• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.个体学习表型驱动集体行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17949-17956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920554117. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
Early olfactory, but not gustatory processing, is affected by the selection of heritable cognitive phenotypes in honey bee.早期嗅觉,而非味觉处理,受遗传认知表型选择影响。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2021 Jan;207(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s00359-020-01451-5. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.可遗传的认知表型影响蜜蜂的食欲学习,但不影响消退。
Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2021 Jul 5;114(5):606-613. doi: 10.1093/aesa/saab023. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Tyramine and its receptor modulate attention in honey bees ().酪胺及其受体调节蜜蜂的注意力()。
Elife. 2023 Oct 10;12:e83348. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83348.
5
Coupled information networks drive honeybee (Apis mellifera) collective foraging.耦合信息网络驱动蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的集体觅食行为。
J Anim Ecol. 2024 Jan;93(1):71-82. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14029. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Individual honey bee (Apis cerana) foragers adjust their fuel load to match variability in forage reward.单个中华蜜蜂觅食者会调整其携带的能量负载,以匹配觅食回报的变化。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 9;5:16418. doi: 10.1038/srep16418.
7
Accelerated behavioural development changes fine-scale search behaviour and spatial memory in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).加速的行为发育改变了蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的精细尺度搜索行为和空间记忆。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Feb;219(Pt 3):412-8. doi: 10.1242/jeb.126920. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
Floral odor learning within the hive affects honeybees' foraging decisions.蜂巢内的花香气味学习会影响蜜蜂的觅食决策。
Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Mar;94(3):218-22. doi: 10.1007/s00114-006-0176-0. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
9
A Multiscale Review of Behavioral Variation in Collective Foraging Behavior in Honey Bees.蜜蜂集体觅食行为中行为变异的多尺度综述
Insects. 2019 Oct 25;10(11):370. doi: 10.3390/insects10110370.
10
The development of an ethanol model using social insects I: behavior studies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.).利用群居昆虫建立乙醇模型的研究 I:蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的行为研究
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Aug;24(8):1153-66.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromodulation of Swarming Behavior in : Insights into the Conserved role of Calsyntenins.群体行为的神经调节:对钙结合蛋白保守作用的见解
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 6:2025.07.06.663344. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.06.663344.
2
Cognition from genes to ecology: individual differences incognition and its potential role in a social network.从基因到生态的认知:认知的个体差异及其在社会网络中的潜在作用。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Apr 19;28(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01951-4.
3
Disruption of collective behaviour correlates with reduced interaction efficiency.集体行为的破坏与互动效率降低相关。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Mar;292(2043):20250039. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0039. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
4
Reinforcement expectation in the honeybee (): Can downshifts in reinforcement show conditioned inhibition?蜜蜂()中的强化预期:强化的递减能否表现出条件抑制?
Learn Mem. 2024 Jun 11;31(5). doi: 10.1101/lm.053915.124. Print 2024 May.
5
NAPS: Integrating pose estimation and tag-based tracking.NAPS:整合姿态估计与基于标签的跟踪
Methods Ecol Evol. 2023 Oct;14(10):2541-2548. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.14201. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
A predisposed motor bias shapes individuality in vocal learning.倾向性运动偏好塑造了声音学习中的个体差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 16;121(3):e2308837121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2308837121. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
7
Tyramine and its receptor modulate attention in honey bees ().酪胺及其受体调节蜜蜂的注意力()。
Elife. 2023 Oct 10;12:e83348. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83348.
8
Colonies of ants allocate exploratory individuals to where they are ecologically needed.蚁群会将负责探索的个体分配到生态需求的地方。
Curr Zool. 2022 Aug 23;69(5):585-591. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac065. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Diverse communication strategies in bees as a window into adaptations to an unpredictable world.蜜蜂的多样化通讯策略揭示了它们对变幻莫测世界的适应方式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 13;120(24):e2219031120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219031120. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
10
Mechanisms of collective learning: how can animal groups improve collective performance when repeating a task?集体学习的机制:当动物群体重复一项任务时,它们如何提高集体表现?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;378(1874):20220060. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0060. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Experimental psychology meets behavioral ecology: what laboratory studies of learning polymorphisms mean for learning under natural conditions, and vice versa.实验心理学与行为生态学相遇:实验室对学习多态性的研究对自然条件下学习的意义,反之亦然。
J Neurogenet. 2020 Mar;34(1):178-183. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2020.1718674. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
A Multiscale Review of Behavioral Variation in Collective Foraging Behavior in Honey Bees.蜜蜂集体觅食行为中行为变异的多尺度综述
Insects. 2019 Oct 25;10(11):370. doi: 10.3390/insects10110370.
3
Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.学习和生物胺水平的个体差异影响觅食蜂侦察蜂和新兵之间的行为分工。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Feb;88(2):236-246. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12911. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
The importance of individual variation in the dynamics of animal collective movements.动物群体运动动态中个体变异的重要性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 May 19;373(1746). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0008.
5
Task allocation and site fidelity jointly influence foraging regulation in honeybee colonies.任务分配和地点忠诚度共同影响蜂群中的觅食调节。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 30;4(8):170344. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170344. eCollection 2017 Aug.
6
Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field.认知与人格:新兴领域的分析。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Apr;30(4):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
7
Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.太空、思维与社会中的探索与利用
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex.条件反射:大脑皮层生理活动的研究
Ann Neurosci. 2010 Jul;17(3):136-41. doi: 10.5214/ans.0972-7531.1017309.
9
Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: a behavioural ecology perspective.将行为综合征与认知联系起来:行为生态学视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2762-72. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0216.
10
Molecular determinants of scouting behavior in honey bees.蜜蜂蜜蜂侦察行为的分子决定因素。
Science. 2012 Mar 9;335(6073):1225-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1213962.

