National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada.
Department of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, 16 Fitzroy St, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N8, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18443-8.
Effective health promotion responds to the unique needs of communities. Community granting programs that fund community-driven health promotion initiatives are a potential mechanism to meet those unique needs. While numerous community health-focused programs are available, the various strategies used by granting programs to foster engagement, administer grants and support awardees have not been systematically evaluated. This rapid systematic review explores the administration of community granting programs and how various program components impact process and population health outcomes.
A systematic search was conducted across three databases: Medline, SocINDEX, and Political Science Database. Single reviewers completed screening, consistent with a rapid review protocol. Studies describing or evaluating community granting programs for health or public health initiatives were included. Data regarding program characteristics were extracted and studies were evaluated for quality. A convergent integrated approach was used to analyze quantitative and qualitative findings.
Thirty-five community granting programs, described in 36 studies, were included. Most were descriptive reports or qualitative studies conducted in the USA. Program support for grant awardees included technical assistance, workshops and training, program websites, and networking facilitation. While most programs reported on process outcomes, few reported on community or health outcomes; such outcomes were positive when reported. Programs reported that many funded projects were likely sustainable beyond program funding, due to the development of awardee skills, new partnerships, and securing additional funding. From the perspectives of program staff and awardees, facilitators included the technical assistance and workshops provided by the programs, networking amongst awardees, and the involvement of community members. Barriers included short timelines to develop proposals and allocate funds.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of health-related community granting programs. Grant awardees benefit from technical assistance, workshops, and networking with other awardees. Project sustainability is enhanced by the development of new community partnerships and grant-writing training for awardees. Community granting programs can be a valuable strategy to drive community health, with several key elements that enhance community mobilization.
PROSPERO #CRD42023399364.
有效的健康促进活动需要针对社区的独特需求。资助社区主导的健康促进计划的社区拨款项目是满足这些独特需求的潜在机制。虽然有许多以社区为重点的健康计划,但拨款项目用于促进参与、管理拨款和支持获奖者的各种策略尚未得到系统评估。本快速系统评价探讨了社区拨款项目的管理,以及各种项目组成部分如何影响过程和人群健康结果。
在三个数据库中进行了系统搜索:Medline、SocINDEX 和政治科学数据库。单 reviewers 按照快速审查方案完成了筛选。纳入描述或评估针对健康或公共卫生计划的社区拨款项目的研究。提取了有关计划特征的数据,并对研究进行了质量评估。使用收敛综合方法分析定量和定性结果。
纳入了 35 个社区拨款项目,描述在 36 项研究中。大多数是在美国进行的描述性报告或定性研究。对赠款获得者的项目支持包括技术援助、讲习班和培训、项目网站和网络促进。虽然大多数项目报告了过程结果,但很少报告社区或健康结果;当报告时,结果是积极的。项目报告说,由于获奖者技能的发展、新的合作伙伴关系以及额外资金的获得,许多资助项目很可能在项目资金之外持续下去。从项目工作人员和获奖者的角度来看,促进因素包括项目提供的技术援助和讲习班、获奖者之间的网络联系以及社区成员的参与。障碍包括制定提案和分配资金的时间短。
本综述提供了健康相关社区拨款计划的全面概述。赠款获得者受益于技术援助、讲习班和与其他获奖者的网络联系。新社区伙伴关系的发展以及对获奖者的赠款写作培训增强了项目的可持续性。社区拨款项目可以成为推动社区健康的有价值策略,有几个增强社区动员的关键要素。
PROSPERO #CRD42023399364。