• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The influence of social status and network structure on consensus building in collaboration networks.社会地位和网络结构对合作网络中达成共识的影响。
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2016;6(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s13278-016-0389-y. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
2
Consensus dynamics in online collaboration systems.在线协作系统中的共识动态。
Comput Soc Netw. 2018;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40649-018-0050-1. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Opinion formation in time-varying social networks: The case of the naming game.时变社交网络中的观点形成:以命名博弈为例。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Sep;86(3 Pt 2):036110. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.036110. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
4
Modelling Adaptive Learning Behaviours for Consensus Formation in Human Societies.建模人类社会共识形成中的自适应学习行为。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 10;6:27626. doi: 10.1038/srep27626.
5
Opinion evolution in different social acquaintance networks.不同社交熟人网络中的观点演变。
Chaos. 2017 Nov;27(11):113111. doi: 10.1063/1.5008391.
6
Opinion dynamics in social networks under competition: the role of influencing factors in consensus-reaching.竞争下社交网络中的观点动态:影响因素在达成共识中的作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 18;9(5):211732. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211732. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Dynamics of opinion formation under majority rules on complex social networks.复杂社交网络中多数规则下的舆论动态。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 16;10(1):456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57086-3.
8
Competing opinion diffusion on social networks.社交网络上竞争性观点的传播
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Nov 1;4(11):171160. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171160. eCollection 2017 Nov.
9
Opinion formation and distribution in a bounded-confidence model on various networks.各种网络上基于有界置信模型的观点形成和分布。
Phys Rev E. 2018 Feb;97(2-1):022312. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022312.
10
Bias in social interactions and emergence of extremism in complex social networks.社交互动中的偏见与复杂社交网络中的极端主义的出现。
Chaos. 2020 Oct;30(10):103110. doi: 10.1063/5.0009943.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus dynamics in online collaboration systems.在线协作系统中的共识动态。
Comput Soc Netw. 2018;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40649-018-0050-1. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Naming game on networks: let everyone be both speaker and hearer.网络上的命名游戏:让每个人既是发言者又是倾听者。
Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 21;4:6149. doi: 10.1038/srep06149.
2
Opinion dynamics and influencing on random geometric graphs.意见动态及其对随机几何图的影响。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 4;4:5568. doi: 10.1038/srep05568.
3
Consequence of reputation in an open-ended naming game.开放式命名游戏中声誉的后果。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Oct;78(4 Pt 2):046108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.046108. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
4
Asymmetric negotiation in structured language games.结构化语言游戏中的非对称谈判。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Feb;77(2 Pt 2):027103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.027103. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
5
The Monte Carlo method.蒙特卡罗方法。
J Am Stat Assoc. 1949 Sep;44(247):335-41. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310.
6
Nonequilibrium dynamics of language games on complex networks.复杂网络上语言博弈的非平衡动力学
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Sep;74(3 Pt 2):036105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036105. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
7
Modularity and community structure in networks.网络中的模块化与群落结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103. Epub 2006 May 24.
8
Topology-induced coarsening in language games.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Jan;73(1 Pt 2):015102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.015102. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
9
Mixing patterns in networks.网络中的混合模式。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Feb;67(2 Pt 2):026126. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126. Epub 2003 Feb 27.

社会地位和网络结构对合作网络中达成共识的影响。

The influence of social status and network structure on consensus building in collaboration networks.

作者信息

Hasani-Mavriqi Ilire, Geigl Florian, Pujari Subhash Chandra, Lex Elisabeth, Helic Denis

机构信息

Knowledge Technologies Institute, KTI, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 13/VI, Graz, 8010 Austria.

出版信息

Soc Netw Anal Min. 2016;6(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s13278-016-0389-y. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1007/s13278-016-0389-y
PMID:32670432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7346979/
Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the influence of social status on opinion dynamics and consensus building in collaboration networks. To that end, we simulate the diffusion of opinions in empirical networks and take into account both the network structure and the individual differences of people reflected through their social status. For our simulations, we adapt a well-known Naming Game model and extend it with the to account for the social status of individuals participating in a meeting. This mechanism is sufficiently flexible and allows us to model various society forms in collaboration networks, as well as the emergence or disappearance of social classes. In particular, we are interested in the way how these society forms facilitate opinion diffusion. Our experimental findings reveal that (i) opinion dynamics in collaboration networks is indeed affected by the individuals' social status and (ii) this effect is intricate and non-obvious. Our results suggest that in most of the networks the social status favors consensus building. However, relying on it too strongly can also slow down the opinion diffusion, indicating that there is a specific setting for an optimal benefit of social status on the consensus building. On the other hand, in networks where status does not correlate with degree or in networks with a positive degree assortativity consensus is always reached quickly regardless of the status.

摘要

在本文中,我们分析了社会地位对协作网络中意见动态和共识形成的影响。为此,我们在实证网络中模拟意见传播,并考虑网络结构以及通过社会地位反映出的人的个体差异。对于我们的模拟,我们采用了一个著名的命名博弈模型,并对其进行扩展以考虑参与会议的个体的社会地位。这种机制足够灵活,使我们能够对协作网络中的各种社会形式以及社会阶层的出现或消失进行建模。特别是,我们感兴趣的是这些社会形式促进意见传播的方式。我们的实验结果表明:(i)协作网络中的意见动态确实受到个体社会地位的影响;(ii)这种影响是复杂且不明显的。我们的结果表明,在大多数网络中,社会地位有利于共识的形成。然而,过于依赖社会地位也可能减缓意见传播,这表明在共识形成方面,社会地位存在一个能实现最优效益的特定设置。另一方面,在地位与度不相关的网络或具有正度相关性的网络中,无论地位如何,总是能快速达成共识。