Suppr超能文献

人们会怎么想?感知到的社会规范、愿意充当代理人以及临终治疗决策。

What would people think? Perceived social norms, willingness to serve as a surrogate, and end-of-life treatment decisions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, MorgantownWV, USA.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2021 Feb;19(1):46-54. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000401.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Population aging has increased the prevalence of surrogate decision making in healthcare settings. However, little is known about factors contributing to the decision to become a surrogate and the surrogate medical decision-making process in general. We investigated how intrapersonal and social-contextual factors predicted two components of the surrogate decision-making process: individuals' willingness to serve as a surrogate and their tendency to select various end-of-life treatments, including mechanical ventilation and palliative care options.

METHOD

An online sample (N = 172) of adults made hypothetical surrogate decisions about end-of-life treatments on behalf of an imagined person of their choice, such as a parent or spouse. Using self-report measures, we investigated key correlates of willingness to serve as surrogate (e.g., decision-making confidence, willingness to collaborate with healthcare providers) and choice of end-of-life treatments.

RESULTS

Viewing service as a surrogate as a more typical practice in healthcare was associated with greater willingness to serve. Greater decision-making confidence, greater willingness to collaborate with patients' physicians, and viewing intensive, life-sustaining end-of-life treatments (e.g., mechanical ventilation) as more widely accepted were associated with choosing more intensive end-of-life treatments.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The current study's consideration of both intrapersonal and social-contextual factors advances knowledge of two key aspects of surrogate decision making - the initial decision to serve as surrogate, and the surrogate's selection of various end-of-life treatment interventions. Providers can use information about the role of these factors to engage with surrogates in a manner that better facilitates their decision making. For instance, providers can be sensitive to potential cultural differences in surrogate decision-making tendencies or employing decision aids that bolster surrogates' confidence in their decisions.

摘要

背景

人口老龄化增加了医疗保健环境中代理决策的普遍性。然而,人们对促成成为代理人的因素以及代理人的一般医疗决策过程知之甚少。我们调查了内在因素和社会情境因素如何预测代理人决策过程的两个组成部分:个人担任代理人的意愿以及他们选择各种临终治疗方法的倾向,包括机械通气和姑息治疗方案。

方法

一项针对成年人的在线样本(N=172)代表他们选择的想象中的人(例如父母或配偶)做出了关于临终治疗的假设性代理决策。使用自我报告的测量方法,我们调查了担任代理人意愿(例如决策信心、与医疗保健提供者合作的意愿)和临终治疗选择的关键相关性。

结果

将担任代理人视为医疗保健中更常见的做法与更大的担任代理人意愿相关。更大的决策信心、更大的与患者医生合作的意愿以及将强化、维持生命的临终治疗(例如机械通气)视为更广泛接受的治疗方法与选择更强化的临终治疗方法相关。

结果的意义

本研究对内在因素和社会情境因素的考虑,推进了对代理人决策的两个关键方面的认识-最初担任代理人的决定,以及代理人对各种临终治疗干预措施的选择。提供者可以利用这些因素的作用的信息以更好地促进他们的决策。例如,提供者可以对代理人决策倾向中的潜在文化差异保持敏感,或者采用增强代理人对自己决策信心的决策辅助工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验