• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于需求的、多层次的、跨部门框架,用以解释痴呆患者的护理需求满足情况的变化。

A need-based, multi-level, cross-sectoral framework to explain variations in satisfaction of care needs among people living with dementia.

机构信息

Department of Social Policy and Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2A, UK.

Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 15;20(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05416-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05416-x
PMID:32669104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7364635/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Provision of care and support for people with dementia and family carers is complex, given variation in how dementia manifests, progresses and affects people, co-morbidities associated with ageing, as well as individual preferences, needs, and circumstances. The traditional service-led approach, where individual needs are assessed against current service provision, has been recognised as unfit to meet such complexity. As a result, people with dementia and family members often fail to receive adequate support, with needs remaining unmet. Current research lacks a conceptual framework for explaining variation in satisfaction of care needs. This work develops a conceptual framework mapped onto the care delivery process to explain variations in whether, when and why care needs of people with dementia are met and to expose individual-, service-, system-level factors that enable or hinder needs satisfaction.

METHODS

Data collected through 24 in-depth interviews and two focus groups (10 participants) with people with dementia and family carers living in the North East of England (UK) were analysed thematically to develop a typology of care needs. The need most frequently reported for people with dementia (i.e. for support to go out and about) was analysed using themes stemming from the conceptual framework which combined candidacy and discrepancy theories.

RESULTS

The operationalisation of the framework showed that satisfaction of the need to go out was first determined at the point of service access, affected by issues about navigation, adjudication, permeability, users' resistance to offers, users' appearance, and systems-level operating conditions, and, subsequently, at the point of service use, when factors related to service structure and care process determined (dis)satisfaction with service and, hence, further contributed to met or unmet need.

CONCLUSION

The conceptual framework pinpoints causes of variations in satisfaction of care needs which can be addressed when designing interventions and service improvements.

摘要

背景

由于痴呆的表现、进展和影响因人而异,与衰老相关的合并症也各不相同,加上个人偏好、需求和情况的差异,为痴呆患者及其家庭照顾者提供护理和支持非常复杂。传统的以服务为导向的方法是根据当前的服务提供情况评估个人需求,这种方法已被认为无法满足这种复杂性。因此,痴呆患者和家庭成员往往无法获得足够的支持,需求得不到满足。目前的研究缺乏一个解释护理需求满足差异的概念框架。这项工作开发了一个概念框架,该框架映射到护理提供过程中,以解释痴呆患者的护理需求是否得到满足、何时得到满足以及为何得到满足的差异,并揭示能够促进或阻碍需求满足的个体、服务、系统层面的因素。

方法

通过对居住在英格兰东北部(英国)的痴呆患者及其家庭照顾者进行的 24 次深度访谈和两次焦点小组(共 10 名参与者)收集的数据进行主题分析,以制定一种护理需求分类法。对痴呆患者最常报告的需求(即外出支持)进行分析时,使用了源自该概念框架的主题,该框架结合了候选理论和差异理论。

结果

该框架的实施表明,外出需求的满足首先在服务准入点确定,受导航、裁决、渗透性、用户对服务的抗拒、用户的外貌以及系统级运营条件等问题的影响,随后在服务使用点确定,此时与服务结构和护理过程相关的因素决定了对服务的(不)满意程度,从而进一步导致需求的满足或未满足。

