• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性传播感染检测结果和面对面咨询对后续行为和心理特征的影响。

The impact of STI test results and face-to-face consultations on subsequent behavior and psychological characteristics.

机构信息

Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2020 Oct;139:106200. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106200. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106200
PMID:32659244
Abstract

Sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing without face-to-face counselling is increasingly offered at sexual health centers (SHC), and ordering self-sampling tests online is becoming more popular. However, the impact of testing without counselling on behavior is unknown. We examine the impact of STI testing with and without consultation and the combined effect of a positive test result and treatment consultation, on behavioral and psychological characteristics over time. Data from a longitudinal study among heterosexual SHC visitors aged 18-24 years was used. The impact of a test consultation (participants who tested chlamydia negative with vs. without consultation) and treatment consultation/positive test result (participants who tested chlamydia positive vs. negative), was assessed by comparing behavioral and psychological characteristics before testing (baseline), and at three-week and six-month follow-up, using generalized estimating equation models. Changes after testing were similar between participants who tested chlamydia negative with and without test consultation, namely decreased risk perception, shame, number of partners, and increased knowledge. However, participants who tested chlamydia positive reported stronger increases in health goals and intentions towards condom use, and stronger decreases in the number of partners and stigma, compared to participants who tested negative. Furthermore, condom use increased in chlamydia positive, and decreased in chlamydia negative participants. A treatment consultation/positive test result had a risk-reducing impact on behavioral and psychological characteristics, whereas the impact of a test consultation was limited. Since the majority of young heterosexuals test chlamydia negative, alternative interventions (e.g., online) achieving risk-reducing behavior change targeted to individuals who tested negative are needed.

摘要

性传播感染(STI)检测无需面对面咨询,在性健康中心(SHC)中越来越常见,而在线订购自我采样检测也越来越受欢迎。然而,这种检测方式对行为的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了有无咨询的 STI 检测以及检测结果阳性和接受治疗咨询的综合效应,对性行为和心理特征随时间的变化影响。本研究的数据来自一项对 18-24 岁异性 SHC 访客的纵向研究。通过比较检测前(基线)、检测后 3 周和 6 个月的行为和心理特征,评估了检测咨询(接受衣原体检测且有无咨询的参与者)和治疗咨询/阳性检测结果(检测出衣原体阳性和阴性的参与者)的影响,采用广义估计方程模型。无论是否进行检测咨询,检测出衣原体阴性的参与者在风险感知、羞耻感、性伴侣数量和知识水平等方面都有所下降,而检测出衣原体阳性的参与者在健康目标和使用安全套的意愿方面的增加更为显著,性伴侣数量和耻辱感的减少更为显著。此外,衣原体阳性参与者的安全套使用率有所增加,而衣原体阴性参与者的安全套使用率则有所下降。治疗咨询/阳性检测结果对行为和心理特征具有降低风险的影响,而检测咨询的影响则较为有限。鉴于大多数年轻异性恋者检测出衣原体阴性,需要开发其他干预措施(如在线干预),针对检测结果为阴性的个体,以实现降低风险的行为改变。

