Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL.
Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, The University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):592-598. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
To understand social media growth in both diagnostic and interventional radiology compared to other related specialties by quantifying and comparing hashtag utilization at annual medical conferences.
Official annual conference hashtags for Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), American College of Radiology (ACR), Radiological Society of North America, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and American Society of Clinical Oncology were analyzed from 2015 to 2019, along with the IR hashtag #IRad. Twitter analytics were obtained with the use of Symplur Signals, a healthcare social media analytics platform. Linear regression analysis was performed on the number of tweets and users for each hashtag.
For annual ACR meetings, the number of tweets/user (6.96 in 2019), retweets/user (4.39 in 2019), and impressions/user (40,051 in 2019) were among the highest of all the specialties studied. This trend was observed despite a smaller number of users among ACR than most other conferences. SIR tweets increased significantly at a rate of 1032.8 tweets/year (P = 0.008) while users also significantly grew at a rate of 212.5 users/years (P = 0.007). #IRad tweets are also growing at a rate of 13,234.8 tweets/year (P = 0.026) while #IRad users are growing at a rate of 1309.5 users/year (P = 0.003). Radiological Society of North America users were significantly decreasing at -1207.1 users/year (P = 0.018).
ACR consistently had one of the highest counts of tweets/user, retweets/user, and impressions/user compared to the other studied specialties, suggesting that ACR's Twitter users are more active than users outside of the field of radiology. SIR was the only studied specialty conference that had statistically significant increases in the number of tweets and users.
通过量化和比较年度医学会议上的标签使用情况,了解诊断和介入放射学与其他相关专业相比在社交媒体上的增长情况。
分析了 2015 年至 2019 年介入放射学会(SIR)、美国放射学会(ACR)、北美放射学会、美国心脏病学会、美国心脏协会和美国临床肿瘤学会的官方年会标签,以及 IR 标签#IRad。使用 Symplur Signals(一个医疗保健社交媒体分析平台)获取了 Twitter 分析。对每个标签的推文数量和用户进行线性回归分析。
在年度 ACR 会议上,与所有研究的专业相比,标签的推文/用户数(2019 年为 6.96)、转推/用户数(2019 年为 4.39)和印象/用户数(2019 年为 40051)均处于最高水平。尽管 ACR 的用户数量比大多数其他会议少,但仍出现了这种趋势。SIR 的推文数量以每年 1032.8 条的速度显著增加(P=0.008),而用户数量也以每年 212.5 人的速度显著增长(P=0.007)。#IRad 的推文数量也以每年 13234.8 条的速度增长(P=0.026),而#IRad 的用户数量则以每年 1309.5 人的速度增长(P=0.003)。北美放射学会的用户数量以每年-1207.1 人的速度显著减少(P=0.018)。
与其他研究的专业相比,ACR 的推文/用户数、转推/用户数和印象/用户数始终是最高的,这表明 ACR 的 Twitter 用户比放射学领域之外的用户更活跃。SIR 是唯一在推文数量和用户数量上有统计学意义增长的研究专业会议。