结论

该概念框架指出了导致护理需求满足差异的原因,在设计干预措施和服务改进时可以针对这些原因进行处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb6b/7364635/06af0c431b7a/12913_2020_5416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb6b/7364635/06af0c431b7a/12913_2020_5416_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb6b/7364635/06af0c431b7a/12913_2020_5416_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A need-based, multi-level, cross-sectoral framework to explain variations in satisfaction of care needs among people living with dementia.基于需求的、多层次的、跨部门框架,用以解释痴呆患者的护理需求满足情况的变化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 15;20(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05416-x.
2
Types and aspects of support that young carers need and value, and barriers and enablers to access: the REBIAS-YC qualitative study.年轻照顾者需要和重视的支持类型和方面,以及获得支持的障碍和促进因素:REBIAS-YC 定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(36):1-108. doi: 10.3310/ABAT6761.
3
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
4
Good practice in social care: the views of people with severe and complex needs and those who support them.社会关怀中的良好实践:有严重复杂需求的人群及其支持者的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Nov;22(6):588-97. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12105. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
5
Service-related needs of older people with dementia: perspectives of service users and their unpaid carers.老年人与痴呆症相关的服务需求:服务使用者及其无偿照顾者的观点。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jul;25(7):1107-14. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000343. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
6
Healthcare organisation and delivery for people with dementia and comorbidity: a qualitative study exploring the views of patients, carers and professionals.针对患有痴呆症和合并症患者的医疗保健组织与服务提供:一项探索患者、护理人员和专业人员观点的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 18;7(1):e013067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013067.
7
The roles of unmet needs and formal support in the caregiving satisfaction and caregiving burden of family caregivers for persons with dementia.未满足的需求和正式支持在痴呆患者家庭照顾者的照顾满意度和照顾负担中的作用。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Apr;30(4):557-567. doi: 10.1017/S104161021700196X. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
9
Needs of people with dementia and their spousal carers: A study of those living in the community.痴呆症患者及其配偶照顾者的需求:对社区居民的一项研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Jun;38(2):e43-e49. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12609. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
10
Evaluating a young-onset dementia service from two sides of the coin: staff and service user perspectives.从硬币的两面评估早发性痴呆服务:工作人员和服务使用者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5027-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Explaining the unmet information needs of family carers of people with dementia: a theoretical model of information behaviour.解释痴呆症患者家庭照料者未满足的信息需求:一种信息行为理论模型
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05626-6.
2
The Remote Assessment and Dynamic Response Program: Development of an In-Home Dementia-Related Care Needs Assessment to Improve Well-Being.远程评估与动态响应计划:开发一项居家痴呆相关护理需求评估以改善福祉。
Innov Aging. 2022 Feb 7;6(2):igac006. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac006. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The costs of dementia in England.英格兰的痴呆症成本。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;34(7):1095-1103. doi: 10.1002/gps.5113. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
2
Using the candidacy framework to understand how doctor-patient interactions influence perceived eligibility to seek help for cancer alarm symptoms: a qualitative interview study.利用候选框架理解医患互动如何影响对癌症警报症状寻求帮助的可及性感知:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):937. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3730-5.
3
Case-finding in clinical practice: An appropriate strategy for dementia identification?
临床实践中的病例发现:一种识别痴呆症的合适策略?
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Jul 10;4:288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.011. eCollection 2018.
4
A Needs-led Framework for Understanding the Impact of Caring for a Family Member With Dementia.以需求为导向的框架,用于理解照顾痴呆症家庭成员的影响。
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):e68-e77. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx148.
5
Do services meet the needs of people with dementia and carers living in the community? A scoping review of the international literature.服务是否满足社区中痴呆症患者和照顾者的需求?国际文献的范围综述。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Jan;30(1):5-14. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001491. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Medical homelessness and candidacy: women transiting between prison and community health care.医疗无家可归和资格问题:在监狱和社区医疗保健之间过渡的跨性别女性。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 20;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0627-6.
7
How people with dementia and carers understand and react to social functioning changes in mild dementia: a UK-based qualitative study.痴呆症患者及其照料者如何理解和应对轻度痴呆症中的社交功能变化:一项基于英国的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e016740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016740.
8
The gap between entitlement and access to healthcare: An analysis of "candidacy" in the help-seeking trajectories of asylum seekers in Montreal.医疗保健权益与可及性之间的差距:对蒙特利尔寻求庇护者寻求帮助轨迹中“候选资格”的分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;182:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Measuring younger onset dementia: What the qualitative literature reveals about the 'lived experience' for patients and caregivers.测量早发性痴呆:定性文献揭示的患者及照料者“生活体验”
Dementia (London). 2019 Feb;18(2):579-598. doi: 10.1177/1471301216684401. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
"Not there yet": Examining community support from the perspective of people with dementia and their partners in care.“尚未达到”:从痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴的角度审视社区支持。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jan;173:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.041. Epub 2016 Dec 1.