Matsnev E I, Kuz'min M P, Zakharova L N
Institute of Biomedical Problems, Moscow, USSR.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1987 Oct;58(10):954-7.
The contribution of vestibular, optokinetic, and optovestibular stimulation to experimental motion sickness was evaluated in 29 volunteer subjects. Vestibular stimulation (Coriolis effect) was found to induce the most significant vestibular-autonomic disorders. Optokinetic stimulation (pseudo-Coriolis effect) and optovestibular stimulation could provoke such disorders only in susceptible subjects. In quantitative terms, optokinetic and optovestibular stimulation were less effective than vestibular Coriolis stress. Nystagmic reactions of susceptible subjects to the three types of stimulation differed significantly from those of tolerant subjects. This may be important from the theoretical point of view because susceptibility to motion sickness and responses to vestibular and optokinetic stimulation may be universal and associated with the general CNS mechanism, i.e. inhibition mechanism. The identified correlation between the duration of postoptokinetic illusion and motion sickness susceptibility may be used to differentiate susceptible and tolerant subjects.
在29名志愿者中评估了前庭、视动和视前庭刺激对实验性晕动病的影响。发现前庭刺激(科里奥利效应)会诱发最显著的前庭自主神经紊乱。视动刺激(伪科里奥利效应)和视前庭刺激仅在易感受试者中会引发此类紊乱。从数量上看,视动和视前庭刺激比前庭科里奥利应激的效果要差。易感受试者对这三种刺激的眼球震颤反应与耐受受试者的反应有显著差异。从理论角度来看,这可能很重要,因为晕动病易感性以及对前庭和视动刺激的反应可能具有普遍性,并且与一般的中枢神经系统机制即抑制机制有关。所确定的视动后错觉持续时间与晕动病易感性之间的相关性可用于区分易感和耐受受试者。