Suppr超能文献

活性物质菌株QST 713(原菌株QST 713)农药风险评估的同行评审。

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain QST 713 (formerly strain QST 713).

作者信息

Anastassiadou Maria, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Brancato Alba, Bura Laszlo, Carrasco Cabrera Luis, Chaideftou Eugenia, Chiusolo Arianna, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lostia Alfonso, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Santos Miguel, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Terron Andrea, Tiramani Manuela, Vagenende Benedicte, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):e06381. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6381. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Abstract

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Germany, and co-rapporteur Member State, Denmark, for the pesticide active substance strain QST 713, formerly strain QST 713, are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of strain QST 713 as a fungicide on strawberry (field and greenhouse uses) and grapes (field use). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在对报告成员国德国和共同报告成员国丹麦的主管当局就农药活性物质菌株QST 713(原菌株QST 713)进行的初始风险评估进行同行评审之后得出的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号所要求的,并经委员会实施条例(欧盟)第2018/1659号修订。这些结论是在评估菌株QST 713作为杀菌剂在草莓(田间和温室用途)和葡萄(田间用途)上的代表性用途的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain QST 713 (formerly strain QST 713).
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):e06381. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6381. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ssp. strain GC-91.
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 5;18(11):e06293. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6293. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance subsp. strain ABTS-351.
EFSA J. 2021 Oct 22;19(10):e06879. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6879. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ssp. strain ABTS-1857.
EFSA J. 2020 Oct 30;18(10):e06294. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6294. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance subsp. strain PB 54.
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 8;19(4):e06496. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6496. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain AH2.
EFSA J. 2020 Jul 7;18(7):e06156. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6156. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance subsp. strain EG2348.
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 9;19(4):e06495. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6495. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain IT-45.
EFSA J. 2021 May 17;19(5):e06594. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6594. eCollection 2021 May.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance subsp. strain SA-12.
EFSA J. 2020 Oct 26;18(10):e06262. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6262. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance subsp. strain SA-11.
EFSA J. 2020 Oct 26;18(10):e06261. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6261. eCollection 2020 Oct.

引用本文的文献

2
Assessment of Chemical and Biological Fungicides for the Control of Causing Wood Necrosis in Hazelnut.
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;13(19):2753. doi: 10.3390/plants13192753.
3
Characterization ofantifungal properties of lipopeptide-producing strains and their proteome-based response to the phytopathogens, spp.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 7;11:1228386. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1228386. eCollection 2023.
4
Diverse environmental bacteria displaying activity against , the cause of soybean rust.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Feb 1;14:1080116. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1080116. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms.
EFSA J. 2018 Mar 28;16(3):e05206. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5206. eCollection 2018 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验