• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度表型化队列研究中致病性 ACMG 变异的外显率降低,以及对 ClinVar 分类随时间变化的评估。

Reduced penetrance of pathogenic ACMG variants in a deeply phenotyped cohort study and evaluation of ClinVar classification over time.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1812-1820. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0900-8. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-020-0900-8
PMID:32665702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7605437/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We studied the penetrance of pathogenically classified variants in an elderly Dutch population from the Rotterdam Study, for which deep phenotyping is available. We screened the 59 actionable genes for which reporting of known pathogenic variants was recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), and demonstrate that determining what constitutes a known pathogenic variant can be quite challenging.

METHODS

We defined "known pathogenic" as classified pathogenic by both ClinVar and the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). In 2628 individuals, we performed exome sequencing and identified known pathogenic variants. We investigated the clinical records of carriers and evaluated clinical events during 25 years of follow-up for evidence of variant pathogenicity.

RESULTS

Of 3815 variants detected in the 59 ACMG genes, 17 variants were considered known pathogenic. For 14/17 variants the ClinVar classification had changed over time. Of 24 confirmed carriers of these variants, we observed at least one clinical event possibly caused by the variant in only three participants (13%).

CONCLUSION

We show that the definition of "known pathogenic" is often unclear and should be approached carefully. Additionally variants marked as known pathogenic do not always have clinical impact on their carriers. Definition and classification of true (individual) expected pathogenic impact should be defined carefully.

摘要

目的

我们研究了 Rotterdam 研究中一个具有深入表型的老年荷兰人群中病原体分类变异的外显率。我们筛选了 59 个可操作基因,这些基因的已知致病性变异被美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院(ACMG)推荐报告,并且证明确定什么是已知致病性变异可能具有相当大的挑战性。

方法

我们将“已知致病性”定义为 ClinVar 和人类基因突变数据库(HGMD)均归类为致病性的变异。在 2628 名个体中,我们进行了外显子组测序,并鉴定了已知致病性变体。我们调查了携带者的临床记录,并在 25 年的随访中评估了临床事件,以寻找变异致病性的证据。

结果

在 59 个 ACMG 基因中检测到的 3815 个变异中,有 17 个被认为是已知致病性的。在这 17 个变异中,ClinVar 的分类随时间发生了变化。在这 24 个变异的确诊携带者中,我们仅在 3 名参与者(13%)中观察到至少一个可能由变异引起的临床事件。

结论

我们表明,“已知致病性”的定义通常不明确,应谨慎处理。此外,被标记为已知致病性的变异并不总是对其携带者具有临床影响。应仔细定义真正(个体)预期致病性影响的定义和分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee6b/7605437/4f421ff35488/41436_2020_900_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee6b/7605437/e3d94d7d8b50/41436_2020_900_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee6b/7605437/31a77662b961/41436_2020_900_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee6b/7605437/4f421ff35488/41436_2020_900_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee6b/7605437/e3d94d7d8b50/41436_2020_900_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee6b/7605437/31a77662b961/41436_2020_900_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee6b/7605437/4f421ff35488/41436_2020_900_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduced penetrance of pathogenic ACMG variants in a deeply phenotyped cohort study and evaluation of ClinVar classification over time.深度表型化队列研究中致病性 ACMG 变异的外显率降低,以及对 ClinVar 分类随时间变化的评估。
Genet Med. 2020 Nov;22(11):1812-1820. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0900-8. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
Good performance of the criteria of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology in prediction of pathogenicity of genetic variants causing thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections.美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院/分子病理学协会标准在预测导致胸主动脉瘤和夹层的遗传变异致病性方面表现良好。
J Transl Med. 2022 Jan 25;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03251-8.
3
The Frequency of Discordant Variant Classification in the Human Gene Mutation Database: A Comparison of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines and ClinVar.人类基因突变数据库中不一致变异分类的频率:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南与 ClinVar 的比较。
Lab Med. 2021 May 4;52(3):250-259. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmaa072.
4
Expanding ACMG variant classification guidelines into a general framework.将 ACMG 变异分类指南扩展为通用框架。
Hum Genomics. 2022 Aug 16;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40246-022-00407-x.
5
Evaluation of ACMG-Guideline-Based Variant Classification of Cancer Susceptibility and Non-Cancer-Associated Genes in Families Affected by Breast Cancer.基于美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)指南对乳腺癌家族中癌症易感性基因和非癌症相关基因变异分类的评估
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 May 5;98(5):801-817. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.02.024.
6
The ACMG SF v3.0 gene list increases returnable variant detection by 22% when compared with v2.0 in the ClinSeq cohort.与 ACMG SF v2.0 相比,ClinSeq 队列中 ACMG SF v3.0 基因列表使可检出变异的比例提高了 22%。
Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):736-743. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
7
Informing variant assessment using structured evidence from prior classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 sequence variant interpretation criteria).利用先前分类(PS1、PM5 和 PVS1 序列变异解释标准)中的结构化证据进行变异评估。
Genet Med. 2023 Jan;25(1):16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
Actionable secondary findings in the 73 ACMG-recommended genes in 1559 Thai exomes.1559 个泰国外显子组中 73 个 ACMG 推荐基因的可操作的次要发现。
J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar;67(3):137-142. doi: 10.1038/s10038-021-00982-2. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
9
ClinVar and HGMD genomic variant classification accuracy has improved over time, as measured by implied disease burden.ClinVar 和 HGMD 基因组变异分类的准确性随着时间的推移有所提高,这可以通过潜在疾病负担来衡量。
Genome Med. 2023 Jul 13;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01199-y.
10
The rate of secondary genomic findings in the Saudi population.沙特人口中的二级基因组发现率。
Am J Med Genet A. 2022 Jan;188(1):83-88. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62491. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Probability and Neurodegeneration: Alzheimer's Disease and Huntington's Disease.概率与神经退行性变:阿尔茨海默病与亨廷顿病
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 29;15(8):814. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080814.
2
Using large-scale population-based data to improve disease risk assessment of clinical variants.利用基于大规模人群的数据改进临床变异的疾病风险评估。
Nat Genet. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02212-3.
3
Medically Actionable Secondary Findings from Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Data in a Sample of 3972 Individuals.对3972名个体样本的全外显子组测序(WES)数据进行的具有医学可操作性的次要发现

