Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen.
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University.
Emotion. 2022 Aug;22(5):836-843. doi: 10.1037/emo0000778. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Emotional complexity (EC) involves the ability to distinguish between distinct emotions (differentiation) and the experience of a large range of emotions (diversity). Lower EC has been related to psychopathology in cross-sectional studies. This study aimed to investigate (a) whether EC prospectively predicts psychopathology and (b) whether this effect is contingent on stressful life events. To further explore EC, we compared the effects of differentiation and diversity. Adolescents from the general population ( = 401) rated 8 negatively valenced emotions 10 times a day for 6 consecutive days. Further, they completed the Symptom Checklist-90 (baseline and 1-year follow-up) and a questionnaire on past year's life events at follow-up. Logistic regression analyses tested whether EC-reflected by emotion differentiation (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) and diversity (diversity index [DI])-predicted prognosis (good: remitting or lacking symptoms vs. bad: worsening or persisting symptoms). EC predicted prognoses but only when based on the ICC ( = 1.42, = .02). An 1 above average increased the probability of good prognosis from .67 to .74. This effect was not related to stressful life events ( × Life events = 1.03, = .86) and disappeared when emotion intensity (mean level) was taken into account ( = 1.20, = .20). Predicting future prognosis does not necessitate complex measures of emotional experience (ICC, DI) but rather might be achieved through simpler indices (mean). The discrepant effects of the ICC and DI on prognosis suggest that impaired emotion representation (ICC) plays a more important role in vulnerability to mental ill health than does low diversity of emotions (DI). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
情绪复杂性(EC)包括区分不同情绪(分化)和体验广泛情绪(多样性)的能力。横断面研究表明,较低的 EC 与精神病理学有关。本研究旨在调查:(a)EC 是否能预测精神病理学,以及(b)这种影响是否取决于压力性生活事件。为了进一步探索 EC,我们比较了分化和多样性的影响。一般人群中的青少年(n=401)在连续 6 天内每天 10 次对 8 种负性情绪进行评分。此外,他们在随访时完成了症状清单 90(基线和 1 年随访)和过去一年生活事件的问卷。逻辑回归分析测试了 EC(情绪分化的组内相关系数[ICC]和多样性的多样性指数[DI])是否能预测预后(好:缓解或缺乏症状与差:恶化或持续症状)。EC 可以预测预后,但仅基于 ICC( = 1.42, =.02)。高于平均水平 1 分可将良好预后的概率从 0.67 提高到 0.74。这种效果与压力性生活事件无关(×生活事件= 1.03, =.86),当考虑情绪强度(平均水平)时,这种效果就消失了( = 1.20, =.20)。预测未来的预后并不需要复杂的情绪体验指标(ICC、DI),而可能通过更简单的指标(平均值)来实现。ICC 和 DI 对预后的不同影响表明,情绪表达受损(ICC)在易患心理健康问题方面比情绪多样性低(DI)发挥更重要的作用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。