Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003.
We sought to assess the readability levels of arthroscopy-related patient education materials available on the Web sites of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA). We identified all articles related to arthroscopy available in 2012 from the online patient education libraries of AAOS and AANA. After performing follow-up editing, we assessed each article with the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) readability test. Mean readability levels of the articles from the AAOS Web site and the AANA Web site were compared. We also determined the number of articles with readability levels at or below the eighth-grade level (the average reading ability of the US adult population) and sixth-grade level (the widely recommended level for patient education materials). Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability of FK grade assessment were evaluated. A total of 62 articles were reviewed (43 from AAOS and 19 from AANA). The mean overall FK grade level was 10.2 (range, 5.2 to 12). The AAOS articles had a mean FK grade level of 9.6 (range, 5.2 to 12), whereas the AANA articles had a mean FK grade level of 11.4 (range, 8.7 to 12); the difference was significant (P < .0001). Only 3 articles had a readability level at or below the eighth-grade level and only 1 was at or below the sixth-grade level; all were from AAOS. Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient of 1 for both). Online patient education materials related to arthroscopy from AAOS and AANA may be written at a level too difficult for a large portion of the patient population to comprehend.
我们旨在评估美国骨科医师学会 (AAOS) 和北美关节镜协会 (AANA) 网站上提供的与关节镜相关的患者教育材料的可读性水平。我们从 AAOS 和 AANA 的在线患者教育库中确定了 2012 年所有与关节镜相关的文章。在进行后续编辑后,我们使用弗莱什-金凯德 (FK) 可读性测试评估了每篇文章。比较了 AAOS 网站和 AANA 网站文章的平均可读性水平。我们还确定了具有八年级水平(美国成年人口的平均阅读能力)或六年级水平(患者教育材料的广泛推荐水平)以下的可读性水平的文章数量。评估 FK 等级的观察者内可靠性和观察者间可靠性。共审查了 62 篇文章(43 篇来自 AAOS,19 篇来自 AANA)。总体 FK 等级平均为 10.2(范围为 5.2 至 12)。AAOS 文章的 FK 等级平均值为 9.6(范围为 5.2 至 12),而 AANA 文章的 FK 等级平均值为 11.4(范围为 8.7 至 12);差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。只有 3 篇文章的可读性水平达到或低于八年级水平,只有 1 篇文章的可读性水平达到或低于六年级水平;均来自 AAOS。观察者内可靠性和观察者间可靠性均为优秀(两者的组内相关系数均为 1)。AAOS 和 AANA 的在线患者教育材料可能针对的是难以理解的大部分患者人群。