Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1812-1820. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0900-8. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
We studied the penetrance of pathogenically classified variants in an elderly Dutch population from the Rotterdam Study, for which deep phenotyping is available. We screened the 59 actionable genes for which reporting of known pathogenic variants was recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), and demonstrate that determining what constitutes a known pathogenic variant can be quite challenging.
We defined "known pathogenic" as classified pathogenic by both ClinVar and the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). In 2628 individuals, we performed exome sequencing and identified known pathogenic variants. We investigated the clinical records of carriers and evaluated clinical events during 25 years of follow-up for evidence of variant pathogenicity.
Of 3815 variants detected in the 59 ACMG genes, 17 variants were considered known pathogenic. For 14/17 variants the ClinVar classification had changed over time. Of 24 confirmed carriers of these variants, we observed at least one clinical event possibly caused by the variant in only three participants (13%).
We show that the definition of "known pathogenic" is often unclear and should be approached carefully. Additionally variants marked as known pathogenic do not always have clinical impact on their carriers. Definition and classification of true (individual) expected pathogenic impact should be defined carefully.
我们研究了 Rotterdam 研究中一个具有深入表型的老年荷兰人群中病原体分类变异的外显率。我们筛选了 59 个可操作基因,这些基因的已知致病性变异被美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院(ACMG)推荐报告,并且证明确定什么是已知致病性变异可能具有相当大的挑战性。
我们将“已知致病性”定义为 ClinVar 和人类基因突变数据库(HGMD)均归类为致病性的变异。在 2628 名个体中,我们进行了外显子组测序,并鉴定了已知致病性变体。我们调查了携带者的临床记录,并在 25 年的随访中评估了临床事件,以寻找变异致病性的证据。
在 59 个 ACMG 基因中检测到的 3815 个变异中,有 17 个被认为是已知致病性的。在这 17 个变异中,ClinVar 的分类随时间发生了变化。在这 24 个变异的确诊携带者中,我们仅在 3 名参与者(13%)中观察到至少一个可能由变异引起的临床事件。
我们表明,“已知致病性”的定义通常不明确,应谨慎处理。此外,被标记为已知致病性的变异并不总是对其携带者具有临床影响。应仔细定义真正(个体)预期致病性影响的定义和分类。