Scholey Andrew, Ayre Elizabeth, Stock Ann-Kathrin, Verster Joris C, Benson Sarah
Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 9;9(7):2175. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072175.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of putative hangover treatment, Rapid Recovery, in mitigating alcohol hangover (AH) symptom severity. Using a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, balanced crossover design, 20 participants attended the laboratory for two evenings of alcohol consumption, each followed by morning assessments of AH severity. Participants were administered Rapid Recovery and placebo on separate visits. In the first testing visit, participants self-administered alcoholic beverages of their choice, to a maximum of 1.3 g/kg alcohol. Drinking patterns were recorded and replicated in the second evening testing visit. In the morning visits, AH severity was assessed using questionnaires measuring AH symptom severity and sleep quality, computerized assessments of cognitive functioning as well as levels of blood biomarkers of liver function (gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT)) and inflammation (high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)). There were no differences in the blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) obtained in the Rapid Recovery (mean = 0.096%) and placebo (mean = 0.097%) conditions. Participants reported significantly greater sleep problems in the Rapid Recovery compared to placebo condition, although this difference was no longer significant following Bonferroni's correction. There were no other significant differences between Rapid Recovery and placebo. These data suggest that Rapid Recovery has no significant effect on alcohol hangover nor on associated biomarkers.
本研究的目的是评估一种假定的解酒疗法“快速恢复”在减轻酒精性宿醉(AH)症状严重程度方面的疗效。采用双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、平衡交叉设计,20名参与者在两个晚上到实验室饮酒,每次饮酒后次日上午评估AH严重程度。参与者在不同的访视中分别服用“快速恢复”和安慰剂。在第一次测试访视中,参与者自行饮用他们选择的酒精饮料,酒精摄入量最高为1.3 g/kg。记录饮酒模式,并在第二个晚上的测试访视中重复。在上午的访视中,使用测量AH症状严重程度和睡眠质量的问卷、认知功能的计算机化评估以及肝功能血液生物标志物(γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT))和炎症(高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP))水平来评估AH严重程度。在“快速恢复”组(平均 = 0.096%)和安慰剂组(平均 = 0.097%)中获得的血液酒精浓度(BAC)没有差异。与安慰剂组相比,参与者报告在“快速恢复”组中睡眠问题明显更多,尽管在Bonferroni校正后这种差异不再显著。“快速恢复”组和安慰剂组之间没有其他显著差异。这些数据表明,“快速恢复”对酒精性宿醉及其相关生物标志物没有显著影响。