• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国到达阿片类药物治疗项目和药店的驾驶时间比较。

Comparison of Driving Times to Opioid Treatment Programs and Pharmacies in the US.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 1;77(11):1163-1171. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1624.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1624
PMID:32667648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7364344/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Methadone maintenance is an effective treatment of opioid use disorder, but federal regulations in the US restrict methadone dispensing to opioid treatment programs (OTPs). In Australia, Canada, and the UK, patients can obtain methadone maintenance from community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVE

To compare driving access to methadone maintenance treatment between OTP and pharmacy dispensing models.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This descriptive cross-sectional study assessed driving times from census tract mean centers of population to OTPs and pharmacies. Census tracts from the 50 US states and the District of Columbia (based on the 2010 US Census) were included if their population was greater than 0, if their mean center of population (MCP) was within 3 miles of the road network, and if the 1-way driving times from the census tract MCP to both an OTP and a pharmacy were 12 hours or less. Data analyses were performed from November 15, 2019, to April 18, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the population-weighted mean driving time from census tract MCPs to OTPs and pharmacies in the US. Census tract MCPs are population-weighted geographic centroids of residents living in each census tract. Driving times were estimated using historical average driving speeds.

RESULTS

All 1682 unique locations of OTPs were included, and 69 475 unique pharmacy locations were included after geocoding. A total of 72 443 census tracts were included in the analysis. The mean population-weighted driving time from census tract MCPs was 20.4 minutes (95% CI, 20.3-20.6 minutes) to OTPs and 4.5 minutes (95% CI, 4.4-4.5 minutes) to pharmacies (P < .001). Differences in driving time, distance, and cost between 1-way trips ending at OTPs and pharmacies were largest in micropolitan and noncore counties.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, population-weighted mean driving times from US census tract MCPs were longer to OTPs than to pharmacies.

摘要

重要性

美沙酮维持治疗是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的有效方法,但美国的联邦法规限制美沙酮配给只能在阿片类药物治疗计划(OTP)中进行。在澳大利亚、加拿大和英国,患者可以从社区药房获得美沙酮维持治疗。

目的

比较 OTP 和药房配药模式下获得美沙酮维持治疗的驾驶途径。

设计、设置和参与者:这项描述性的横断面研究评估了从普查区人口平均值中心到 OTP 和药房的驾驶时间。如果人口大于 0 且普查区人口平均值中心(MCP)在道路网络 3 英里内,如果从普查区 MCP 到 OTP 和药房的单向驾驶时间为 12 小时或更短,则纳入美国的 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区(基于 2010 年美国人口普查)的普查区。数据分析于 2019 年 11 月 15 日至 2020 年 4 月 18 日进行。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是美国从普查区 MCP 到 OTP 和药房的人口加权平均驾驶时间。普查区 MCP 是居住在每个普查区的居民的人口加权地理中心点。驾驶时间使用历史平均驾驶速度进行估计。

