• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Real-world impact of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a population-based analysis.腹腔镜直肠癌手术的真实世界影响:基于人群的分析。
Curr Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(3):e251-e258. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5829. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.微创与开放直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的结果:基于两国结直肠癌症审核数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):778-787. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001654.
3
Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.机器人辅助直肠癌低位前切除术:关于短期肿瘤学结局的全国性视角
Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1040-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001017.
4
Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.腹腔镜、开放和机器人手术治疗直肠癌的肿瘤学和围手术期结果:一项多中心、倾向评分加权队列研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jan;63(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001534.
5
Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.手术入路对直肠癌低位前切除术后短期肿瘤学结果和恢复的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Aug;21(8):932-942. doi: 10.1111/codi.14677. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.比较直肠癌切除术中机器人手术与腹腔镜手术的病理结果:7616 例患者的倾向调整分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2613-2622. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07032-1. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Cancer with Natural Orifice Versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Case-Control Study.腹腔镜前切除术治疗癌症的长期肿瘤学结果:经自然腔道取标本与传统标本取出方式的病例对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Aug;63(8):1071-1079. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001622.
8
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌(COLOR II):一项随机、3 期临床试验的短期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP.腹腔镜辅助直肠癌根治术的短期疗效:来自 ACS NSQIP 的结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 May;212(5):844-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的近期和远期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug;55(8):854-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825b9052.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between surgeon volume and the use of laparoscopic liver resection: retrospective cohort study.外科医生手术量与腹腔镜肝切除术应用之间的关联:回顾性队列研究
BJS Open. 2024 Jul 2;8(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae085.
2
The impact of robotic rectal cancer surgery at a Canadian regional cancer centre: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大地区癌症中心机器人直肠癌手术的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Can J Surg. 2024 May 1;67(3):E206-E213. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002523. Print 2024 May-Jun.
3
Laparoscopic versus open resection for stage II/III rectal cancer in obese patients: A multicenter propensity score-based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.肥胖患者II/III期直肠癌的腹腔镜与开放切除术:基于倾向评分的多中心短期和长期结局分析
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Jul 16;7(1):71-80. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12599. eCollection 2023 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗 II 期至 III 期直肠癌的无病生存和局部复发比较:ACOSOG Z6051 随机对照试验的随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002.
2
Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.直肠癌手术的短期和长期肿瘤学结果:比较开放与腹腔镜直肠癌手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Aug;22(8):1418-1433. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3738-5. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
3
Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.预测增加直肠癌腹腔镜利用的机会。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1556-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5844-y. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Isolated rectal cancer surgery: a 2007-2014 population study based on a large administrative database.孤立性直肠癌手术:一项基于大型行政数据库的2007 - 2014年人群研究。
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):367-373. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0445-9. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
5
Surgeon Annual and Cumulative Volumes Predict Early Postoperative Outcomes after Rectal Cancer Resection.外科医生的年度手术量和累计手术量可预测直肠癌切除术后的早期术后结果。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):151-157. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001672.
6
Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews.外科医生手术量与手术结果之间的关系:系统评价的系统综述
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;5(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4.
7
Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients.腹腔镜手术对老年直肠癌切除患者的益处是否能得以维持?对446例连续患者的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):632-642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5009-4. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
8
High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery.高手术量可改善治疗效果:直肠癌手术集中化的论据。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):736-48. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放手术切除直肠癌对病理结局的影响:ALA-CART 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009.
10
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助切除术与开放性切除术治疗Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期直肠癌对病理结果的影响:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z6051随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529.

腹腔镜直肠癌手术的真实世界影响:基于人群的分析。

Real-world impact of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a population-based analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(3):e251-e258. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5829. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

DOI:10.3747/co.27.5829
PMID:32669930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7339839/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes and decreased morbidity in patients with rectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic surgery (lapsx) compared with open surgery (opensx). The objective of the present study was to compare short-term outcomes after lapsx and opensx in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A national discharge abstract database was used to identify all patients who underwent rectal cancer resection in Canada (excluding Quebec) from April 2004 through March 2015. Short-term outcomes examined included same-admission mortality and length of stay (los).

RESULTS

Of 28,455 patients, 82.4% underwent opensx, and 17.6%, lapsx. The use of lapsx increased to 34% in 2014 from 5.9% in 2004 ( < 0.0001). Same-admission mortality was lower among patients undergoing lapsx than among those undergoing opensx (1.08% and 1.95% respectively, < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, the odds of same-admission mortality with lapsx was 36% lower than that with opensx (odds ratio: 0.64; = 0.003). Median los was shorter after lapsx than after opensx (5 days and 8 days respectively, = 0.0001). The strong association of lapsx with shorter los was maintained on multivariable analysis controlling for patient, surgeon, and hospital factors.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with rectal cancer, shorter los and decreased same-admission mortality are associated with the use of lapsx compared with opensx.

摘要

背景

随机试验已经证明,接受腹腔镜手术(lapx)的直肠癌患者与接受开放手术(opensx)的患者相比,其肿瘤学结果相当,发病率降低。本研究的目的是在真实环境中比较 lapx 和 opensx 的短期结果。

方法

利用国家出院摘要数据库,从 2004 年 4 月至 2015 年 3 月,确定在加拿大(魁北克除外)行直肠癌切除术的所有患者。检查的短期结果包括同院死亡率和住院时间(los)。

结果

在 28455 例患者中,82.4%行 opensx,17.6%行 lapx。lapx 的使用率从 2004 年的 5.9%增加到 2014 年的 34%(<0.0001)。lapx 组的同院死亡率低于 opensx 组(分别为 1.08%和 1.95%,<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,lapx 组的同院死亡率比 opensx 组低 36%(比值比:0.64;=0.003)。lapx 后 los 中位数短于 opensx(分别为 5 天和 8 天,=0.0001)。在多变量分析中,在控制患者、外科医生和医院因素后,lapx 与较短的 los 之间仍存在很强的关联。

结论

对于直肠癌患者,与 opensx 相比,使用 lapx 与较短的 los 和降低的同院死亡率相关。