Center for Hyperbaric Medicine and Tissue Repair, Marshfield Clinic, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.
Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Aug;100(4):757-776. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.05.007.
This review of the literature concerning bacteria, antibiotics and tissue repair shows there are extensive data supporting microbial interference with wound healing once bacterial burden exceeds 104 CFU per unit of measure, The mechanism of bacterial interference lies largely in prolonging the inflammatory phase of tissue repair. Reducing the microbial bioburden allows tissue repair to continue. Systemic and topical antimicrobials appear critical to reducing the bioburden and facilitating repair. The current controversy over the use of antimicrobials in patients with chronically infected wounds, in particular, revolves around the definition of infection. The reliance on classic clinical signs of inflammation to support antimicrobial use in these patients is tenuous due to the lack of correlation of these signs with the microbial burden known to impair tissue repair.
这篇文献综述探讨了细菌、抗生素与组织修复之间的关系,结果表明有大量数据支持细菌负荷超过每单位 104CFU 时会对伤口愈合产生干扰。细菌干扰的机制主要在于延长组织修复的炎症期。降低微生物生物负荷有助于组织修复的继续进行。全身和局部使用抗菌药物似乎对于降低生物负荷和促进修复至关重要。目前,关于慢性感染性伤口患者使用抗菌药物的争议主要集中在感染的定义上。由于经典炎症临床体征与已知会损害组织修复的微生物负荷缺乏相关性,因此依赖这些体征来支持此类患者使用抗菌药物的做法并不可靠。