结果

共纳入了 1682 个 OTP 的独特位置,地理编码后纳入了 69475 个独特的药房位置。共有 72443 个普查区纳入分析。从普查区 MCP 到 OTP 的人口加权平均驾驶时间为 20.4 分钟(95%CI,20.3-20.6 分钟),到药房的驾驶时间为 4.5 分钟(95%CI,4.4-4.5 分钟)(P<0.001)。单程旅行终点为 OTP 和药房时,驾驶时间、距离和成本的差异在大都市和非核心县最大。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,从美国普查区 MCP 到 OTP 的人口加权平均驾驶时间比到药房的驾驶时间长。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Driving Times to Opioid Treatment Programs and Pharmacies in the US.美国到达阿片类药物治疗项目和药店的驾驶时间比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 1;77(11):1163-1171. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1624.
2
Pharmacy-based methadone dispensing and drive time to methadone treatment in five states within the United States: A cross-sectional study.美国五个州基于药房的美沙酮配药及前往美沙酮治疗机构的驾车时长:一项横断面研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Mar 27;211:107968. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107968.
3
Patient perspectives on community pharmacy administered and dispensing of methadone treatment for opioid use disorder: a qualitative study in the U.S.患者对社区药房管理和分发美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的看法:美国的一项定性研究
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 Aug 2;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00399-6.
4
Pharmacy-based methadone treatment in the US: views of pharmacists and opioid treatment program staff.美国基于药房的美沙酮治疗:药剂师和阿片类药物治疗计划工作人员的观点。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Sep 11;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00563-w.
5
Medicare Payment for Opioid Treatment Programs.医疗保险对阿片类药物治疗计划的支付。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jul 5;5(7):e241907. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1907.
6
Methadone Treatment Gap in Tennessee and How Medication Units Could Bridge the Gap: A Review.田纳西州的美沙酮治疗缺口以及药物治疗单位如何填补这一缺口:一项综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Aug 22;11(5):131. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11050131.
7
Opioid treatment program prescribing of methadone with community pharmacy dispensing: Pilot study of feasibility and acceptability.阿片类药物治疗项目中社区药房发放美沙酮的处方开具:可行性与可接受性的试点研究
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Jun;3. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100067. Epub 2022 May 16.
8
A trial of implementation facilitation to increase timely admission to methadone treatment.一项实施促进措施以增加美沙酮治疗及时入院的试验。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Jul;162:209375. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209375. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
9
Introduction of Medicare coverage in opioid treatment programs: Findings from the first three years.阿片类药物治疗项目中医疗保险覆盖范围的引入:头三年的研究结果
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Mar;158:209247. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209247. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
10
Opioid treatment program culture and philosophy: Views of OTP staff and state officials on implementing interim methadone treatment.阿片类药物治疗计划文化和理念:OTP 工作人员和州官员对实施临时美沙酮治疗的看法。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Feb;157:209265. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209265. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Care Training and Education in Addiction Medicine Fellowship: expanding the addiction medicine workforce.成瘾医学专科培训中的初级保健培训与教育:扩充成瘾医学专业人才队伍。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07494-z.
2
Barriers to accessing medications for opioid use disorder among rural individuals.农村地区个体在获取阿片类物质使用障碍药物方面的障碍。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jun;140:104805. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104805. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
3
Medicare Beneficiary Receipt of Methadone by Drive Time to Opioid Treatment Programs.按前往阿片类药物治疗项目的驾车时间划分的医疗保险受益者美沙酮接受情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3099.
4
Examining Differences Among Opioid Agonist Treatment Clients in Regional and Metropolitan Settings of New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州地区和大都市地区阿片类激动剂治疗患者之间的差异研究。
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Apr;33(2):e70029. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70029.
5
Potential improvement in spatial accessibility of methadone treatment with integration into other outpatient substance use disorder treatment programs, New York City, 2024.2024年纽约市将美沙酮治疗与其他门诊物质使用障碍治疗项目整合后,美沙酮治疗的空间可及性有望得到改善。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 5;20(2):e0317967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317967. eCollection 2025.
6
Spatial inequities in access to medications for treatment of opioid use disorder highlight scarcity of methadone providers under counterfactual scenarios.在假设情况下,治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的美沙酮供应不足,突显了获得药物治疗的空间不平等。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jul 26;20(7):e1012307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012307. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Informing evidence-based medicine for opioid use disorder using pharmacoeconomic studies.运用药物经济学研究为阿片类药物使用障碍提供循证医学信息。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Jun;24(5):599-611. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2350561. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Unintended consequences of methadone regulation for opioid use disorder treatment among hospitalized patients.美沙酮监管对住院患者阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的意外后果。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Jun;19(6):460-467. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13329. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
Methadone prescribing by addiction specialists likely to leave communities without available methadone treatment.成瘾专家开具美沙酮处方可能会导致社区无法获得美沙酮治疗。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Nov;1(5). doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad061. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
10
Simulated impact of mobile opioid treatment program units on increasing access to methadone for opioid use disorder.模拟移动阿片类药物治疗方案对增加美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的机会的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14271. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14271. Epub 2024 Jan 8.