Suppr超能文献

焦虑、抑郁与脑损伤后亚组人群的生活质量:焦虑敏感性和体验回避的作用。

Anxiety, depression, and quality of life among subgroups of individuals with acquired brain injury: The role of anxiety sensitivity and experiential avoidance.

机构信息

Parkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;47(1):45-53. doi: 10.3233/NRE-203080.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this observational cohort study were to 1) cluster individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) into subgroups according to their level of anxiety sensitivity (AS) and experiential avoidance (EA), and 2) compare subgroups with respect to anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Individuals were recruited from an ABI outpatient clinic in Ontario, Canada and completed comprehensive psychosocial questionnaires. A two-step cluster analysis was performed to identify unique subgroups based on the clustering variables Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) which measure AS and EA, respectively. Clinical outcome measures were compared between clusters using multivariate analysis of variance: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 item (anxiety); Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression), and EQ-5D overall health item (QoL).

RESULTS

Among 86 participants included for analysis (mean age 47.1±14.2 years, 54.7% female), three unique clusters were produced. ASI and AAQ were significantly different among all groups (p < 0.001). Cluster 1 (n = 26) had the lowest levels of AS and EA whereas Cluster 3 (n = 24) had the highest levels of AS and EA; Cluster 2 (n = 36) had moderate levels of AS and EA. There was no significant difference between groups in age, gender, time since injury, or Glasgow Coma Scale scores. Cluster 3 had significantly higher anxiety and depression scores than Cluster 1 and 2 (p < 0.001 for all). Further, Cluster 2 had significantly higher anxiety and depression scores than Cluster 1 (p < 0.001 for all). There was no significant difference in EQ-5D scores between Clusters 1 and 2 or Cluster 2 and 3; however, Cluster 3 scored significantly lower on EQ-5D than Cluster 1 (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

There exists a subgroup of individuals with ABI that have high levels of AS and EA; this was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety and depression, and poorer QoL. Interventions to address AS and EA may improve mood and QoL in this population.

摘要

目的

本观察性队列研究的目的是 1)根据焦虑敏感(AS)和经验回避(EA)水平,将获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者聚类为亚组,2)比较亚组的焦虑、抑郁和生活质量(QoL)。

方法

从加拿大安大略省的 ABI 门诊诊所招募患者,并完成全面的社会心理问卷。采用两步聚类分析,根据焦虑敏感指数(ASI)和接受与行动问卷(AAQ)两个聚类变量,分别测量 AS 和 EA,确定独特的亚组。使用多变量方差分析比较簇之间的临床结果测量:广泛性焦虑障碍 7 项(焦虑);患者健康问卷-9(抑郁)和 EQ-5D 总体健康项(QoL)。

结果

在纳入分析的 86 名参与者中(平均年龄 47.1±14.2 岁,54.7%为女性),产生了三个独特的亚组。所有组之间的 ASI 和 AAQ 差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。簇 1(n=26)的 AS 和 EA 水平最低,而簇 3(n=24)的 AS 和 EA 水平最高;簇 2(n=36)的 AS 和 EA 水平中等。组间在年龄、性别、损伤后时间或格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分方面无显著差异。簇 3 的焦虑和抑郁评分显著高于簇 1 和 2(所有 p<0.001)。此外,簇 2 的焦虑和抑郁评分显著高于簇 1(所有 p<0.001)。簇 1 和 2 或簇 2 和 3 之间的 EQ-5D 评分无显著差异;然而,簇 3 的 EQ-5D 评分显著低于簇 1(p=0.032)。

结论

ABI 患者存在一组具有高 AS 和 EA 水平的亚组;这与更大的焦虑和抑郁症状以及较差的 QoL 相关。针对 AS 和 EA 的干预措施可能会改善这一人群的情绪和 QoL。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验