Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Heart. 2020 Oct;106(19):1483-1488. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316706. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
To identify: (i) risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in homeless versus housed individuals and (ii) interventions for CVD in homeless populations.
We conducted a systematic literature review in EMBASE until December 2018 using a search strategy for observational and interventional studies without restriction regarding languages or countries. Meta-analyses were conducted, where appropriate and possible. Outcome measures were all-cause and CVD mortality, and morbidity.
Our search identified 17 articles (6 case-control, 11 cohort) concerning risk of CVD and none regarding specific interventions. Nine were included to perform a meta-analysis. The majority (13/17, 76.4%) were high quality and all were based in Europe or North America, including 765 459 individuals, of whom 32 721 were homeless. 12/17 studies were pre-2011. Homeless individuals were more likely to have CVD than non-homeless individuals (pooled OR 2.96; 95% CI 2.80 to 3.13; p<0.0001; heterogeneity p<0.0001; I=99.1%) and had increased CVD mortality (age-standardised mortality ratio range: 2.6-6.4). Compared with non-homeless individuals, hypertension was more likely in homeless people (pooled OR 1.38-1.75, p=0.0070; heterogeneity p=0.935; I=0.0%).
Homeless people have an approximately three times greater risk of CVD and an increased CVD mortality. However, there are no studies of specific pathways/interventions for CVD in this population. Future research should consider design and evaluation of tailored interventions or integrating CVD into existing interventions.
确定:(i) 无家可归者与有房者患心血管疾病 (CVD) 的风险;(ii) 无家可归人群中 CVD 的干预措施。
我们在 EMBASE 中进行了系统文献检索,检索截止日期为 2018 年 12 月,使用的检索策略涵盖了观察性和干预性研究,对语言和国家没有任何限制。在适当且可能的情况下进行了荟萃分析。结局指标为全因死亡率和 CVD 死亡率以及发病率。
我们的检索共确定了 17 篇文章(6 篇病例对照研究,11 篇队列研究),涉及 CVD 风险,没有任何关于特定干预措施的文章。其中 9 篇被纳入进行荟萃分析。大多数(13/17,76.4%)研究质量较高,均基于欧洲或北美,共纳入 765459 人,其中 32721 人为无家可归者。17 项研究中有 12 项发表于 2011 年之前。与非无家可归者相比,无家可归者更有可能患有 CVD(汇总 OR 2.96;95%CI 2.80 至 3.13;p<0.0001;异质性 p<0.0001;I=99.1%),且 CVD 死亡率更高(年龄标准化死亡率比值范围:2.6-6.4)。与非无家可归者相比,无家可归者更有可能患有高血压(汇总 OR 1.38-1.75,p=0.0070;异质性 p=0.935;I=0.0%)。
无家可归者患 CVD 的风险大约增加三倍,且 CVD 死亡率更高。然而,针对该人群的 CVD 特定途径/干预措施尚无研究。未来的研究应考虑针对该人群设计和评估针对性干预措施或将 CVD 纳入现有干预措施。