Kirkland Scott W, Soleimani Amir, Newton Amanda S
Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018 Feb;23(1):4-13. doi: 10.1111/camh.12230. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Increases in emergency department (ED) visits for pediatric mental health care point to a need to understand the impact of mental health services in relation to emergency-based care. This systematic review examined the impact of mental health services delivered in outpatient, primary care, community and/or school settings on ED use and costs for ED-based mental health care.
Two electronic databases and gray literature were searched. Eligible studies consisted of randomized/controlled clinical trials or cohort studies examining the effects of mental health services on ED use and costs for this care. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for relevance and study quality. Relative risks (RR), risk differences (RD), or mean differences (MD) were calculated for each study's primary outcome with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analysis was deferred due to substantial heterogeneity.
Six studies were included. Overall risk of bias in the studies ranged from low, unclear, to high. The majority of programs had no effect on ED visits for mental health care. A school-based program was found to reduce the risk of ED visits for any reason during use (RD, -8.0%; 95% CI: -15.2%, -0.9%); however, these visits were not specific to mental health. Three studies examined costs. A wrap-around clinical management program was associated with higher average ED costs per patient per month ($20.07 US dollars) compared to usual outpatient care; other studies reported no cost differences.
At this time, there is limited evidence to suggest outpatient, primary care, community and/or school-based mental health services impact ED use and costs for mental health care. Additional studies are needed.
儿科心理健康护理的急诊科就诊人数增加,这表明有必要了解心理健康服务对基于急诊的护理的影响。本系统评价考察了门诊、初级保健、社区和/或学校环境中提供的心理健康服务对急诊科使用情况及基于急诊科的心理健康护理费用的影响。
检索了两个电子数据库和灰色文献。符合条件的研究包括随机/对照临床试验或队列研究,这些研究考察了心理健康服务对急诊科使用情况及此类护理费用的影响。两名评审员独立筛选研究的相关性和研究质量。为每项研究的主要结局计算相对风险(RR)、风险差异(RD)或均值差异(MD),并给出95%置信区间(CI)。由于存在实质性异质性,故未进行荟萃分析。
纳入了六项研究。这些研究的总体偏倚风险范围从低、不明确到高。大多数项目对心理健康护理的急诊科就诊人数没有影响。一项基于学校的项目被发现可降低使用期间因任何原因前往急诊科就诊的风险(RD,-8.0%;95%CI:-15.2%,-0.9%);然而,这些就诊并非特定于心理健康方面。三项研究考察了费用。与常规门诊护理相比,一项综合性临床管理项目与每位患者每月更高的平均急诊科费用(20.07美元)相关;其他研究报告无费用差异。
目前,仅有有限的证据表明门诊、初级保健、社区和/或基于学校的心理健康服务会影响急诊科的使用情况及心理健康护理费用。还需要更多的研究。