成本抵消。
Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):477-493.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
8
Estimating the Costs of Therapy in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Model Framework.评估复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗成本:一个模型框架。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015 Jun;8(4):204-15.
9
Cost-effectiveness of adding carfilzomib to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma from a US perspective.从美国视角看,在复发多发性骨髓瘤中,将卡非佐米添加至来那度胺和地塞米松方案的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2016 Nov;19(11):1061-1074. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1194278. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Comparison of health care costs and resource utilization for commonly used proteasome inhibitor-immunomodulatory drug-based triplet regimens for the management of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the United States.比较在美国用于治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的常用蛋白酶体抑制剂-免疫调节剂药物三联方案的医疗成本和资源利用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Nov;29(11):1205-1218. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23031. Epub 2023 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of iptacopan for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.依普他单抗治疗阵发性夜间血红蛋白尿的成本效益
Blood. 2025 Jan 2;145(1):127-140. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024025176.
2
Budget Impact Analysis of CAR T-cell Therapy for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in Germany.德国复发性或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤成年患者接受CAR-T细胞疗法的预算影响分析。
Hemasphere. 2022 Jul 4;6(7):e736. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000736. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost Offsets in the Treatment Journeys of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者治疗历程中的成本抵消。
Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):477-493.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
2
Treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: which new PI-based combination treatments do patients prefer?复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤的治疗:患者更倾向于哪种基于蛋白酶体抑制剂的新联合治疗方案?
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Nov 9;12:2387-2396. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S183187. eCollection 2018.
3
Cardiotoxicity associated with carfilzomib: systematic review and meta-analysis.
与德国多发性骨髓瘤中不进行微小残留病(MRD)检测相比,clonoSEQ作为一种经过验证且获得CE认证的MRD诊断方法的成本影响分析。
Oncol Ther. 2021 Dec;9(2):607-619. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
与卡非佐米相关的心脏毒性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Nov;59(11):2557-2569. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1437269. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Reconstructing time-to-event data from published Kaplan-Meier curves.从已发表的卡普兰-迈耶曲线重建事件发生时间数据。
Stata J. 2017 Oct;17(4):786-802.
5
Prolonged Duration of Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients Treated for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Routine Clinical Care in the United States.在美国的常规临床护理中,对于复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者,延长治疗时间与生存率提高相关。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Feb;18(2):152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.012. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.多发性骨髓瘤:ESMO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv52-iv61. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx096.
7
Diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma in Germany: analysis of a nationwide multi-institutional survey.德国多发性骨髓瘤的诊断与治疗:一项全国性多机构调查分析
Ann Hematol. 2017 Jun;96(6):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-2991-0. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
8
Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Guidelines From the Mayo Stratification for Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy.复发多发性骨髓瘤的治疗:梅奥骨髓瘤分层与风险适应性治疗指南
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Apr;92(4):578-598. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
9
Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗结局的系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1312-1319. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.1663. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.达雷妥尤单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 6;375(14):1319-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751.