• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RAPID临床风险预测评分在成年胸膜感染患者中的前瞻性验证:PILOT研究

Prospective validation of the RAPID clinical risk prediction score in adult patients with pleural infection: the PILOT study.

作者信息

Corcoran John P, Psallidas Ioannis, Gerry Stephen, Piccolo Francesco, Koegelenberg Coenraad F, Saba Tarek, Daneshvar Cyrus, Fairbairn Ian, Heinink Richard, West Alex, Stanton Andrew E, Holme Jayne, Kastelik Jack A, Steer Henry, Downer Nicola J, Haris Mohammed, Baker Emma H, Everett Caroline F, Pepperell Justin, Bewick Thomas, Yarmus Lonny, Maldonado Fabien, Khan Burhan, Hart-Thomas Alan, Hands Georgina, Warwick Geoffrey, De Fonseka Duneesha, Hassan Maged, Munavvar Mohammed, Guhan Anur, Shahidi Mitra, Pogson Zara, Dowson Lee, Popowicz Natalia D, Saba Judith, Ward Neil R, Hallifax Rob J, Dobson Melissa, Shaw Rachel, Hedley Emma L, Sabia Assunta, Robinson Barbara, Collins Gary S, Davies Helen E, Yu Ly-Mee, Miller Robert F, Maskell Nick A, Rahman Najib M

机构信息

Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2020 Nov 26;56(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00130-2020. Print 2020 Nov.

DOI:10.1183/13993003.00130-2020
PMID:32675200
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over 30% of adult patients with pleural infection either die and/or require surgery. There is no robust means of predicting at baseline presentation which patients will suffer a poor clinical outcome. A validated risk prediction score would allow early identification of high-risk patients, potentially directing more aggressive treatment thereafter.

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively assess a previously described risk score (the RAPID (Renal (urea), Age, fluid Purulence, Infection source, Dietary (albumin)) score) in adults with pleural infection.

METHODS

Prospective observational cohort study that recruited patients undergoing treatment for pleural infection. RAPID score and risk category were calculated at baseline presentation. The primary outcome was mortality at 3 months; secondary outcomes were mortality at 12 months, length of hospital stay, need for thoracic surgery, failure of medical treatment and lung function at 3 months.

RESULTS

Mortality data were available in 542 out of 546 patients recruited (99.3%). Overall mortality was 10% at 3 months (54 out of 542) and 19% at 12 months (102 out of 542). The RAPID risk category predicted mortality at 3 months. Low-risk mortality (RAPID score 0-2): five out of 222 (2.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 5.7%); medium-risk mortality (RAPID score 3-4): 21 out of 228 (9.2%, 95% CI 6.0 to 13.7%); and high-risk mortality (RAPID score 5-7): 27 out of 92 (29.3%, 95% CI 21.0 to 39.2%). C-statistics for the scores at 3 months and 12 months were 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.83) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.82), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The RAPID score stratifies adults with pleural infection according to increasing risk of mortality and should inform future research directed at improving outcomes in this patient population.

摘要

背景

超过30%的成年胸膜感染患者死亡和/或需要手术治疗。在基线评估时,尚无可靠方法预测哪些患者临床结局不佳。经过验证的风险预测评分可早期识别高危患者,从而可能在此后指导更积极的治疗。

目的

前瞻性评估先前描述的胸膜感染成年患者风险评分(RAPID(肾脏(尿素)、年龄、积液脓性、感染源、饮食(白蛋白))评分)。

方法

前瞻性观察队列研究,纳入接受胸膜感染治疗的患者。在基线评估时计算RAPID评分和风险类别。主要结局为3个月时的死亡率;次要结局为12个月时的死亡率、住院时间、胸外科手术需求、内科治疗失败情况以及3个月时的肺功能。

结果

纳入的546例患者中有542例(99.3%)可获得死亡率数据。3个月时总体死亡率为10%(542例中的54例),12个月时为19%(542例中的102例)。RAPID风险类别可预测3个月时的死亡率。低风险死亡率(RAPID评分为0 - 2):222例中的5例(2.3%,95%可信区间0.9至5.7%);中等风险死亡率(RAPID评分为3 - 4):228例中的21例(9.2%,95%可信区间6.0至13.7%);高风险死亡率(RAPID评分为5 - 7):92例中的27例(29.3%,95%可信区间21.0至39.2%)。3个月和12个月时评分的C统计量分别为0.78(95%可信区间0.71 - 0.83)和0.77(95%可信区间0.72 - 0.82)。

