Infectious Disease Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Sciences University and Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jul 16;14(7):e0008294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008294. eCollection 2020 Jul.
As members of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines development group on chemotherapy strategies for the control of Taenia solium taeniasis, we are very disappointed at the systematic review by Haby and colleagues. With respect to the analysis of efficacy, the authors did not account for differences in the methods used to ascertain the outcome in the studies analyzed. There are also major concerns regarding the safety analyses. Few of the included studies used carefully designed active surveillance protocols to detect epileptic seizures and/or chronic progressive headaches. These neurologic side effects, due the inadvertent killing of viable brain cysts, have been noted after mass therapy with praziquantel and albendazole. We wholeheartedly agree with the authors' statement in their discussion that control programs applying chemotherapy using mass drug administration "need to be informed by evidence of the best drug and dose in terms of efficacy and side-effects." Unfortunately, the flawed analysis that was published is contrary to that goal.
作为泛美卫生组织(PAHO)和世界卫生组织(WHO)化疗策略制定小组的成员,我们对 Haby 及其同事的系统评价感到非常失望。关于疗效分析,作者没有考虑到分析中使用的确定结果的方法的差异。安全性分析也存在重大问题。很少有纳入的研究使用精心设计的主动监测方案来检测癫痫发作和/或慢性进行性头痛。这些神经副作用是由于意外杀死活的脑囊虫所致,在使用吡喹酮和阿苯达唑进行大规模治疗后已经注意到。我们完全同意作者在讨论中的声明,即应用大规模药物治疗的化疗控制计划“需要根据疗效和副作用方面的最佳药物和剂量的证据来提供信息”。不幸的是,发表的有缺陷的分析与此目标背道而驰。