Suppr超能文献

脑损伤伴抑郁症状个体的应对策略和人格特征。

Coping strategies and personality traits among individuals with brain injury and depressive symptoms.

机构信息

Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;47(1):25-34. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203081.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this observational cohort study was to compare coping strategies and personality traits among individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI), based on their level of depression symptoms.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from an ABI outpatient clinic in Ontario, Canada. Participants were selected using the following inclusion criteria: 1) diagnosed with an ABI, 2) 18 years of age, and 3) able to read and write in English. Individuals completed the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, Adult Dispositional Hope Scale, Big Five Inventory, Brief Coping Orientation of Problems Experienced, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. A descriptive analysis was performed for the overall sample, as well as for each subclassification of depression: none (PHQ-9 = 0-4), mild (PHQ-9 = 5-9), moderate (PHQ-9 = 10-14), and severe (PHQ-9 = 15-27). A one-way multivariate analysis of variance, with post hoc Bonferroni-corrected tests, was conducted to assess the impact of depression symptoms on coping strategies and personality traits.

RESULTS

A total of 89 individuals (56.2% females) were included with a mean age of 46.6±15.1 years and a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13.2±3.4. Overall, individuals were 3.5±4.3 years post injury. There was a statistically significant interaction effect between depression groups and the combined coping strategy and personality trait variables (F(36,128)=2.959, p < .001; Wilks' Λ= .167). Individuals with mild (p = .045), moderate (p = .004) and severe (p < .001) depression symptoms had greater experiential avoidance (EA) than those without depression. Those with severe depression symptoms had significantly greater anxiety sensitivity than those with no (p < 0.001), mild, (p = .004) or moderate (p = .025) depression symptoms. Overall, individuals in the no, mild, and moderate depression groups used emotion-focused strategies primarily, followed by dysfunctional strategies for coping. Conversely, those with severe depression symptoms primarily used dysfunctional strategies, followed by emotion-focused strategies to cope. All depression groups applied problem-based coping strategies infrequently.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of passive coping strategies combined with increased EA behaviours among severely depressed individuals with ABI may lead to long-term negative outcomes. Programs that promote problem-based coping and reduce EA behaviours may be beneficial in reducing disability and impaired quality of life associated with depression symptoms in individuals with ABI.

摘要

目的

本观察性队列研究旨在根据个体抑郁症状的严重程度,比较获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者的应对策略和人格特质。

方法

参与者从加拿大安大略省的 ABI 门诊诊所招募。使用以下纳入标准选择参与者:1)诊断为 ABI,2)年龄在 18 岁及以上,3)能够用英语读写。个体完成了患者健康问卷 9 项(PHQ-9)、接受和行动问卷、焦虑敏感性指数、成人特质希望量表、大五人格量表、经历问题的简要应对取向、罗森伯格自尊量表。对总体样本以及抑郁的每个亚分类(无抑郁:PHQ-9=0-4;轻度抑郁:PHQ-9=5-9;中度抑郁:PHQ-9=10-14;重度抑郁:PHQ-9=15-27)进行描述性分析。采用单因素多元方差分析,结合事后 Bonferroni 校正检验,评估抑郁症状对应对策略和人格特质的影响。

结果

共有 89 名个体(56.2%为女性)入组,平均年龄为 46.6±15.1 岁,平均格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 13.2±3.4。总体而言,个体在受伤后 3.5±4.3 年。抑郁组与综合应对策略和人格特质变量之间存在统计学上显著的交互效应(F(36,128)=2.959,p<.001;Wilks' Λ=0.167)。有轻度(p=0.045)、中度(p=0.004)和重度(p<.001)抑郁症状的个体比无抑郁的个体有更大的体验回避(EA)。有重度抑郁症状的个体的焦虑敏感性明显高于无抑郁(p<.001)、轻度(p=0.004)或中度(p=0.025)抑郁症状的个体。总体而言,无、轻度和中度抑郁组的个体主要使用情绪聚焦策略,其次是功能失调的应对策略。相反,有重度抑郁症状的个体主要使用功能失调的应对策略,其次是情绪聚焦策略来应对。所有抑郁组都很少使用基于问题的应对策略。

结论

ABI 重度抑郁个体使用被动应对策略并伴有 EA 行为增加,可能导致长期不良后果。促进基于问题的应对和减少 EA 行为的方案可能有助于减少与抑郁症状相关的残疾和生活质量受损。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验