Suppr超能文献

糖尿病足感染的微生物谱、抗生素敏感性概况及生物膜形成(2014 - 2018年):一项回顾性多中心分析

Microbial spectrum, antibiotic susceptibility profile, and biofilm formation of diabetic foot infections (2014-18): a retrospective multicenter analysis.

作者信息

Al-Joufi Fakhria A, Aljarallah Khalid M, Hagras Soheir A, Al Hosiny Ibrahim M, Salem-Bekhit Mounir M, Youssof Abdullah M E, Shakeel Faiyaz

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Al-Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.

College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

3 Biotech. 2020 Jul;10(7):325. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02318-x. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Abstract

This study identifies the risk factors, microbiological properties, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, mortality, and clinical complications associated with organisms causing diabetic foot infections (DFIs) with or without antibiotic treatment using data from a retrospective multicenter surveillance. Specimens collected from different hospitals were cultured and the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) excretion was estimated. The antibacterial susceptibility pattern and biofilm formation were completed along with the recommended standard methods. Overall, 792 diabetic foot patients (DFPs) were enrolled and a total of 1803 causative organisms were isolated. Polymicrobial infection was identified in 48.5% of the patients. The isolated Gram-positive pathogens (46.7%) were higher than Gram-negative (38.6%) or anaerobes (7.9%). The predominant pathogens were (22.2%), methicillin-resistant (7.7%), spp. (12.8%), (9.4%), (7.9%), spp. (7.5%), (8.9%), coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) (6.6%), anaerobic organisms (5.9%), and fungi (2.3%). Vancomycin and clindamycin exhibited no activity against Gram-positive bacteria. However, meropenem and imipenem displayed high activity against the Gram-negative isolates. Out of the 765 tested strains, 251 showed moderate (15.8%) to high (34%) level biofilm-producing phenotype. DFIs were widespread among the diabetic patients with different microbial etiology and the major organisms were aerobic organisms. Our findings may provide an insight into the development of appropriate therapeutic strategies for the management of DFIs.

摘要

本研究利用一项回顾性多中心监测的数据,确定了与导致糖尿病足感染(DFI)的微生物相关的危险因素、微生物学特性、抗菌药物敏感性模式、死亡率和临床并发症,这些感染有无接受抗生素治疗。对从不同医院收集的标本进行培养,并估计超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的排泄情况。采用推荐的标准方法完成抗菌药物敏感性模式和生物膜形成的检测。总体而言,共纳入792例糖尿病足患者(DFP),分离出1803株病原体。48.5%的患者被鉴定为多微生物感染。分离出的革兰氏阳性病原体(46.7%)多于革兰氏阴性病原体(38.6%)或厌氧菌(7.9%)。主要病原体为金黄色葡萄球菌(22.2%)、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(7.7%)、大肠埃希菌属(12.8%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(9.4%)、肠杆菌属(7.9%)、铜绿假单胞菌属(7.5%)、粪肠球菌(8.9%)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)(6.6%)、厌氧微生物(5.9%)和真菌(2.3%)。万古霉素和克林霉素对革兰氏阳性菌无活性。然而,美罗培南和亚胺培南对革兰氏阴性分离株显示出高活性。在765株测试菌株中,251株表现出中度(15.8%)至高(34%)水平的生物膜产生表型。DFI在具有不同微生物病因的糖尿病患者中广泛存在,主要病原体为需氧菌。我们的研究结果可能为制定DFI管理的适当治疗策略提供见解。

相似文献

2
A study of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Kuwait.
J Infect Public Health. 2012 Mar;5(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
5
Bacterial etiology and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of diabetic foot infections in Tabriz, Iran.
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2015 Feb 2;10:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000245. eCollection 2015.
7
Clinical and bacteriological profile of diabetic foot infections in a tertiary care.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jun 16;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00406-y.
9
Diabetic foot infections: Profile and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates in a tertiary care hospital of Oman.
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jul 30;10:254. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1552_20. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Sep 12;37(3):e0014323. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00143-23. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
4
Relative Abundance and Detection of from Chronic Wound Infections Globally.
Microorganisms. 2023 May 5;11(5):1210. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051210.
5
Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of diabetic Foot infections at Ribat University hospital; a retrospective study from Sudan.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 Oct 13;19(2):1397-1406. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00660-8. eCollection 2020 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Insight into multidrug-resistant microorganisms from microbial infected diabetic foot ulcers.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Mar-Apr;13(2):1261-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.01.044. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
3
Principles and practice of antibiotic stewardship in the management of diabetic foot infections.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;32(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000530.
6
Epidemiology of common resistant bacterial pathogens in the countries of the Arab League.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Dec;18(12):e379-e394. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30414-6. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Influence of multidrug resistant organisms on the outcome of diabetic foot infection.
Int J Infect Dis. 2018 May;70:10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes in Egypt.
Ann Glob Health. 2015 Nov-Dec;81(6):814-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.12.011.
9
Spectrum of bacteria associated with diabetic foot ulcer and biofilm formation: A prospective study.
Australas Med J. 2015 Sep 30;8(9):280-5. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2422. eCollection 2015.
10
Direct molecular versus culture-based assessment of Gram-positive cocci in biopsies of patients with major abscesses and diabetic foot infections.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Sep;34(9):1885-92. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2428-4. Epub 2015 Jul 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验