Gabouer Allison, Oghalai John, Bortfeld Heather
Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced.
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
Discourse Process. 2020;57(5-6):491-506. doi: 10.1080/0163853x.2020.1759022. Epub 2020 May 13.
In the current study, we examine how hearing parents use multimodal cuing to establish joint attention with their hearing (N=9) or deaf (N=9) children during a free-play session. The deaf children were all candidates for cochlear implantation who had not yet been implanted, and each hearing child was age-matched to a deaf child. We coded parents' use of auditory, visual, and tactile cues, alone and in different combinations, during both successful and failed bids for children's attention. Although our findings revealed no clear quantitative differences in parents' use of multimodal cues as a function of child hearing status, secondary analyses revealed that hearing parents of deaf children used shorter utterances while initiating joint attention than did hearing parents of hearing children. Hearing parents of deaf children also touched their children twice as often throughout the play session than did hearing parents of hearing children. These findings demonstrate that parents differentially accommodate the specific needs of their hearing and deaf children in subtle ways to establish communicative intent.
在本研究中,我们考察了听力正常的父母在自由玩耍环节中如何运用多模态提示与他们听力正常的孩子(N = 9)或失聪的孩子(N = 9)建立共同注意。这些失聪儿童均为尚未接受人工耳蜗植入的人工耳蜗植入候选人,且每个听力正常的孩子都与一名失聪孩子年龄匹配。我们对父母在成功和失败吸引孩子注意力的过程中单独使用以及以不同组合使用听觉、视觉和触觉提示的情况进行了编码。尽管我们的研究结果显示,父母使用多模态提示的情况并未因孩子的听力状况而呈现出明显的数量差异,但二次分析表明,与听力正常孩子的听力正常父母相比,失聪孩子的听力正常父母在发起共同注意时使用的话语更短。在整个玩耍过程中,失聪孩子的听力正常父母触碰孩子的频率也是听力正常孩子的听力正常父母的两倍。这些发现表明,父母会以微妙的方式区别对待听力正常和失聪孩子的特定需求,以确立交流意图。