University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
University of Verona, Italy.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):74-94. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12404. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
Research has shown that vicarious contact, that is observing an interaction between ingroup and outgroup members, can improve intergroup relations. Although vicarious contact has been operationalized in different ways, mainly via story reading or video watching, an experimental comparison of these different strategies is still missing. We conducted a school intervention with the aim of comparing the two most used forms of vicarious contact, namely story reading and video watching. Elementary schoolchildren without disabilities (N = 292) were assigned to one of three different conditions: reading a story; watching a video; control. In the two vicarious contact conditions, participants read or watched the story of a child with disability becoming friends with children without disabilities; in the control condition, participants only completed the dependent measures. Results revealed that, in general, both vicarious contact conditions were equally effective in improving outgroup attitudes and behavioural intentions. In addition, they operated with the same strength through the same underlying processes (IOS, ingroup norms). We discuss theoretical and practical implications in the context of vicarious contact as a prejudice-reduction intervention.
研究表明,替代性接触,即观察群体内和群体外成员之间的互动,可以改善群体间关系。虽然替代性接触已经以不同的方式进行了操作,主要是通过故事阅读或视频观看,但这些不同策略的实验比较仍然缺失。我们进行了一项学校干预,旨在比较替代性接触的两种最常用形式,即故事阅读和视频观看。没有残疾的小学生(N=292)被分配到以下三种不同条件之一:阅读故事;观看视频;控制。在两种替代性接触条件下,参与者阅读或观看了一个残疾儿童与没有残疾的儿童成为朋友的故事;在控制条件下,参与者仅完成了依赖措施。结果表明,一般来说,两种替代性接触条件在改善对外群体的态度和行为意图方面同样有效。此外,它们通过相同的底层过程(IOS,内群体规范)以相同的强度运作。我们在替代性接触作为一种减少偏见的干预措施的背景下讨论了理论和实践意义。