Real World Data Science - Product Development, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
US Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(17):6216-6224. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3256. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is common in advanced melanoma patients. New treatment options have improved overall prognosis, but information is lacking for patients with CNS metastases. We investigated treatment patterns and survival outcomes in older melanoma patients with and without CNS metastases.
A retrospective analysis of SEER-Medicare, a population-based linked database, was undertaken in patients aged > 65 years with advanced melanoma diagnosed from 2004 to 2011 and followed until 2013.
A total of 2522 patients were included. CNS metastases were present in 24.8% of patients at initial metastatic diagnosis; 16.5% developed CNS metastases during follow-up. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment regardless of CNS metastases. Overall survival (OS) was better for patients without CNS metastases (median, 9.5 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8-10.2) vs patients with CNS metastases (3.63 months; 95% CI, 3.4-3.9). Among patients with CNS metastases, median OS for targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy was 6 (95% CI, 2.5-9.6), 5.5 (95% CI, 3.8-7.5), and 4.5 (95% CI, 3.8-5.4) months, respectively, vs 2.4 (95% CI, 2.1-2.7) and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-2.7) months for local radiotherapy and no treatment, respectively. Stereotactic radiosurgery demonstrated higher OS vs whole-brain radiation therapy (median, 4.98 [95% CI, 3.5-7.5] vs 2.4 [95% CI, 2.1-2.7] months).
Patients with CNS metastases from melanoma remain a population with high unmet medical need despite recent advances in treatment. Systemic treatments (eg, BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy) and stereotactic radiosurgery demonstrated meaningful but modest improvements in OS. Further explorations of combinations of radiotherapy, BRAF-targeted therapies, and immunotherapies are needed.
中枢神经系统(CNS)转移在晚期黑色素瘤患者中很常见。新的治疗选择改善了整体预后,但缺乏 CNS 转移患者的相关信息。我们研究了有和没有 CNS 转移的老年黑色素瘤患者的治疗模式和生存结果。
对 2004 年至 2011 年间诊断为晚期黑色素瘤且在 2013 年前接受随访的年龄大于 65 岁的患者进行 SEER-Medicare 回顾性分析,这是一个基于人群的关联数据库。
共纳入 2522 例患者。初始转移性诊断时 CNS 转移患者占 24.8%;16.5%的患者在随访期间发生 CNS 转移。无论是否存在 CNS 转移,化疗都是最常见的治疗方法。无 CNS 转移患者的总生存期(OS)更好(中位,9.5 个月;95%置信区间 [CI],8.8-10.2),而有 CNS 转移患者的 OS 为 3.63 个月(95% CI,3.4-3.9)。在有 CNS 转移的患者中,靶向治疗、免疫治疗和化疗的中位 OS 分别为 6(95% CI,2.5-9.6)、5.5(95% CI,3.8-7.5)和 4.5(95% CI,3.8-5.4)个月,而局部放疗和未治疗的中位 OS 分别为 2.4(95% CI,2.1-2.7)和 2.1(95% CI,1.8-2.7)个月。立体定向放射外科治疗的 OS 高于全脑放疗(中位,4.98 [95% CI,3.5-7.5] vs 2.4 [95% CI,2.1-2.7] 个月)。
尽管治疗方面取得了最近的进展,但黑色素瘤 CNS 转移患者仍然是一个有高度未满足医疗需求的人群。系统治疗(如 BRAF 靶向治疗和免疫治疗)和立体定向放射外科治疗在 OS 方面显示出有意义但适度的改善。需要进一步探索放疗、BRAF 靶向治疗和免疫治疗的联合应用。