• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善健康结局项目(iHOP):在医疗补助人群中促进以提供者为驱动的研究的独特模式。

The Improved Health Outcomes Program (iHOP): A Unique Model to Promote Provider-Driven Research in a Medicaid Population.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

Passport Health, 5100 Commerce Crossings Dr, Louisville, KY 40229, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):5079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145079.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17145079
PMID:32674444
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400159/
Abstract

We describe an effort to improve the care of Medicaid and uninsured individuals through a three-way partnership between a Medicaid managed care insurer, front-line providers, and an academic university. The project provided annual funding over eleven years, for research, pilot programs, and demonstration projects. Projects were provider-driven in design and methods. The Medicaid-managed care insurer-funded proposals were vetted by a neutral university team experienced in grant writing and community-based research and scored by a community-based review panel. The grant program ran from 2007 to 2018, funding 41 projects, totaling USD 2,097,842. The partnership of an insurer, a university, and frontline providers was not only viable and sustainable for over a decade, but also flexible, free of project selection issues, and well-received by all stakeholders. Funded providers worked in both urban and rural settings and included hospitals, community non-profits, outpatient clinics, academic and community health partnerships, and public health agencies. The projects generally reflected common issues in the Medicaid and uninsured population needs, such as childhood obesity, and they were consistent with the targeted goals of the program. Broad health foci included child and/or maternal health, chronic conditions, mental health, preventive health, screening, system effectiveness, special populations including refugees, Latinos, and rural individuals, and substance use disorders. Details of the awarded grantee goals, the grants management process, and lessons learned from the partnership are presented. The partnership triad model was effective and stable, with each partner adding unique value. The use of the academic institution to administrate the program provided an arms-length relationship between the insurer and the providers in project selection and allowed assistance to less experienced researchers in community settings.

摘要

我们描述了一种通过医疗补助管理式医疗保险公司、一线服务提供者和学术型大学之间的三方合作来改善医疗补助和无保险人群护理的努力。该项目在十一年期间提供年度资金,用于研究、试点项目和示范项目。项目在设计和方法上由服务提供者驱动。由医疗保险管理式医疗保险公司资助的提案由一个在拨款撰写和基于社区的研究方面经验丰富的中立大学团队进行审查,并由一个基于社区的审查小组进行评分。该拨款计划从 2007 年持续到 2018 年,资助了 41 个项目,总计 2097842 美元。保险公司、大学和一线服务提供者的伙伴关系不仅在十多年的时间里是可行和可持续的,而且具有灵活性,没有项目选择问题,并且得到了所有利益相关者的好评。受资助的服务提供者在城市和农村地区开展工作,包括医院、社区非营利组织、门诊诊所、学术和社区卫生伙伴关系以及公共卫生机构。这些项目通常反映了医疗补助和无保险人群需求中的共同问题,例如儿童肥胖问题,并且符合该计划的目标。广泛的健康重点包括儿童和/或产妇健康、慢性病、心理健康、预防保健、筛查、系统有效性、特殊人群(包括难民、拉丁裔和农村人群)和物质使用障碍。本文介绍了授予受让人的目标、拨款管理过程以及从伙伴关系中吸取的经验教训的细节。三方合作伙伴关系模式是有效的且稳定的,每个合作伙伴都增加了独特的价值。利用学术机构来管理该计划在项目选择方面为保险公司和服务提供者之间提供了一种保持距离的关系,并为社区环境中的经验不足的研究人员提供了帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b466/7400159/07b2e019786f/ijerph-17-05079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b466/7400159/07b2e019786f/ijerph-17-05079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b466/7400159/07b2e019786f/ijerph-17-05079-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Improved Health Outcomes Program (iHOP): A Unique Model to Promote Provider-Driven Research in a Medicaid Population.改善健康结局项目(iHOP):在医疗补助人群中促进以提供者为驱动的研究的独特模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):5079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145079.
2
The influence of Community Access to Child Health (CATCH) program on community pediatrics.社区儿童健康准入(CATCH)计划对社区儿科学的影响。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):e205-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1471. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
3
Mobilizing community-driven health promotion through community granting programs: a rapid systematic review.通过社区拨款项目调动社区驱动的健康促进:快速系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18443-8.
4
Outcomes measurement and management with a large Medicaid population: a public/private collaboration.针对大量医疗补助计划人群的结果测量与管理:公私合作
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1995 May-Jun;4(3):31-7.
5
Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: the Washington State Occupational Health Services Project.提高工伤赔偿医疗服务质量:华盛顿州职业健康服务项目。
Milbank Q. 2001;79(1):5-33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00194.
6
The Community-Academic Aging Research Network: A Pipeline for Dissemination.社区-学术老龄化研究网络:传播的渠道。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1325-1333. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16363. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Experiences of three states implementing the Medicaid health home model to address opioid use disorder-Case studies in Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont.三个州实施医疗补助健康之家模式以解决阿片类药物使用障碍的经验——马里兰州、罗得岛州和佛蒙特州的案例研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Dec;83:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
Medicaid managed behavioral health in rural areas.农村地区的医疗补助管理式行为健康服务
J Rural Health. 2003 Winter;19(1):22-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb00538.x.
9
The national improvement partnership network: state-based partnerships that improve primary care quality.国家改善合作网络:基于州的合作关系提升初级医疗保健质量。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.001.
10
Maximizing resources with mini-grants: enhancing preparedness capabilities and capacity in public health organizations.利用小额赠款实现资源最大化:增强公共卫生组织的防范能力和容量
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;20 Suppl 5:S83-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000094.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving health equity through health care systems research.通过医疗体系研究提高卫生公平性。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):289-299. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14192.

本文引用的文献

1
An Empirical Study of Chronic Diseases in the United States: A Visual Analytics Approach.美国慢性病的实证研究:一种可视化分析方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 1;15(3):431. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030431.
2
Social Determinants of Health in the United States: Addressing Major Health Inequality Trends for the Nation, 1935-2016.美国健康的社会决定因素:应对1935 - 2016年美国主要的健康不平等趋势
Int J MCH AIDS. 2017;6(2):139-164. doi: 10.21106/ijma.236.
3
Community Engaged Leadership to Advance Health Equity and Build Healthier Communities.
社区参与式领导力促进健康公平并建设更健康的社区。
Soc Sci (Basel). 2016 Mar;5(1). doi: 10.3390/socsci5010002. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
4
The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes.健康的社会决定因素:是时候考虑原因的原因了。
Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):19-31. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S206.