• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国骨科医师学会和北美关节镜协会网站上有关关节镜相关患者教育资料的可读性。

Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites.

机构信息

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003
PMID:23726111
Abstract

We sought to assess the readability levels of arthroscopy-related patient education materials available on the Web sites of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA). We identified all articles related to arthroscopy available in 2012 from the online patient education libraries of AAOS and AANA. After performing follow-up editing, we assessed each article with the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) readability test. Mean readability levels of the articles from the AAOS Web site and the AANA Web site were compared. We also determined the number of articles with readability levels at or below the eighth-grade level (the average reading ability of the US adult population) and sixth-grade level (the widely recommended level for patient education materials). Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability of FK grade assessment were evaluated. A total of 62 articles were reviewed (43 from AAOS and 19 from AANA). The mean overall FK grade level was 10.2 (range, 5.2 to 12). The AAOS articles had a mean FK grade level of 9.6 (range, 5.2 to 12), whereas the AANA articles had a mean FK grade level of 11.4 (range, 8.7 to 12); the difference was significant (P < .0001). Only 3 articles had a readability level at or below the eighth-grade level and only 1 was at or below the sixth-grade level; all were from AAOS. Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient of 1 for both). Online patient education materials related to arthroscopy from AAOS and AANA may be written at a level too difficult for a large portion of the patient population to comprehend.

摘要

我们旨在评估美国骨科医师学会 (AAOS) 和北美关节镜协会 (AANA) 网站上提供的与关节镜相关的患者教育材料的可读性水平。我们从 AAOS 和 AANA 的在线患者教育库中确定了 2012 年所有与关节镜相关的文章。在进行后续编辑后,我们使用弗莱什-金凯德 (FK) 可读性测试评估了每篇文章。比较了 AAOS 网站和 AANA 网站文章的平均可读性水平。我们还确定了具有八年级水平(美国成年人口的平均阅读能力)或六年级水平(患者教育材料的广泛推荐水平)以下的可读性水平的文章数量。评估 FK 等级的观察者内可靠性和观察者间可靠性。共审查了 62 篇文章(43 篇来自 AAOS,19 篇来自 AANA)。总体 FK 等级平均为 10.2(范围为 5.2 至 12)。AAOS 文章的 FK 等级平均值为 9.6(范围为 5.2 至 12),而 AANA 文章的 FK 等级平均值为 11.4(范围为 8.7 至 12);差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。只有 3 篇文章的可读性水平达到或低于八年级水平,只有 1 篇文章的可读性水平达到或低于六年级水平;均来自 AAOS。观察者内可靠性和观察者间可靠性均为优秀(两者的组内相关系数均为 1)。AAOS 和 AANA 的在线患者教育材料可能针对的是难以理解的大部分患者人群。

相似文献

1
Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美关节镜协会网站上有关关节镜相关患者教育资料的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003.
2
Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Materials From Leading Orthopedic Academic Centers.来自领先骨科学术中心的脊柱相关患者教育材料的可读性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(9):E561-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001321.
3
Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美小儿骨科学会网站上患者教育资料的可读性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):199-204. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00347.
4
Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.美国矫形外科医师学会的大多数在线患者教育材料超过了普通患者的阅读水平。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4071-2. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
5
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.美国矫形外科医师学会患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00658.
6
Readability of Trauma-related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Trauma Association Websites.美国矫形外科医师学会和创伤骨科协会网站上创伤相关患者教育材料的可读性。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul 1;32(13):e642-e650. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00449. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
7
Readability of sports medicine-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.美国矫形外科医师学会和美国运动医学矫形外科学会的运动医学相关患者教育材料的可读性。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Apr;43(4):E65-8.
8
Readability of Orthopaedic Oncology-related Patient Education Materials Available on the Internet.互联网上骨科肿瘤相关患者教育材料的可读性
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):783-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00324. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.脊柱相关患者教育资料的易读性:来自专业组织和脊柱医生网站的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c.
10
Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.骨科网站上肩部和肘部患者教育材料的可读性比较
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73(4):249-56.

引用本文的文献

1
The readability of online English and Spanish patient education materials on anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery.在线英文和西班牙文骨科手术麻醉患者教育材料的可读性。
BJA Open. 2025 Mar 27;14:100388. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100388. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Readability of Orthopaedic Patient Educational Material: An artificial intelligence application.骨科患者教育材料的可读性:一项人工智能应用。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 12;64:102971. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102971. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Is Information About Musculoskeletal Malignancies From Large Language Models or Web Resources at a Suitable Reading Level for Patients?
来自大语言模型或网络资源的关于肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤的信息对患者来说是否处于合适的阅读水平?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):306-315. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003263. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
4
Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.关于后交叉韧带重建的在线患者教育材料的可读性和质量
Cureus. 2024 Apr 19;16(4):e58618. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58618. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Evaluating the Readability of Patient Education Materials for Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering, Distraction-Based Methods, and Posterior Spinal Fusion for the Treatment of Pediatric Spinal Deformity.评估用于治疗小儿脊柱畸形的前路椎体束缚术、基于牵引的方法及后路脊柱融合术的患者教育材料的可读性。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):178-185. doi: 10.14444/8591.
6
Readability assessment of patient educational materials for pediatric spinal conditions from top academic orthopedic institutions.顶级学术骨科机构针对小儿脊柱疾病的患者教育材料可读性评估
J Child Orthop. 2023 May 16;17(3):284-290. doi: 10.1177/18632521231156435. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Systematic Assessment of the Quality and Comprehensibility of YouTube Content on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury and Management.YouTube上关于尺侧副韧带损伤与治疗内容的质量及可理解性的系统评估
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Mar 21;11(3):23259671221147921. doi: 10.1177/23259671221147921. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Content Analysis of Patient-Facing Information Related to Preeclampsia.患者相关信息的内容分析与先兆子痫。
Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jan-Feb;33(1):77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
9
Impingement on the internet: evaluating the quality and readability of online subacromial impingement information.互联网上的信息冲击:评估在线肩峰下撞击症信息的质量和可读性。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Nov 3;7(4):e001203. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001203. eCollection 2021.
10
Evaluation of Hip Preservation-related Patient Education Materials From Leading Orthopaedic Academic Centers in the United States and Description of a Novel Video Assessment Tool.美国领先的骨科学术中心的髋关节保护相关患者教育材料评估及新型视频评估工具的描述。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Jun 3;4(6). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00064. eCollection 2020 Jun.