Walker C W, Brown D F
Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Dec;22(6):905-10. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.6.905.
Eighty-eight strains of Haemophilus influenzae were examined for resistance to chloramphenicol by various techniques. Methods compared were a rapid chemical assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), an agar dilution minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method, disc diffusion tests with 10, 30, and 50 micrograms discs, and a microbiological technique for detecting CAT. Fifty-eight chloramphenicol-sensitive strains had MICs less than or equal to 0.5 mg/l, while 30 resistant strains had MICs greater than or equal to 4 mg/l. The chemical CAT assay clearly distinguished resistant from sensitive strains, was simple to perform and provided results within 30 min. By disc diffusion, the lower the disc content the clearer the distinction between sensitive and resistant populations. Difficulties were encountered in interpretating the microbiological CAT assays as some sensitive strains appeared resistant. The chemical CAT assay is recommended for use when a rapid result is required. Rare chloramphenicol-resistant, CAT-negative strains have been described in the USA and these strains would only be detected by a disc diffusion or MIC test.
采用多种技术对88株流感嗜血杆菌进行了氯霉素耐药性检测。所比较的方法包括:用于检测氯霉素乙酰转移酶(CAT)的快速化学分析法、琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、使用含10微克、30微克和50微克氯霉素的纸片进行纸片扩散试验,以及一种检测CAT的微生物学技术。58株对氯霉素敏感的菌株其MIC小于或等于0.5毫克/升,而30株耐药菌株的MIC大于或等于4毫克/升。化学CAT分析法能清晰区分耐药菌株和敏感菌株,操作简单,30分钟内即可得出结果。通过纸片扩散试验,纸片含药量越低,敏感菌和耐药菌群体之间的区分越明显。在解释微生物学CAT检测结果时遇到了困难,因为一些敏感菌株显示为耐药。当需要快速得出结果时,建议使用化学CAT分析法。在美国已报道了罕见的氯霉素耐药、CAT阴性菌株,这些菌株只能通过纸片扩散试验或MIC试验检测到。