个体学习表型驱动集体行为。

Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287;

Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17949-17956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920554117. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1920554117
PMID:32669435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7395545/
Abstract

Individual differences in learning can influence how animals respond to and communicate about their environment, which may nonlinearly shape how a social group accomplishes a collective task. There are few empirical examples of how differences in collective dynamics emerge from variation among individuals in cognition. Here, we use a naturally variable and heritable learning behavior called latent inhibition (LI) to show that interactions among individuals that differ in this cognitive ability drive collective foraging behavior in honey bee colonies. We artificially selected two distinct phenotypes: high-LI bees that ignore previously familiar stimuli in favor of novel ones and low-LI bees that learn familiar and novel stimuli equally well. We then provided colonies differentially composed of different ratios of these phenotypes with a choice between familiar and novel feeders. Colonies of predominantly high-LI individuals preferred to visit familiar food locations, while low-LI colonies visited novel and familiar food locations equally. Interestingly, in colonies of mixed learning phenotypes, the low-LI individuals showed a preference to visiting familiar feeders, which contrasts with their behavior when in a uniform low-LI group. We show that the shift in feeder preference of low-LI bees is driven by foragers of the high-LI phenotype dancing more intensely and attracting more followers. Our results reveal that cognitive abilities of individuals and their social interactions, which we argue relate to differences in attention, drive emergent collective outcomes.

摘要

个体学习差异会影响动物对环境的反应和交流方式,这可能会使一个社会群体完成集体任务的方式呈非线性变化。关于认知个体差异如何导致集体动态差异,目前几乎没有经验性的例子。在这里,我们使用一种称为潜伏抑制(LI)的自然可变且可遗传的学习行为,表明在这种认知能力上存在差异的个体之间的相互作用会驱动蜜蜂群体的集体觅食行为。我们人为地选择了两种截然不同的表型:高 LI 蜜蜂会忽略以前熟悉的刺激,而更喜欢新的刺激,而低 LI 蜜蜂则可以平等地学习熟悉和新的刺激。然后,我们为具有不同比例这些表型的群体提供了在熟悉和新的饲料器之间进行选择的机会。主要由高 LI 个体组成的群体更喜欢访问熟悉的食物位置,而低 LI 群体则平等地访问新的和熟悉的食物位置。有趣的是,在混合学习表型的群体中,低 LI 个体表现出对访问熟悉饲料器的偏好,这与它们在单一低 LI 群体中的行为形成对比。我们表明,低 LI 蜜蜂饲料偏好的转变是由高 LI 表型的觅食者更强烈地跳舞并吸引更多追随者驱动的。我们的结果表明,个体的认知能力及其社会互动——我们认为这与注意力差异有关——会推动集体结果的出现。