Button Patrick, Walker Brigham
Department of Economics, School of Liberal Arts, Tulane University, NBER, and IZA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University.
Labour Econ. 2020 Aug;65. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101851. Epub 2020 May 21.
We conducted an audit study - a resume correspondence experiment - to measure discrimination in hiring faced by Indigenous Peoples in the United States (Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians). We sent employers 13,516 realistic resumes of Indigenous or white applications for common jobs in 11 cities. We signalled Indigenous status in one of four different ways. Interview offer rates do not differ by race, which holds after an extensive battery of robustness checks. We discuss multiple concerns such as the saliency of signals, selection of cities and occupations, and labour market tightness that could affect the results of our audit study and those of others. We also conduct decompositions of wages, unemployment rates, unemployment durations, and employment durations to explore if discrimination might exist in contexts outside our experiment. We conclude by highlighting the essential tests and considerations that are important for future audit studies, regardless of if they find discrimination or not.
我们进行了一项审计研究——简历对应实验,以衡量美国原住民(美洲印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民和夏威夷原住民)在招聘过程中所面临的歧视。我们向雇主发送了13516份针对11个城市常见工作的原住民或白人求职者的真实简历。我们通过四种不同方式之一表明原住民身份。面试邀请率不因种族而有所不同,在进行了一系列广泛的稳健性检验后这一结果依然成立。我们讨论了多个可能影响我们审计研究及其他研究结果的问题,比如信号的显著性、城市和职业的选择以及劳动力市场的紧张程度。我们还对工资、失业率、失业持续时间和就业持续时间进行了分解,以探究在我们实验之外的背景下是否可能存在歧视。我们最后强调了对于未来审计研究至关重要的基本检验和考虑因素,无论这些研究是否发现歧视。