结论

RAPID评分根据成年胸膜感染患者死亡风险的增加进行分层,应为今后旨在改善该患者群体结局的研究提供参考。

相似文献

1
Prospective validation of the RAPID clinical risk prediction score in adult patients with pleural infection: the PILOT study.RAPID临床风险预测评分在成年胸膜感染患者中的前瞻性验证:PILOT研究
Eur Respir J. 2020 Nov 26;56(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00130-2020. Print 2020 Nov.
2
Validation of the RAPID score in a Danish population with pleural infection.丹麦胸膜感染人群中RAPID评分的验证
Dan Med J. 2024 Jul 4;71(8):A01240071. doi: 10.61409/A01240071.
3
A clinical score (RAPID) to identify those at risk for poor outcome at presentation in patients with pleural infection.一种临床评分(RAPID),用于识别那些在患有胸膜感染的患者就诊时存在不良预后风险的患者。
Chest. 2014 Apr;145(4):848-855. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1558.
4
Role of RAPID score and surgery in the management of pleural infection: a single center retrospective study.RAPID评分和手术在胸腔感染管理中的作用:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):5340-5348. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1599. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Prognostic significance of pleural fluid microbiological positivity in pleural infection: a bicentric 10-year retrospective observational study.胸腔感染中胸腔积液微生物学阳性的预后意义:一项双中心10年回顾性观察研究
Respir Res. 2025 Feb 13;26(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03129-5.
6
Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator and deoxyribonuclease in complex pleural effusion and empyema, clinical outcomes, and predictors.胸膜内组织型纤溶酶原激活剂和脱氧核糖核酸酶治疗复杂性胸腔积液和脓胸的临床结局及预测因素
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251343711. doi: 10.1177/17534666251343711. Epub 2025 May 30.
7
The role of the RAPID score in surgical planning for empyema.RAPID评分在脓胸手术规划中的作用。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Mar 31;15(3):985-993. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-747. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
8
Evaluation of the RAPID score as a predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pulmonary decortication for stage III pleural empyema.评估RAPID评分对Ⅲ期胸膜腔脓胸行肺纤维板剥脱术患者术后发病率和死亡率的预测价值。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Apr 11;79:100356. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100356. eCollection 2024.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Risk Stratification in Patients with Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema Using the RAPID Score.应用 RAPID 评分对复杂性类肺炎旁胸腔积液和脓胸患者进行风险分层。
Lung. 2018 Oct;196(5):623-629. doi: 10.1007/s00408-018-0146-2. Epub 2018 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Practical Approach to Pleural Infection.胸膜感染的实用治疗方法。
Pulm Ther. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s41030-025-00308-z.
2
Antibiotic resistance in empyema thoracis: clinical outcomes and contributing factors in a tertiary care setting in Pakistan.脓胸的抗生素耐药性:巴基斯坦一家三级医疗机构的临床结果及相关因素
IJID Reg. 2025 Apr 30;15:100658. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100658. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator and deoxyribonuclease in complex pleural effusion and empyema, clinical outcomes, and predictors.
胸膜内组织型纤溶酶原激活剂和脱氧核糖核酸酶治疗复杂性胸腔积液和脓胸的临床结局及预测因素
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251343711. doi: 10.1177/17534666251343711. Epub 2025 May 30.
4
Pleural fluid proteomics from patients with pleural infection shows signatures of diverse neutrophilic responses: The Oxford Pleural Infection Endotyping Study (TORPIDS-2).胸膜感染患者的胸腔积液蛋白质组学显示出不同中性粒细胞反应的特征:牛津胸膜感染内型研究(TORPIDS - 2)。
Eur Respir J. 2025 Jul 14;66(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00010-2025. Print 2025 Jul.
5
Pleural Infection: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions.胸膜感染:诊断、管理及未来方向
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 2;14(5):1685. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051685.
6
Utility of RAPID score in parapneumonic effusion or empyema: A prospective study at a tertiary centre.RAPID评分在类肺炎性胸腔积液或脓胸中的应用:一项在三级中心进行的前瞻性研究。
Lung India. 2025 Mar 1;42(2):97-102. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_222_24. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
7
Prognostic significance of pleural fluid microbiological positivity in pleural infection: a bicentric 10-year retrospective observational study.胸腔感染中胸腔积液微生物学阳性的预后意义:一项双中心10年回顾性观察研究
Respir Res. 2025 Feb 13;26(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03129-5.
8
Evaluating the feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of next-generation molecular methods for pleural infection diagnosis.评估用于胸膜感染诊断的新一代分子方法的可行性、敏感性和特异性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Feb 4;13(2):e0196024. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01960-24. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
9
Reply to Ravaglia : MIST-3 Is Well Worth an Echo!对拉瓦利亚的回复:MIST-3很值得进行超声心动图检查!
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;210(5):695-696. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202404-0755LE.
10
MIST-3 Is Well Worth an Echo!MIST-3很值得进行超声心动图检查!
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 1;210(5):694-695. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0412LE.