本文引用的文献

1
Correction: Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2.更正:BRCA1和BRCA2的变异分类随时间变化。
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2406-2407. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0526-x.
2
Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 中的变异分类随时间变化。
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2248-2254. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0493-2. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
A Rigorous Interlaboratory Examination of the Need to Confirm Next-Generation Sequencing-Detected Variants with an Orthogonal Method in Clinical Genetic Testing.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 9;26(8):3509. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083509.
4
Secondary findings in hereditary cancer genes after germline genetic testing - systematic review of literature.生殖系基因检测后遗传性癌症基因的次要发现——文献系统综述
Hum Genet. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02746-w.
5
A genotype-first approach identifies high incidence of NF1 pathogenic variants with distinct disease associations.一种先从基因型入手的方法发现,神经纤维瘤病1型(NF1)致病变异的发生率很高,且与不同的疾病相关。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 1;16(1):3121. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57077-1.
6
Expanding the mutational spectrum of ReNU syndrome: insights into 5' Stem-loop variants.扩展ReNU综合征的突变谱:对5'茎环变体的见解。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Apr;33(4):432-440. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01820-1. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
7
Meta-EA: a gene-specific combination of available computational tools for predicting missense variant effects.Meta-EA:一种用于预测错义变异效应的现有计算工具的基因特异性组合。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 2;16(1):159. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55066-4.
8
The Excess of Carriers in Rare Disorders Suggests a Nonpathogenic Effect for Most Variants of Uncertain Significance.罕见病中携带者的过量表明大多数意义不明确的变异具有非致病作用。
Clin Genet. 2025 Mar;107(3):323-327. doi: 10.1111/cge.14642. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
9
Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues.遗传筛查——新出现的问题。
Genes (Basel). 2024 May 3;15(5):581. doi: 10.3390/genes15050581.
10
Evaluating the association of biallelic OGDHL variants with significant phenotypic heterogeneity.评估双等位基因 OGDHL 变异与显著表型异质性的关联。
Genome Med. 2023 Nov 29;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01258-4.
临床基因检测中采用正交方法确认下一代测序检测到的变异体必要性的严格实验室间检验
J Mol Diagn. 2019 Mar;21(2):318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.10.009. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
4
Digenic inheritance and genetic modifiers.双基因遗传和遗传修饰物。
Clin Genet. 2018 Mar;93(3):429-438. doi: 10.1111/cge.13150. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
5
Determination of disease phenotypes and pathogenic variants from exome sequence data in the CAGI 4 gene panel challenge.在CAGI 4基因专家组挑战中,从外显子序列数据确定疾病表型和致病变异。
Hum Mutat. 2017 Sep;38(9):1201-1216. doi: 10.1002/humu.23249. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
6
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.临床测序探索性研究联盟中九个实验室对ACMG-AMP变异解读指南的执行情况。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents.具有血缘关系的成年人类中罕见基因敲除对健康和人口的影响。
Science. 2016 Apr 22;352(6284):474-7. doi: 10.1126/science.aac8624. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Systematic Evaluation of Sanger Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Variants.下一代测序变异的桑格验证的系统评价
Clin Chem. 2016 Apr;62(4):647-54. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.249623. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.序列变异解读的标准与指南:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会和分子病理学协会的联合共识推荐
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Assessment of incidental findings in 232 whole-exome sequences from the Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics.对来自贝勒-霍普金斯孟德尔基因组学中心的232个全外显子组序列中的偶然发现进行评估。
Genet Med. 2015 Oct;17(10):782-8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.196. Epub 2015 Jan 8.