: Bladder injuries are broadly classified based on anatomical location into two main categories: extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal. Traditionally, clinicians manage most extraperitoneal bladder ruptures conservatively with catheter drainage, while intraperitoneal ruptures are surgically repaired. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of conservative management of intraperitoneal bladder rupture in the largest series to date. A retrospective review was performed of patients treated for intraperitoneal bladder perforations at two large tertiary care centers from 2015 to 2023. The charts of 290 patients with intraperitoneal perforations were reviewed to compile a list of those who underwent initial conservative management of their rupture via Foley catheter, of which there were 16. Demographic data was collected as well as variables related to patient characteristics, computed tomography (CT) measured size of perforation, management, complications, and follow-up. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and comparative analyses (-test and Fisher's exact test) were performed. Our final analysis identified 16 patients with intraperitoneal bladder rupture treated with initial conservative management. Of these patients, 15 (94%) were successfully managed with Foley catheter placement. Four patients (25%) experienced complications after conservative management, which included long-term urinary incontinence/retention, urinary tract infection (UTI), and pelvic abscess. For patients successfully managed conservatively, the median duration of catheterization was 18 days (IQR 21.75). : For patients with small intraperitoneal bladder ruptures, conservative management with prolonged Foley catheterization is a suitable and successful strategy. Future studies evaluating outcomes in larger cohorts of patients will help determine whether this strategy should be considered more frequently in select patient populations.