• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无助体验与有意(非)联结:控制剥夺会扰乱行动的内隐感觉。

Helplessness experience and intentional (un-)binding: Control deprivation disrupts the implicit sense of agency.

作者信息

Soral Wiktor, Kofta Mirosław, Bukowski Marcin

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology.

Institute of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Feb;150(2):289-305. doi: 10.1037/xge0000791. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000791
PMID:32658528
Abstract

Prolonged deprivation of personal control induces cognitive, motivational, and affective impairments that can lead to learned helplessness syndrome. Research on cognitive mechanisms involved in responding to uncontrollable events reveals a critical role of lack of contingency between one's action and outcomes. However, the impact of experienced uncontrollability on individuals' sense of self-agency has not been explored yet. This research examined how prolonged control deprivation affects implicit sense of agency. We exposed participants to action-outcome noncontingency of varying lengths and measured implicit sense of self-agency manifested in intentional binding. In 2 studies ( = 133 and = 354, respectively), we found that control deprivation decreased the intentional binding effect, and that the relationship appeared to be monotonic: the longer the control deprivation, the smaller the intentional binding effect. Moreover, in the condition of prolonged control deprivation, no intentional binding was observed at all: Participants evaluated the time elapsing between the action and the effect as if both occurred separately. Our finding suggests that long-term exposure to uncontrollability has detrimental effects on the ability to detect consequences of one's actions, the basis of implicit self-agency. The implications of our results for the theory of control deprivation and sense of agency are thoroughly discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

长期丧失个人控制权会引发认知、动机和情感障碍,进而可能导致习得性无助综合征。对应对不可控事件所涉及的认知机制的研究表明,个人行为与结果之间缺乏关联性起着关键作用。然而,经历不可控性对个体自我能动性的影响尚未得到探讨。本研究考察了长期丧失控制权如何影响内隐能动性。我们让参与者接触不同时长的行为 - 结果非关联性,并测量在意图绑定中表现出的内隐自我能动性。在两项研究中(分别为(n = 133)和(n = 354)),我们发现丧失控制权会降低意图绑定效应,且这种关系似乎是单调的:丧失控制权的时间越长,意图绑定效应越小。此外,在长期丧失控制权的情况下,根本没有观察到意图绑定:参与者评估行为与结果之间的时间间隔时,就好像两者是分别发生的。我们的研究结果表明,长期暴露于不可控性会对察觉自身行为后果的能力产生不利影响,而这种能力是内隐自我能动性的基础。我们将深入讨论研究结果对控制权剥夺理论和能动性的意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录 (c) 2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Helplessness experience and intentional (un-)binding: Control deprivation disrupts the implicit sense of agency.无助体验与有意(非)联结:控制剥夺会扰乱行动的内隐感觉。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Feb;150(2):289-305. doi: 10.1037/xge0000791. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
2
Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency.对外部世界的掌控会增强内在的能动感。
Cognition. 2017 May;162:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
The influence of action-outcome contingency on motivation from control.行动-结果偶然性对来自控制的动机的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Dec;236(12):3239-3249. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5374-4. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
4
The role of the temporoparietal junction in implicit and explicit sense of agency.颞顶联合区在内隐和外显主体意识中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 May;113:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
5
The influence of performance on action-effect integration in sense of agency.表现对能动感中动作-效应整合的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Musical expertise affects the sense of agency: Intentional binding in expert pianists.音乐专业知识影响主体感:钢琴专家的意图绑定。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Sep;84:102984. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102984. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
7
Power to the will: how exerting physical effort boosts the sense of agency.意志力的力量:体力付出如何增强主体感。
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):574-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
The influence of action-outcome delay and arousal on sense of agency and the intentional binding effect.动作-结果延迟和唤醒对 agency 感及意图绑定效应的影响。 (注:这里“agency”在心理学等领域有特定含义,可译为“能动感”等,具体可根据上下文进一步确定准确表述)
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Intentional binding coincides with explicit sense of agency.意图绑定与明确的主体感一致。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Jan;67:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
Acting and reacting: Is intentional binding due to sense of agency or to temporal expectancy?动作与反应:有意绑定是由于主体感还是时间预期?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jan;46(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000700. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The descent of agamemnon and the disquietude of job: The death of agency as the spur of suicide.阿伽门农的堕落与约伯的不安:作为自杀诱因的能动性之死。
Psychol Rev. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1037/rev0000559.
2
Rejecting unfairness enhances the implicit sense of agency in the human brain.拒绝不公平会增强人类大脑的内隐主体感。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):22822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74833-3.
3
Sense of agency and its disturbances: A systematic review targeting the intentional binding effect in neuropsychiatric disorders.主体感及其障碍:针对神经精神障碍中意图绑定效应的系统综述。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jan;78(1):3-18. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13601. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
Increased temporal binding during voluntary motor task under local anesthesia.在局部麻醉下进行自愿运动任务时,时间绑定增加。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 4;13(1):14504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40591-x.
5
Reward-related self-agency is disturbed in depression and anxiety.奖励相关的自我归因在抑郁和焦虑中受到干扰。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282727. eCollection 2023.
6
How Does COVID-19 Risk Perception Affect Sense of Control? The Roles of Death Anxiety and Confucian Coping.新冠疫情风险感知如何影响控制感?死亡焦虑和儒家应对方式的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2299. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032299.
7
A Two-Person Neuroscience Approach for Social Anxiety: A Paradigm With Interbrain Synchrony and Neurofeedback.一种用于社交焦虑的双人神经科学方法:一种具有脑间同步和神经反馈的范式。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 14;12:568921. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.568921. eCollection 2021.
8
A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model.期望违背情境下期望更新与维持的调查修订框架:ViolEx 2.0模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 11;12:726432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726432. eCollection 2021.
9
Not All in the Same Boat. Socioeconomic Differences in Marital Stress and Satisfaction During the Covid-19 Pandemic.并非同舟共济。新冠疫情期间婚姻压力与满意度的社会经济差异
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 31;12:635148. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635148. eCollection 2021.