Suppr超能文献

是什么导致了美国的药物过量流行?

What Is Driving the Drug Overdose Epidemic in the United States?

机构信息

Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.

University of North Texas, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Health Soc Behav. 2020 Sep;61(3):275-289. doi: 10.1177/0022146520939514. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Abstract

The demand-side perspective argues that the drug overdose epidemic is a consequence of changes in the economy that leave behind working-class people who lack a college education. In contrast, the supply-side perspective maintains that the epidemic is primarily due to changes in the licit and illicit drug environment, whereas a third, distinct perspective argues that income inequality is likely a key driver of the epidemic. To evaluate these competing perspectives, we use a two-level random intercept model and U.S. state-level data from 2006 to 2017. Contrary to the demand-side approach, we find that educational attainment is not associated with drug-related mortality. In support of the supply-side approach, we provide evidence indicating that opioid prescription rates are positively associated with drug-related mortality. We also find that income inequality is a key driver of the epidemic, particularly the lack of resources going to the bottom 20% of earners. We conclude by arguing that considerations of income inequality are an important way to link the arguments made by the demand-side and the supply-side perspectives.

摘要

从需求方的角度来看,药物过量流行是经济变化的结果,这些变化使没有大学学历的工人阶级落后。相比之下,供应方的观点认为,这种流行病主要是由于合法和非法毒品环境的变化造成的,而第三种截然不同的观点则认为,收入不平等很可能是这种流行病的一个关键驱动因素。为了评估这些相互竞争的观点,我们使用了两级随机截距模型和 2006 年至 2017 年美国各州的数据。与需求方的方法相反,我们发现教育程度与与药物相关的死亡率无关。支持供应方的方法,我们提供的证据表明,阿片类药物处方率与与药物相关的死亡率呈正相关。我们还发现,收入不平等是这种流行病的一个关键驱动因素,特别是缺乏资源流向收入最低的 20%的人群。最后我们认为,考虑收入不平等是将需求方和供应方观点联系起来的一个重要途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验