Suppr超能文献

使用经过验证的问卷评估减重手术后的恶心和呕吐。

Assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting after bariatric surgery using a validated questionnaire.

机构信息

Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Department of Surgery, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Oct;16(10):1505-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is known to occur after bariatric surgery, with over two thirds of patients affected. However, variability exists in how to objectively measure PONV.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of the present study were to use a validated, patient-centered scoring tool, the Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching to measure the severity of PONV after bariatric surgery, to directly compare PONV between patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), and to identify risk factors for the development of PONV after bariatric surgery.

SETTING

Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

METHODS

The Washington University Weight Loss Surgery team prospectively surveyed patients from January 1, 2017 to December 1, 2018 at the following 6 different timepoints: postoperative day (POD) 0, POD 1, POD 2, POD 3 to 4, the first postoperative outpatient visit (POV 1: POD 5-25), and the second postoperative visit (POV 2: POD 25-50). At each timepoint, a cumulative Rhodes score was calculated from the sum of 8 questions. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was used to collect patient demographic characteristics and perioperative clinical data.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients met study criteria and completed 605 Rhodes questionnaires. Two hundred fifty Rhodes questionnaires were completed by patients after SG and 355 were completed by patients after LRYGB. Total Rhodes scores are statistically higher in LSG patients compared with patients who underwent LRYGB (LSG = 5.45 ± 6.27; LRYGB = 3.08 ± 4.19, P = .0002). Additionally, at the earlier timepoints, scores were higher among patients who underwent LSG than those who had undergone LRYGB as follows: POD 0 (LSG = 6.96 ± 6.50; LRYGB = 2.89 ± 2.90, P = .0115), POD 1 (LSG = 8.20 ± 6.76; LRYGB = 2.88 ± 3.44, P < .0001), and POD 2 (LSG = 4.05 ± 4.88; LRYGB = 2.06 ± 3.43, P = .05). On subset analysis, examining patients who either underwent an LSG or LRYGB, both procedures had a statistically significant PONV peak emerge on POV 2. Last, overall Rhodes scores were statistically higher in female patients compared with male patients (female: 4.43 ± 5.46; male: 2.35 ± 3.90, P = .021). Although the magnitude of the difference varied somewhat across POD time intervals, the difference was most pronounced at POV 2.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study using a validated nausea and vomiting questionnaire to objectively measure PONV after bariatric surgery. The factors found to be most associated with increased PONV were LSG and female sex. Ultimately, these data can help bariatric surgery programs, including Washington University Weight Loss Surgery, identify patients who may require more intensive treatment of PONV, particularly POD 0 to 2, and help to identify patients that continue to struggle with PONV in the later surgical recovery phase.

摘要

背景

减重手术后已知会发生术后恶心和呕吐(PONV),超过三分之二的患者受影响。然而,如何客观测量 PONV 存在差异。

目的

本研究的目的是使用经过验证的、以患者为中心的评分工具——罗兹恶心、呕吐和干呕指数(Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching),来衡量减重手术后 PONV 的严重程度,直接比较腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)患者之间的 PONV,并确定减重手术后 PONV 发展的风险因素。

地点

美国密苏里州圣路易斯市巴恩斯-犹太医院/华盛顿大学医学院。

方法

华盛顿大学减重手术团队于 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 1 日在以下 6 个不同时间点前瞻性调查患者:术后第 0 天(POD 0)、第 1 天(POD 1)、第 2 天(POD 2)、第 3 至 4 天(POD 3-4)、术后第 1 次门诊就诊(POD 5-25,POV 1)和第 2 次门诊就诊(POD 25-50,POV 2)。在每个时间点,根据 8 个问题的总和计算累积 Rhodes 评分。美国代谢和减重外科学会认证和质量改进计划数据库用于收集患者人口统计学特征和围手术期临床数据。

结果

共有 274 名患者符合研究标准并完成了 605 份 Rhodes 问卷。250 份 Rhodes 问卷由接受 SG 的患者完成,355 份由接受 LRYGB 的患者完成。LSG 患者的总 Rhodes 评分明显高于接受 LRYGB 的患者(LSG = 5.45 ± 6.27;LRYGB = 3.08 ± 4.19,P =.0002)。此外,在较早的时间点,LSG 患者的评分高于接受 LRYGB 的患者,具体如下:POD 0(LSG = 6.96 ± 6.50;LRYGB = 2.89 ± 2.90,P =.0115)、POD 1(LSG = 8.20 ± 6.76;LRYGB = 2.88 ± 3.44,P <.0001)和 POD 2(LSG = 4.05 ± 4.88;LRYGB = 2.06 ± 3.43,P =.05)。在亚组分析中,对接受 LSG 或 LRYGB 的患者进行检查,两种手术均在 POV 2 时出现统计学上显著的 PONV 高峰。最后,女性患者的总体 Rhodes 评分明显高于男性患者(女性:4.43 ± 5.46;男性:2.35 ± 3.90,P =.021)。尽管在 POD 时间间隔上差异的幅度有所不同,但在 POV 2 时差异最为明显。

结论

这是使用经过验证的恶心和呕吐问卷来客观测量减重手术后 PONV 的最大研究。与 PONV 增加最相关的因素是 LSG 和女性。最终,这些数据可以帮助减重手术项目,包括华盛顿大学减重手术,识别可能需要更强化治疗 PONV 的患者,尤其是 POD 0 至 2 时,并帮助识别在术后恢复后期仍持续存在 PONV 问题的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验