Smirnov S A, Aĭzikov G S, Kozlovskaia I B
Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med. 1988 Jul-Aug;22(4):35-9.
The effect of biofeedback control on motion sickness symptoms was investigated in 27 test subjects with different susceptibility who had been trained to regulate their skin resistance and skin temperature. The efficacy of two schemes was compared: scheme 1 - transfer of controlling abilities, and scheme 2 - application of biofeedback during vestibular stimulation. Use of either scheme inhibited significantly the severity of motion sickness symptoms in moderate susceptibility individuals; in other words, this decreased respiratory arrhythmia, skin galvanic response, heart rate and objective motion sickness manifestations, i.e. nausea, paleness, perspiration. This caused vestibular tolerance to increase by 50% to 150% as compared to the baseline. Biofeedback control proved ineffective in high susceptibility individuals. Scheme 2 was found to be more effective than scheme 1. Biofeedback control of skin resistance had a stronger inhibitory effect than that of skin temperature. These results suggest that the prophylactic effect of biofeedback control is associated with the regulation of a component of the complex autonomic reaction triggered as a single program during motion sickness.
对27名不同易感性的受试者进行了生物反馈控制对晕动病症状影响的研究,这些受试者已接受训练来调节皮肤电阻和皮肤温度。比较了两种方案的效果:方案1——控制能力的转移,方案2——在前庭刺激期间应用生物反馈。两种方案的使用均显著抑制了中度易感性个体晕动病症状的严重程度;也就是说,这降低了呼吸性心律失常、皮肤电反应、心率以及客观的晕动病表现,即恶心、面色苍白、出汗。与基线相比,这使前庭耐受性提高了50%至150%。生物反馈控制在高易感性个体中被证明无效。发现方案2比方案1更有效。皮肤电阻的生物反馈控制比皮肤温度的生物反馈控制具有更强的抑制作用。这些结果表明,生物反馈控制的预防作用与对晕动病期间作为一个单一程序触发的复杂自主反应的一个组成部分的调节有关。