相似文献

1
The impact of STI test results and face-to-face consultations on subsequent behavior and psychological characteristics.性传播感染检测结果和面对面咨询对后续行为和心理特征的影响。
Prev Med. 2020 Oct;139:106200. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106200. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
2
Study protocol of the iMPaCT project: a longitudinal cohort study assessing psychological determinants, sexual behaviour and chlamydia (re)infections in heterosexual STI clinic visitors.iMPaCT 项目研究方案:一项评估异性性传播感染门诊就诊者心理决定因素、性行为和衣原体(再)感染的纵向队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3498-6.
3
Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis testing among heterosexual STI outpatient clinic visitors in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study.荷兰异性传播感染门诊就诊者中沙眼衣原体检测的重复检测:一项纵向研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):782. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2871-1.
4
Longitudinal Patterns of Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk Based on Psychological Characteristics and Sexual Behavior in Heterosexual Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Visitors.基于心理特征和性行为的异性性传播感染门诊就诊者的性传播感染风险的纵向模式。
Sex Transm Dis. 2020 Mar;47(3):171-176. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001110.
5
Subsequent sexually transmitted infections among adolescent women with genital infection due to Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or Trichomonas vaginalis.沙眼衣原体、淋病奈瑟菌或阴道毛滴虫引起生殖器感染的青春期女性后续的性传播感染。
Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Jan;26(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199901000-00005.
6
Partner notification for chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections: eight years of patient referral experience in the major Portuguese sexually transmitted infections clinic, 2000-07.沙眼衣原体泌尿生殖系统感染的性伴通知:2000年至2007年葡萄牙主要性传播感染诊所八年的患者转诊经验
Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Oct;22(10):548-51. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.010268.
7
HIV/Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention Messaging: Targeting Root Causes of Sexual Risk Behavior.艾滋病毒/性传播感染预防宣传:针对性风险行为的根本原因
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Feb;43(2):71-77. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000402.
8
Evaluation of the Implementation of a New Nurse-Led Express "Test-And-Go" Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Service for Men Who Have Sex With Men at a Sexual Health Center in Melbourne, Australia.评价澳大利亚墨尔本一家性健康中心实施的新的由护士主导的快速“检测即走”艾滋病毒/性传播感染检测服务在男男性行为人群中的实施情况。
Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Jun;45(6):429-434. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000777.
9
Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service.新型在线性传播感染结果服务的混合方法评估。
Sex Transm Infect. 2018 Dec;94(8):622-624. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053318. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Identifying relationships between high-risk sexual behaviors and screening positive for chlamydia and gonorrhea in school-wide screening events.在全校范围内的筛查活动中,识别高危性行为与衣原体和淋病筛查阳性之间的关系。
J Sch Health. 2013 Feb;83(2):99-104. doi: 10.1111/josh.12004.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaccination as a strategy for Chlamydia trachomatis control: a global mathematical modeling analysis.接种疫苗作为沙眼衣原体控制策略:一项全球数学建模分析
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 25;3(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00181-7.
2
Impact of a potential Chlamydia vaccine in the USA: mathematical modelling analyses.一种潜在的衣原体疫苗在美国的影响:数学建模分析。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jan 31;2(1):e000345. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000345. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Contextualized Experiences and Predictors of Condom Use in a Flemish Population: A Mixed Methods Study.
弗拉芒人群中情境化的避孕套使用经历及预测因素:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;21(12):1545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121545.
4
The Best Predictor of Future Behavior May Be the Past: Exploring Behavior Change in Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the Netherlands.未来行为的最佳预测指标可能是过去:探索在荷兰使用暴露前预防措施的男男性行为者中的行为变化。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2777-2793. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02863-z. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Cultural Predictors of Self-Esteem Among Black Women With Criminal Justice Involvement and Herpes Simplex Virus.文化因素对有刑事司法涉案经历的黑人女性的自尊的影响及其与单纯疱疹病毒的关系。
Health Promot Pract. 2024 Nov;25(6):1023-1031. doi: 10.1177/15248399231171951. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
6
Patterns of sexual behaviour associated with repeated chlamydia testing and infection in men and women: a latent class analysis.与男性和女性反复衣原体检测和感染相关的性行为模式:潜在类别分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12394-0.
7
Time for change: Transitions between HIV risk levels and determinants of behavior change in men who have sex with men.改变的时机:男男性行为者的 HIV 风险水平和行为变化决定因素之间的转变。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 9;16(12):e0259913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259913. eCollection 2021.
8
Where to go to in chlamydia control? From infection control towards infectious disease control.淋病防治何去何从?从感染控制走向传染病控制。
Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Nov;97(7):501-506. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-054992. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Modelling the impact of tailored behavioural interventions on chlamydia transmission.针对衣原体传播的定制行为干预措施的影响建模。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):2148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81675-w.