Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Parsa, Mr. Nazal, Dr. Molenaars, Agrawal, and Dr. Martin), and Orthopaedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran (Dr. Parsa).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Jun 3;4(6). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00064. eCollection 2020 Jun.
The readability, reliability, and quality of online hip preservation-related patient education materials from the top 20 orthopaedic academic centers in the United States were evaluated.
The patient educational materials were evaluated with the following assessment tools: Flesch-Kincaid (FK) readability test, Flesch Reading Ease formula, LIDA instrument, and DISCERN tool. Videos were assessed using the Patient Educational Video Assessment Tool (PEVAT), an author-developed scoring system.
A total of 121 educational items were reviewed. Median (interquartile range) or mean ± SD of the FK level, Flesch Reading Ease, LIDA, and DISCERN scores were 11.00 (3.00), 47.32 ± 12.14, 41.00 (6.00), and 64.00 (7.00), respectively. Higher ranking was correlated with higher FK (ρ = -0.21, value = 0.034), higher DISCERN score (ρ = -0.39, value < 0.005), and a lower PEVAT score (r = 0.61, value = 0.034). The PEVAT score found that 83% of videos were classified as high quality.
An analysis of the hip preservation patient education text articles found low readability. Overall, high ranking was associated with poorer readability, higher quality text content, and lower quality video content. Video content was found to be predominantly of high quality. Improving the educational accessibility and effect of hip preservation-related topics may result in improved treatment outcomes.
评估了美国排名前 20 的骨科学术中心的在线髋关节保护相关患者教育资料的可读性、可靠性和质量。
使用以下评估工具评估患者教育材料:弗莱什-金凯德(Flesch-Kincaid,FK)可读性测试、弗莱什阅读舒适度公式、LIDA 仪器和 DISCERN 工具。使用作者开发的评分系统,即患者教育视频评估工具(Patient Educational Video Assessment Tool,PEVAT)评估视频。
共审查了 121 个教育项目。FK 水平、弗莱什阅读舒适度、LIDA 和 DISCERN 评分的中位数(四分位距或均值±标准差)分别为 11.00(3.00)、47.32±12.14、41.00(6.00)和 64.00(7.00)。较高的排名与较高的 FK(ρ=-0.21, 值=0.034)、较高的 DISCERN 评分(ρ=-0.39, 值<0.005)和较低的 PEVAT 评分(r=0.61, 值=0.034)相关。PEVAT 评分发现,83%的视频被归类为高质量。
对髋关节保护患者教育文本文章的分析发现,可读性较低。总体而言,较高的排名与较差的可读性、更高质量的文本内容和较低质量的视频内容相关。视频内容主要为高质量。提高与髋关节保护相关主题的教育可及性和效果可能会改善治疗结果。