Suppr超能文献

通过高质量的结肠清洁改善结直肠腺瘤的检测。

Improved detection of colorectal adenomas by high-quality colon cleansing.

作者信息

Hassan Cesare, Manning Jonathan, Álvarez González Marco Antonio, Sharma Prateek, Epstein Michael, Bisschops Raf

机构信息

Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Rome, Italy.

Borders General Hospital, NHS Borders, Melrose, Berwickshire, UK.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2020 Jul;8(7):E928-E937. doi: 10.1055/a-1167-1359. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Abstract

Reliable adenoma detection requires "adequate" bowel preparation. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was assessed in patients with high-quality (stool-free) cleansing versus adequate cleansing. This study was a post-hoc combined analysis of three randomized trials individually powered for cleansing quality assessment. Treatment-independent ADR was assessed versus colon cleansing quality by central readers using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS) and the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). The number needed to treat (NNT) to find an additional patient with at least one adenoma was calculated for high-quality versus adequate-quality cleansing. A total of 1749 patients were included. ADR increased with high-quality versus adequate-quality cleansing: HCS grade A versus B, 39 % (94/242) versus 27 % (336/1229); NNT = 8.7;  < 0.001. ADR also increased with high-quality versus uniform adequate segmental cleansing scores: HCS grade A versus uniform segmental scores 2, 39 % (94/242) versus 26 % (97/379); NNT = 7.5;  < 0.001. ADR increased with top-quality versus adequate segmental cleansing scores: HCS uniform segmental scores 4 versus 2, 54 % (21/39) versus 26 % (97/379); NNT = 3.6;  < 0.001. ADR increased with BBPS 9 versus 6, 43 % (71/166) versus 26 % (247/950); NNT = 6.0;  < 0.001. Right colon ADR increased with top-quality versus adequate cleansing: HCS 4 versus 2, 20 % (25/122) versus 11 % (121/1117); NNT = 10.4;  < 0.001 and BBPS 3 versus 2, 15 % (42/284) versus 11 % (130/1192); NNT = 25.8;  = 0.033. High-quality colon cleansing improves adenoma detection, and it should be a priority for bowel preparations for colonoscopy.

摘要

可靠的腺瘤检测需要“充分”的肠道准备。在高质量(无粪便)清洁与充分清洁的患者中评估腺瘤检测率(ADR)。本研究是对三项分别为评估清洁质量而设计的随机试验进行的事后综合分析。由中心阅片者使用哈雷菲尔德清洁量表(HCS)和波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS),评估与结肠清洁质量无关的ADR。计算高质量清洁与充分质量清洁时发现另外一名至少有一个腺瘤患者所需的治疗人数(NNT)。共纳入1749例患者。高质量清洁与充分质量清洁相比,ADR升高:HCS A级与B级,分别为39%(94/242)与27%(336/1229);NNT = 8.7;P < 0.001。高质量清洁与均匀的充分节段清洁评分相比,ADR也升高:HCS A级与均匀节段评分2分,分别为39%(94/242)与26%(97/379);NNT = 7.5;P < 0.001。高质量清洁与充分节段清洁评分相比,ADR升高:HCS均匀节段评分4分与2分,分别为54%(21/39)与26%(97/379);NNT = 3.6;P < 0.001。BBPS 9分与6分相比,ADR升高,分别为43%(71/166)与26%(247/950);NNT = 6.0;P < 0.001。右半结肠ADR在高质量清洁与充分清洁相比时升高:HCS 4分与2分,分别为20%(25/122)与11%(121/1117);NNT = 10.4;P < 0.001,以及BBPS 三分与2分,分别为15%(42/284)与11%(130/1192);NNT = 25.8;P = 0.033。高质量的结肠清洁可提高腺瘤检测率,应作为结肠镜检查肠道准备的优先事项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f565/7359847/71dd4ca6415a/10-1055-a-1167-1359-i1793ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验