Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Whittall Street Clinic, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 26;22(8):e17667. doi: 10.2196/17667.
Internet-based testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) allows asymptomatic individuals to order a self-sampling kit online and receive their results electronically, reducing the need to attend a clinic unless for treatment. This approach has become increasingly common; however, there is evidence that barriers exist to accessing it, particularly among some high-risk populations. We review the qualitative evidence on this topic, as qualitative research is well-placed to identify the complex influences that relate to accessing testing.
This paper aims to explore perceptions and experiences of internet-based testing for STIs among users and potential users.
Searches were run through 5 electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) to identify peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2018. Search terms were drawn from 4 categories: STIs, testing or screening, digital health, and qualitative methods. Included studies were conducted in high-income countries and explored patient perceptions or experiences of internet-based testing, and data underwent thematic synthesis.
A total of 11 studies from the 1735 studies identified in the initial search were included in the review. The synthesis identified that internet-based testing is viewed widely as being acceptable and is preferred over clinic testing by many individuals due to perceived convenience and anonymity. However, a number of studies identified concerns relating to test accuracy and lack of communication with practitioners, particularly when receiving results. There was a lack of consensus on preferred media for results delivery, although convenience and confidentiality were again strong influencing factors. The majority of included studies were limited by the fact that they researched hypothetical services.
Internet-based testing providers may benefit from emphasizing this testing's comparative convenience and privacy compared with face-to-face testing in order to improve uptake, as well as alleviating concerns about the self-sampling process. There is a clear need for further research exploring in depth the perceptions and experiences of people who have accessed internet-based testing and for research on internet-based testing that explicitly gathers the views of populations that are at high risk of STIs.
PROSPERO CRD42019146938; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=146938.
基于互联网的性传播感染(STI)检测使无症状个体能够在线订购自采样套件,并通过电子方式接收检测结果,从而减少了前往诊所就诊的需求,除非需要接受治疗。这种方法已经越来越普遍;然而,有证据表明,人们在获取检测服务方面存在障碍,尤其是在一些高危人群中。我们对这一主题的定性证据进行了回顾,因为定性研究能够很好地确定与获取检测相关的复杂影响因素。
本文旨在探讨互联网 STI 检测在使用者和潜在使用者中的看法和体验。
通过 5 个电子数据库(CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science)进行检索,以确定 2005 年至 2018 年期间发表的同行评审研究。检索词来自 4 个类别:性传播感染、检测或筛查、数字健康和定性方法。纳入的研究在高收入国家进行,探讨了患者对互联网检测的看法或体验,数据经过主题综合分析。
在最初搜索中确定的 1735 项研究中,共有 11 项研究被纳入综述。综合分析结果表明,由于便利性和匿名性,互联网检测被广泛认为是可以接受的,并且许多人更喜欢这种检测方式而不是诊所检测。然而,一些研究发现,人们对检测的准确性和与医生沟通的缺乏表示担忧,尤其是在收到检测结果时。虽然便利性和保密性仍然是重要的影响因素,但对于结果传递的首选媒体仍存在分歧。纳入的大多数研究都受到这样一个事实的限制,即它们研究的是假设性服务。
互联网检测服务提供商可以通过强调与面对面检测相比,这种检测具有相对的便利性和隐私性,来提高检测的采用率,同时缓解人们对自我采样过程的担忧。需要进一步研究深入探讨已经使用过互联网检测的人群的看法和体验,以及明确收集性传播感染高危人群意见的互联网检测研究。
PROSPERO CRD42019146938;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=146938.